From: Igor Plyatov <plyatov@gmail.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geomatsi@gmail.com,
nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux@maxim.org.za,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
christian.glindkamp@taskit.de, ryan@bluewatersys.com,
pgsellmann@portner-elektronik.at
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for high master clock
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:02:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292180579.8737.12.camel@homepc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D04D2E2.20100@ru.mvista.com>
Dear Sergei,
> Hello.
>
> On 11-12-2010 23:37, Igor Plyatov wrote:
>
> > The AT91SAM9 microcontrollers with master clock higher then 105 MHz
> > and PIO0, have overflow of the NCS_RD_PULSE value in the MSB. This
> > lead to "NCS_RD_PULSE" pulse longer then "NRD_CYCLE" pulse and driver
> > does not detect ATA device.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Plyatov<plyatov@gmail.com>
> [...]
Please use more descriptive comments, because it is not clear what you
mean here. Maybe here you just cut a text...
It is so strange to cut such small amount of text and I does not have
any idea why here is "[...]" exists.
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > index 0da0dcc..a462405 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> [...]
The same as above. Nobody are able to read you mind on the distance :-)
> > @@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ struct at91_ide_info {
> > };
> >
> > static const struct ata_timing initial_timing =
> > - {XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 600, 0};
> > + {XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 0, 600, 0};
>
> BTW, you haven't described this in the changelog...
Here is just a typo fixed for the ata_timing structure. This typo does
not have influence on the driver operation, but I do not like to leave
such a negligible problem as it is.
> WBR, Sergei
Best regards!
--
Igor Plyatov
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: plyatov@gmail.com (Igor Plyatov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for high master clock
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:02:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292180579.8737.12.camel@homepc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D04D2E2.20100@ru.mvista.com>
Dear Sergei,
> Hello.
>
> On 11-12-2010 23:37, Igor Plyatov wrote:
>
> > The AT91SAM9 microcontrollers with master clock higher then 105 MHz
> > and PIO0, have overflow of the NCS_RD_PULSE value in the MSB. This
> > lead to "NCS_RD_PULSE" pulse longer then "NRD_CYCLE" pulse and driver
> > does not detect ATA device.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Plyatov<plyatov@gmail.com>
> [...]
Please use more descriptive comments, because it is not clear what you
mean here. Maybe here you just cut a text...
It is so strange to cut such small amount of text and I does not have
any idea why here is "[...]" exists.
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > index 0da0dcc..a462405 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c
> [...]
The same as above. Nobody are able to read you mind on the distance :-)
> > @@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ struct at91_ide_info {
> > };
> >
> > static const struct ata_timing initial_timing =
> > - {XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 600, 0};
> > + {XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 0, 600, 0};
>
> BTW, you haven't described this in the changelog...
Here is just a typo fixed for the ata_timing structure. This typo does
not have influence on the driver operation, but I do not like to leave
such a negligible problem as it is.
> WBR, Sergei
Best regards!
--
Igor Plyatov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-12 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-11 20:37 [PATCH v2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for high master clock Igor Plyatov
2010-12-11 20:37 ` Igor Plyatov
2010-12-11 22:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-12-11 22:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-12-12 13:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-12 13:49 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-12 19:02 ` Igor Plyatov [this message]
2010-12-12 19:02 ` Igor Plyatov
2010-12-13 11:02 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-13 11:02 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2010-12-24 18:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-12-24 18:30 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292180579.8737.12.camel@homepc \
--to=plyatov@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.glindkamp@taskit.de \
--cc=geomatsi@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=pgsellmann@portner-elektronik.at \
--cc=ryan@bluewatersys.com \
--cc=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.