From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:36:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296225364.5511.6.camel@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296224232-8115-2-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk>
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression data;
> @@
>
> if (data = NULL) { ...
> * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> ...
> return ...;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
Nth call.
If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
> ---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto list_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
>
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 09:36:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296225364.5511.6.camel@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296224232-8115-2-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk>
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression data;
> @@
>
> if (data == NULL) { ...
> * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> ...
> return ...;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
Nth call.
If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
> ---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto list_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
>
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-28 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-28 13:58 [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 14:17 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 14:36 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2011-01-28 14:36 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 14:58 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 14:58 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 15:23 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 15:23 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 15:46 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 15:46 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296225364.5511.6.camel@sifl \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.