From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>,
Sheetal Sahasrabudhe <sheetals@codeaurora.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, jamie.iles@picochip.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: accessing vfpinstr macros from outside vfp directory
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 13:24:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301833480.5022.11.camel@jazzbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D96499B.5070402@codeaurora.org>
Hi Bryan,
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 22:54 +0100, Bryan Huntsman wrote:
> On 04/01/11 10:27, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Neil,
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:04 +0100, Neil Leeder wrote:
> >> Any opinions on what would be the best thing to do here? Choices
> appear to be:
> >>
> >> 1) allow the relative include path of ../vfp/vfpinstr.h
> >> 2) move the definitions of fmrx, fmxr from vfp/vfpinstr.h to
> include/asm/vfp.h
> >> 3) move vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm
> >> 4) other...?
> >>
> >> If it helps, I can create a patch for whichever is considered the
> preferred solution.
> >>
> >
> > I personally don't find option (1) that offensive - Bryan seemed to
> > differ though so perhaps option (2) would keep him happy?
> >
> > I don't think option (3) is sensible given that the majority of the
> > header file is private to /vfp.
> >
> > Will
>
> I raised it as a question. If that's the only sane thing to do here,
> then do it. Since no one else seems to have chimed in on (2) or (3),
> I'm fine with the patch as-is.
Ok, great. Let's leave it like it is for the time-being and if other
people start using things from the vfp headers then we should consider
refactoring some of that code (currently I think it's restricted to this
patch series and some files under vfp/).
Cheers,
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: accessing vfpinstr macros from outside vfp directory
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 13:24:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301833480.5022.11.camel@jazzbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D96499B.5070402@codeaurora.org>
Hi Bryan,
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 22:54 +0100, Bryan Huntsman wrote:
> On 04/01/11 10:27, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Neil,
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:04 +0100, Neil Leeder wrote:
> >> Any opinions on what would be the best thing to do here? Choices
> appear to be:
> >>
> >> 1) allow the relative include path of ../vfp/vfpinstr.h
> >> 2) move the definitions of fmrx, fmxr from vfp/vfpinstr.h to
> include/asm/vfp.h
> >> 3) move vfp/vfpinstr.h to include/asm
> >> 4) other...?
> >>
> >> If it helps, I can create a patch for whichever is considered the
> preferred solution.
> >>
> >
> > I personally don't find option (1) that offensive - Bryan seemed to
> > differ though so perhaps option (2) would keep him happy?
> >
> > I don't think option (3) is sensible given that the majority of the
> > header file is private to /vfp.
> >
> > Will
>
> I raised it as a question. If that's the only sane thing to do here,
> then do it. Since no one else seems to have chimed in on (2) or (3),
> I'm fine with the patch as-is.
Ok, great. Let's leave it like it is for the time-being and if other
people start using things from the vfp headers then we should consider
refactoring some of that code (currently I think it's restricted to this
patch series and some files under vfp/).
Cheers,
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-03 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-29 21:04 accessing vfpinstr macros from outside vfp directory Neil Leeder
2011-03-29 21:04 ` Neil Leeder
2011-04-01 17:27 ` Will Deacon
2011-04-01 17:27 ` Will Deacon
2011-04-01 21:54 ` Bryan Huntsman
2011-04-01 21:54 ` Bryan Huntsman
2011-04-03 12:24 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2011-04-03 12:24 ` Will Deacon
2011-04-04 14:16 ` Neil Leeder
2011-04-04 14:16 ` Neil Leeder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1301833480.5022.11.camel@jazzbox \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jamie.iles@picochip.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=nleeder@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sheetals@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.