All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] break out page allocation warning code
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:10:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303139455.9615.2533.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104161653220.14788@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 17:02 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > +void warn_alloc_failed(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order, const char *fmt, ...)
> > +{
> > +	va_list args;
> > +	unsigned int filter = SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
> > +	const gfp_t wait = gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT;
> > +
> 
> "wait" is unnecessary.  You didn't do "const gfp_t nowarn = gfp_mask & 
> __GFP_NOWARN;" for the same reason.

This line is just a copy from the __alloc_pages_slowpath() one.  I guess
we only use it once, so I've got no problem killing it.

> > +	if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) || !__ratelimit(&nopage_rs))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This documents exceptions given to allocations in certain
> > +	 * contexts that are allowed to allocate outside current's set
> > +	 * of allowed nodes.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
> > +		if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) ||
> > +		    (current->flags & (PF_MEMALLOC | PF_EXITING)))
> > +			filter &= ~SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
> > +	if (in_interrupt() || !wait)
> > +		filter &= ~SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
> > +
> > +	if (fmt) {
> > +		printk(KERN_WARNING);
> > +		va_start(args, fmt);
> > +		vprintk(fmt, args);
> > +		va_end(args);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: page allocation failure: order:%d, mode:0x%x\n",
> > +			current->comm, order, gfp_mask);
> 
> pr_warning()?

OK, I'll change it back.

> current->comm should always be printed with get_task_comm() to avoid 
> racing with /proc/pid/comm.  Since this function can be called potentially 
> deep in the stack, you may need to serialize this with a 
> statically-allocated buffer.

This code was already in page_alloc.c.  I'm simply breaking it out here
trying to keep the changes down to what is needed minimally to move the
code.  Correcting this preexisting problem sounds like a great follow-on
patch.

-- Dave


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] break out page allocation warning code
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:10:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303139455.9615.2533.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104161653220.14788@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 17:02 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > +void warn_alloc_failed(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order, const char *fmt, ...)
> > +{
> > +	va_list args;
> > +	unsigned int filter = SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
> > +	const gfp_t wait = gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT;
> > +
> 
> "wait" is unnecessary.  You didn't do "const gfp_t nowarn = gfp_mask & 
> __GFP_NOWARN;" for the same reason.

This line is just a copy from the __alloc_pages_slowpath() one.  I guess
we only use it once, so I've got no problem killing it.

> > +	if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_NOWARN) || !__ratelimit(&nopage_rs))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This documents exceptions given to allocations in certain
> > +	 * contexts that are allowed to allocate outside current's set
> > +	 * of allowed nodes.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
> > +		if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) ||
> > +		    (current->flags & (PF_MEMALLOC | PF_EXITING)))
> > +			filter &= ~SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
> > +	if (in_interrupt() || !wait)
> > +		filter &= ~SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES;
> > +
> > +	if (fmt) {
> > +		printk(KERN_WARNING);
> > +		va_start(args, fmt);
> > +		vprintk(fmt, args);
> > +		va_end(args);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: page allocation failure: order:%d, mode:0x%x\n",
> > +			current->comm, order, gfp_mask);
> 
> pr_warning()?

OK, I'll change it back.

> current->comm should always be printed with get_task_comm() to avoid 
> racing with /proc/pid/comm.  Since this function can be called potentially 
> deep in the stack, you may need to serialize this with a 
> statically-allocated buffer.

This code was already in page_alloc.c.  I'm simply breaking it out here
trying to keep the changes down to what is needed minimally to move the
code.  Correcting this preexisting problem sounds like a great follow-on
patch.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-18 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-15 17:04 [PATCH 1/2] break out page allocation warning code Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 17:04 ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 17:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] print vmalloc() state after allocation failures Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 17:04   ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 17:20   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-15 17:20     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-15 17:44     ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-15 17:44       ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-17  0:03       ` David Rientjes
2011-04-17  0:03         ` David Rientjes
2011-04-18 15:21         ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-18 15:21           ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-17  0:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] break out page allocation warning code David Rientjes
2011-04-17  0:02   ` David Rientjes
2011-04-18 15:10   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2011-04-18 15:10     ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-18 20:25     ` David Rientjes
2011-04-18 20:25       ` David Rientjes
2011-04-18 20:57       ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-18 20:57         ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-19 21:23         ` David Rientjes
2011-04-19 21:23           ` David Rientjes
2011-04-18 21:03       ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-18 21:03         ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-18 21:22       ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-18 21:22         ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-19  0:44         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-19  0:44           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-19 21:21           ` David Rientjes
2011-04-19 21:21             ` David Rientjes
2011-04-20  0:39             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-20  0:39               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-20 20:24               ` David Rientjes
2011-04-20 20:24                 ` David Rientjes
2011-04-20 20:34                 ` john stultz
2011-04-20 20:34                   ` john stultz
2011-04-21  1:29                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-21  1:29                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-25  4:21                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-25  4:21                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-26 19:27                     ` john stultz
2011-04-26 19:27                       ` john stultz
2011-04-27 23:51                       ` David Rientjes
2011-04-27 23:51                         ` David Rientjes
2011-04-28  0:32                         ` john stultz
2011-04-28  0:32                           ` john stultz
2011-04-28  1:29                           ` john stultz
2011-04-28  1:29                             ` john stultz
2011-04-28 22:48                             ` David Rientjes
2011-04-28 22:48                               ` David Rientjes
2011-04-28 23:48                               ` john stultz
2011-04-28 23:48                                 ` john stultz
2011-04-29  0:04                                 ` john stultz
2011-04-29  0:04                                   ` john stultz
2011-04-26 21:25                     ` john stultz
2011-04-26 21:25                       ` john stultz
2011-04-28  3:05                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-28  3:05                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-20  1:41             ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-20  1:41               ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-20  1:50               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-20  1:50                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-20  2:19                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-20  2:19                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-20  2:46                   ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-20  2:46                     ` Dave Hansen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-19 16:21 Dave Hansen
2011-04-19 16:21 ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-08 20:22 Dave Hansen
2011-04-08 20:22 ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-08 20:37 ` David Rientjes
2011-04-08 20:37   ` David Rientjes
2011-04-08 20:43   ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-08 20:43     ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-08 20:54 ` Michał Nazarewicz
2011-04-08 21:02   ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-08 21:02     ` Dave Hansen
2011-04-11 10:20     ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-11 10:20       ` Michal Nazarewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1303139455.9615.2533.camel@nimitz \
    --to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.