From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 17:04:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305237882.2575.100.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305230652.2575.72.camel@mulgrave.site>
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 15:04 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Confirmed, I'm afraid ... I can trigger the problem with all three
> patches under PREEMPT. It's not a hang this time, it's just kswapd
> taking 100% system time on 1 CPU and it won't calm down after I unload
> the system.
Just on a "if you don't know what's wrong poke about and see" basis, I
sliced out all the complex logic in sleeping_prematurely() and, as far
as I can tell, it cures the problem behaviour. I've loaded up the
system, and taken the tar load generator through three runs without
producing a spinning kswapd (this is PREEMPT). I'll try with a
non-PREEMPT kernel shortly.
What this seems to say is that there's a problem with the complex logic
in sleeping_prematurely(). I'm pretty sure hacking up
sleeping_prematurely() just to dump all the calculations is the wrong
thing to do, but perhaps someone can see what the right thing is ...
By the way, I stripped off all the patches, so this is a plain old
2.6.38.6 kernel with the default FC15 config.
James
---
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0665520..1bdea7d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2255,6 +2255,8 @@ static bool sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining,
if (remaining)
return true;
+ return false;
+
/* Check the watermark levels */
for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 17:04:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305237882.2575.100.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305230652.2575.72.camel@mulgrave.site>
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 15:04 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> Confirmed, I'm afraid ... I can trigger the problem with all three
> patches under PREEMPT. It's not a hang this time, it's just kswapd
> taking 100% system time on 1 CPU and it won't calm down after I unload
> the system.
Just on a "if you don't know what's wrong poke about and see" basis, I
sliced out all the complex logic in sleeping_prematurely() and, as far
as I can tell, it cures the problem behaviour. I've loaded up the
system, and taken the tar load generator through three runs without
producing a spinning kswapd (this is PREEMPT). I'll try with a
non-PREEMPT kernel shortly.
What this seems to say is that there's a problem with the complex logic
in sleeping_prematurely(). I'm pretty sure hacking up
sleeping_prematurely() just to dump all the calculations is the wrong
thing to do, but perhaps someone can see what the right thing is ...
By the way, I stripped off all the patches, so this is a plain old
2.6.38.6 kernel with the default FC15 config.
James
---
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 0665520..1bdea7d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2255,6 +2255,8 @@ static bool sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining,
if (remaining)
return true;
+ return false;
+
/* Check the watermark levels */
for (i = 0; i < pgdat->nr_zones; i++) {
struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + i;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 157+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-11 15:29 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 15:29 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: slub: Do not wake kswapd for SLUBs speculative " Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 15:29 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: slub: Do not take expensive steps " Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 15:29 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 21:10 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 21:10 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0 Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 15:29 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 20:38 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-11 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-11 21:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 21:09 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 22:27 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 10:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 10:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-16 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-16 21:03 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 9:48 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 19:25 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17 19:25 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-12 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 15:15 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:15 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 15:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 15:43 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:43 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:46 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 15:46 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 16:00 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:00 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:08 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 16:08 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:30 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:30 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-13 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-15 16:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-15 16:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-16 8:42 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-16 8:42 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:36 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 18:36 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 17:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 15:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 15:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 18:37 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 18:37 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 18:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 19:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 19:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 19:44 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 19:44 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:31 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:31 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 22:04 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-05-12 22:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 22:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 22:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 22:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 22:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-12 22:58 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-13 5:39 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-13 5:39 ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-13 0:47 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 0:47 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 4:12 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 4:12 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 10:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 10:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 10:30 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 6:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-13 6:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-13 6:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-13 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 10:05 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 16:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 17:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-12 17:37 ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-12 15:45 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 15:45 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-11 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations James Bottomley
2011-05-11 21:39 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-11 22:28 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 22:28 ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-11 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 11:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 11:13 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 13:19 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 13:19 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 14:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 14:04 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 11:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 18:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-13 11:24 ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 11:24 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1305237882.2575.100.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.