From: Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efifb: Fix call to wrong unregister function
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 23:36:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307921807.1934.0.camel@Tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimXALxHwNMSODXujT4pT-C+m3rcaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On æ—¥, 2011-06-12 at 19:48 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hey,
>
> 2011/6/12 wanlong.gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com>:
> > <snip>
> >
> > Hi Maarten:
> > It registered efifb_device but try to unregistered efifb_driver,
> > so I think you should fix it like this?
> Ah yes, that seems to be the correct one, platform_driver_register was
> removed. Not 100% sure if acked by or signed-off-by is appropriate
> here.
I think signed-off-by is OK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
>
> ~Maarten
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efifb: Fix call to wrong unregister function
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:36:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307921807.1934.0.camel@Tux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimXALxHwNMSODXujT4pT-C+m3rcaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 日, 2011-06-12 at 19:48 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Hey,
>
> 2011/6/12 wanlong.gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com>:
> > <snip>
> >
> > Hi Maarten:
> > It registered efifb_device but try to unregistered efifb_driver,
> > so I think you should fix it like this?
> Ah yes, that seems to be the correct one, platform_driver_register was
> removed. Not 100% sure if acked by or signed-off-by is appropriate
> here.
I think signed-off-by is OK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>
>
> ~Maarten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-12 23:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-12 8:45 [PATCH] efifb: Fix call to wrong unregister function Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-12 8:45 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-12 10:52 ` wanlong.gao
2011-06-12 10:52 ` wanlong.gao
2011-06-12 17:48 ` [PATCH] " Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-12 17:48 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-12 23:36 ` Wanlong Gao [this message]
2011-06-12 23:36 ` Wanlong Gao
2011-06-13 2:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-06-13 2:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-06-13 7:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-13 7:51 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2011-06-14 7:33 ` Paul Mundt
2011-06-14 7:33 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307921807.1934.0.camel@Tux \
--to=wanlong.gao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.