From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, scarybeasts@gmail.com, djm@mindrot.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jmorris@namei.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
kees.cook@canonical.com, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
segoon@openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:14:41 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322439281.23348.34.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314682083.2488.73.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
> > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility
> > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER.
> >
> > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
>
> Seen these around for a while ... :-)
>
> I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the
> actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc.
Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER
upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ?
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
scarybeasts@gmail.com, djm@mindrot.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
segoon@openwall.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
kees.cook@canonical.com, jmorris@namei.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:14:41 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322439281.23348.34.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314682083.2488.73.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote:
> > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility
> > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER.
> >
> > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
>
> Seen these around for a while ... :-)
>
> I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the
> actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc.
Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER
upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ?
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-28 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-24 0:36 [PATCH v9 01/13] tracing: split out filter initialization and clean up uses Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 02/13] tracing: split out syscall_trace_enter construction Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 03/13] seccomp_filter: new mode with configurable syscall filters Will Drewry
2011-06-24 7:30 ` Damien Miller
2011-06-24 20:20 ` Kees Cook
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 04/13] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works Will Drewry
2011-06-24 7:24 ` Chris Evans
[not found] ` <BANLkTimtYUyXbZjWhjK61B_1WBXE4MoAeA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-06-26 23:20 ` James Morris
2011-06-29 19:13 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-30 1:30 ` James Morris
2011-07-01 11:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 12:56 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 13:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 15:46 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 16:43 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 18:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-01 18:09 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-01 18:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-04 2:19 ` James Morris
2011-07-05 12:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-05 23:46 ` James Morris
2011-07-06 0:37 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Ted Ts'o
2011-07-05 23:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-05 2:54 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Eugene Teo
2011-07-01 20:25 ` Kees Cook
2011-07-04 16:09 ` [Ksummit-2011-discuss] " Greg KH
2011-07-01 21:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 21:34 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-05 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-06 18:24 ` Will Drewry
2011-07-05 15:26 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 06/13] x86: add HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 07/13] arm: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 08/13] microblaze: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 09/13] mips: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 10/13] s390: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 11/13] powerpc: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` Will Drewry
2011-08-30 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-08-30 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-11-28 0:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-11-28 0:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-11-28 1:45 ` Will Drewry
2011-11-28 1:45 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 12/13] sparc: " Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` [PATCH v9 13/13] sh: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
2011-06-24 0:36 ` Will Drewry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1322439281.23348.34.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=djm@mindrot.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scarybeasts@gmail.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.