All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: TFP410: use gpio_set_value_cansleep
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 06:53:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336632790.5182.8.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120509233745.GZ5088@atomide.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2013 bytes --]

On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:37 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com> [120509 15:53]:
> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > > * Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com> [120509 15:12]:
> > >> The Beagleboard xM gpio used for TFP410 powerdown is connected through
> > >> an I2C attached chip which means setting the GPIO can sleep. Code that
> > >> calls tfp410_power_on/off holds a mutex, so sleeping should be fine.
> > >
> > > What's the error without this patch? Or just no display?
> > >
> > > Just wondering if it's safe to merge Tomi's clean up series to
> > > arm-soc tree..
> > 
> > The only platform that has a problem is Beagleboard xM, and that is
> > only after 'ARM: OMAP: Cleanup Beagleboard DVI reset gpio' is applied.
> > Since the context actually can sleep, the only consequence is a
> > WARN_ON statement.
> > 
> > So yes, it should be safe.
> 
> Well since I have not actually merged it with other branches yet, I'll wait
> for Tomi to apply that and repull his for-l-o-3.5 branch.

You can pull for-l-o-3.5 as it is now, there's no need to change it.
This _cansleep change is a separate dss specific change.

So to summarize:

Currently the powerdown GPIO for tfp410 is handled in the board files
(and called reset gpio), with gpio_set_value(). My cleanup series moves
this to the tfp410 driver.

BB-xM needs to use gpio_set_value_cansleep() in tfp410 to function
properly, so the tfp410 driver needs to be changed, as this patch does.
I will take this patch to the dss tree.

So it's safe to pull my cleanup series, but if I understood correctly,
applying Russ's "[PATCH v4] ARM: OMAP: Cleanup Beagleboard DVI reset
gpio" will cause WARN_ONs on BB-xM until this patch to tfp410 is also
applied.

But it doesn't sound too serious, so I think it's safe to apply the
"cleanup beagleboard dvi" patch also. The warning will go away when both
l-o and dss trees are pulled in the merge window.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAPDSS: TFP410: use gpio_set_value_cansleep
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 09:53:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1336632790.5182.8.camel@deskari> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120509233745.GZ5088@atomide.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2013 bytes --]

On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 16:37 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com> [120509 15:53]:
> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > > * Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@ti.com> [120509 15:12]:
> > >> The Beagleboard xM gpio used for TFP410 powerdown is connected through
> > >> an I2C attached chip which means setting the GPIO can sleep. Code that
> > >> calls tfp410_power_on/off holds a mutex, so sleeping should be fine.
> > >
> > > What's the error without this patch? Or just no display?
> > >
> > > Just wondering if it's safe to merge Tomi's clean up series to
> > > arm-soc tree..
> > 
> > The only platform that has a problem is Beagleboard xM, and that is
> > only after 'ARM: OMAP: Cleanup Beagleboard DVI reset gpio' is applied.
> > Since the context actually can sleep, the only consequence is a
> > WARN_ON statement.
> > 
> > So yes, it should be safe.
> 
> Well since I have not actually merged it with other branches yet, I'll wait
> for Tomi to apply that and repull his for-l-o-3.5 branch.

You can pull for-l-o-3.5 as it is now, there's no need to change it.
This _cansleep change is a separate dss specific change.

So to summarize:

Currently the powerdown GPIO for tfp410 is handled in the board files
(and called reset gpio), with gpio_set_value(). My cleanup series moves
this to the tfp410 driver.

BB-xM needs to use gpio_set_value_cansleep() in tfp410 to function
properly, so the tfp410 driver needs to be changed, as this patch does.
I will take this patch to the dss tree.

So it's safe to pull my cleanup series, but if I understood correctly,
applying Russ's "[PATCH v4] ARM: OMAP: Cleanup Beagleboard DVI reset
gpio" will cause WARN_ONs on BB-xM until this patch to tfp410 is also
applied.

But it doesn't sound too serious, so I think it's safe to apply the
"cleanup beagleboard dvi" patch also. The warning will go away when both
l-o and dss trees are pulled in the merge window.

 Tomi


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-10  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-09 22:08 [PATCH] OMAPDSS: TFP410: use gpio_set_value_cansleep Russ Dill
2012-05-09 22:08 ` Russ Dill
2012-05-09 22:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-09 22:14   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-09 22:50   ` Russ Dill
2012-05-09 22:50     ` Russ Dill
2012-05-09 23:37     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-09 23:37       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-10  6:53       ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
2012-05-10  6:53         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-05-10 16:16         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-10 16:16           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-10  6:54 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-05-10  6:54   ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1336632790.5182.8.camel@deskari \
    --to=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    --cc=Russ.Dill@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.