From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 17:15:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338041744.2525.46.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC0E257.1030403@nod.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 16:01 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > We can start with the UBI tests from the mtd-utils plust the integck
> > test. And whatever goes to my branch should never break them. Do these
> > tests pass now? If not, let's make them pass.
> >
>
> What is "integck" test?
It is a quite extensive FS check which we use for UBIFS. As UBIFS is the
main UBI client - it makes sense to run it. It lives in the
mtd-utils.git/tests/fs/integck
./integck -n8 /mnt/ubifs
would run in. /mnt/ubifs is the ubifs mount-point. -n8 means repeat 8
times.
> UBI tests from mtd-utils pass now.
> The io_paral triggered a race condition on my very fast qemu-kvm test system.
> On my test board with real NAND flash this race never happened.
> Anyway, it's fixed now.
Cool!
> I'm mostly testing with custom scripts, shall I send a patch against UBI tests?
Yes, it would be great to integrate this, of course. I might also want
to send you a patch, then I'd run it.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de,
tim.bird@am.sony.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 17:15:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338041744.2525.46.camel@koala> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC0E257.1030403@nod.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1040 bytes --]
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 16:01 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > We can start with the UBI tests from the mtd-utils plust the integck
> > test. And whatever goes to my branch should never break them. Do these
> > tests pass now? If not, let's make them pass.
> >
>
> What is "integck" test?
It is a quite extensive FS check which we use for UBIFS. As UBIFS is the
main UBI client - it makes sense to run it. It lives in the
mtd-utils.git/tests/fs/integck
./integck -n8 /mnt/ubifs
would run in. /mnt/ubifs is the ubifs mount-point. -n8 means repeat 8
times.
> UBI tests from mtd-utils pass now.
> The io_paral triggered a race condition on my very fast qemu-kvm test system.
> On my test board with real NAND flash this race never happened.
> Anyway, it's fixed now.
Cool!
> I'm mostly testing with custom scripts, shall I send a patch against UBI tests?
Yes, it would be great to integrate this, of course. I might also want
to send you a patch, then I'd run it.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-23 11:06 [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing) Richard Weinberger
2012-05-23 11:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-23 11:06 ` [PATCH] [RFC] UBI: Implement Fastmap support Richard Weinberger
2012-05-23 11:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-26 13:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-26 13:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-31 10:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-05-31 10:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-05-31 13:31 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-31 13:31 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 5:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 5:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 8:00 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:00 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 8:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-05-26 12:41 ` [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing) Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-26 12:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-26 14:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-26 14:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-26 14:15 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-05-26 14:15 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-28 6:36 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-05-28 6:36 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-05-28 6:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-28 6:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-28 9:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-28 9:49 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338041744.2525.46.camel@koala \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.