From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 09:46:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338187619.2480.9.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120528093625.050badc6@pixies.home.jungo.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 822 bytes --]
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 09:36 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> Fine with me, I'm flexible ;)
>
> What's your plan for merging to the master branch?
Once it the review is finished, and we test it, verify power-cut
robusteness and resilience (we can discuss how separately), we merge it
to the master branch (by squeezing the history I guess).
> BTW, I know you formerly disliked the idea, but I'm in favor of having a
> CONFIG for the fastmap feature; with the config disabled, UBI must
> behave exactly as it was. The config can be later removed.
This makes maintaining difficult - I'll need to have another
compile-test.
We should have an ubiattach option instead (and add this feature to the
attach ioctl - thankfully we have unused bytes there).
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de,
tim.bird@am.sony.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 09:46:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338187619.2480.9.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120528093625.050badc6@pixies.home.jungo.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 822 bytes --]
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 09:36 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> Fine with me, I'm flexible ;)
>
> What's your plan for merging to the master branch?
Once it the review is finished, and we test it, verify power-cut
robusteness and resilience (we can discuss how separately), we merge it
to the master branch (by squeezing the history I guess).
> BTW, I know you formerly disliked the idea, but I'm in favor of having a
> CONFIG for the fastmap feature; with the config disabled, UBI must
> behave exactly as it was. The config can be later removed.
This makes maintaining difficult - I'll need to have another
compile-test.
We should have an ubiattach option instead (and add this feature to the
attach ioctl - thankfully we have unused bytes there).
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-28 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-23 11:06 [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing) Richard Weinberger
2012-05-23 11:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-23 11:06 ` [PATCH] [RFC] UBI: Implement Fastmap support Richard Weinberger
2012-05-23 11:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-26 13:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-26 13:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-31 10:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-05-31 10:37 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-05-31 13:31 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-31 13:31 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 5:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 5:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 8:00 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:00 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-01 8:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-06-01 8:47 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-05-26 12:41 ` [RFC v7] UBI: Fastmap support (aka checkpointing) Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-26 12:41 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-26 14:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-26 14:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-26 14:15 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-26 14:15 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-28 6:36 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-05-28 6:36 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-05-28 6:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2012-05-28 6:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-28 9:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-05-28 9:49 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1338187619.2480.9.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=Heinz.Egger@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.