All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: anton@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
	dhowells@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	mattst88@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@twiddle.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, sivanich@sgi.com,
	greg.pearson@hp.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	bob.picco@oracle.com, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338973295.2749.81.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 14:52 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> -       if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > REMOTE_DISTANCE)
> +       if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > RECLAIM_DISTANCE) 

I actually considered this.. I just felt a little uneasy re-purposing
the RECLAIM_DISTANCE for this, but I guess its all the same anyway. Both
mean expensive-away-distance.

So I've taken this.

thanks!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: anton@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
	dhowells@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	mattst88@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@twiddle.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, sivanich@sgi.com,
	greg.pearson@hp.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	bob.picco@oracle.com, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:01:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338973295.2749.81.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 14:52 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> -       if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > REMOTE_DISTANCE)
> +       if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > RECLAIM_DISTANCE) 

I actually considered this.. I just felt a little uneasy re-purposing
the RECLAIM_DISTANCE for this, but I guess its all the same anyway. Both
mean expensive-away-distance.

So I've taken this.

thanks!

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	sivanich@sgi.com, x86@kernel.org, greg.pearson@hp.com,
	chris.mason@oracle.com, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com,
	mattst88@gmail.com, pjt@google.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
	seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, anton@samba.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	rth@twiddle.net, tony.luck@intel.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, bob.picco@oracle.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1338973295.2749.81.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>

On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 14:52 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> -       if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > REMOTE_DISTANCE)
> +       if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > RECLAIM_DISTANCE)=20

I actually considered this.. I just felt a little uneasy re-purposing
the RECLAIM_DISTANCE for this, but I guess its all the same anyway. Both
mean expensive-away-distance.

So I've taken this.

thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-06  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-06  6:52 [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes Alex Shi
2012-06-06  6:52 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-06  6:52 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-06  9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2012-06-06  9:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  9:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07  0:33   ` Alex Shi
2012-06-07  0:33     ` Alex Shi
2012-06-07  0:33     ` Alex Shi
2012-06-06 10:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-06-06 10:53   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-06-06 10:53   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-06-06 15:53 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/numa: Load " tip-bot for Alex Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1338973295.2749.81.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bob.picco@oracle.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=greg.pearson@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.