From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, anton@samba.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
mattst88@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@twiddle.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, sivanich@sgi.com,
greg.pearson@hp.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
bob.picco@oracle.com, chris.mason@oracle.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:53:08 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCF3694.206@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
Hello.
On 06-06-2012 10:52, Alex Shi wrote:
> commit cb83b629b
Please also specify that commit's summary in parens.
> remove the NODE sched domain and check if the node
> distance in SLIT table is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE, if so, it will
> lose the load balance chance at exec/fork/wake_affine points.
> But actually, even the node distance is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE,
> Modern CPUs also has QPI like connections, that make memory access is
"Is" not needed here.
> not too slow between nodes. So above losing on NUMA machine make a
> huge performance regression on benchmark: hackbench, tbench, netperf
> and oltp etc.
> This patch will recover the scheduler behavior to old mode on all my
> Intel platforms: NHM EP/EX, WSM EP, SNB EP/EP4S, and so remove the
> perfromance regressions. (all of them just has 2 kinds distance, 10 21)
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi<alex.shi@intel.com>
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, anton@samba.org,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
mattst88@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@twiddle.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, sivanich@sgi.com,
greg.pearson@hp.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
bob.picco@oracle.com, chris.mason@oracle.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:53:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCF3694.206@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
Hello.
On 06-06-2012 10:52, Alex Shi wrote:
> commit cb83b629b
Please also specify that commit's summary in parens.
> remove the NODE sched domain and check if the node
> distance in SLIT table is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE, if so, it will
> lose the load balance chance at exec/fork/wake_affine points.
> But actually, even the node distance is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE,
> Modern CPUs also has QPI like connections, that make memory access is
"Is" not needed here.
> not too slow between nodes. So above losing on NUMA machine make a
> huge performance regression on benchmark: hackbench, tbench, netperf
> and oltp etc.
> This patch will recover the scheduler behavior to old mode on all my
> Intel platforms: NHM EP/EX, WSM EP, SNB EP/EP4S, and so remove the
> perfromance regressions. (all of them just has 2 kinds distance, 10 21)
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi<alex.shi@intel.com>
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
sivanich@sgi.com, x86@kernel.org, greg.pearson@hp.com,
chris.mason@oracle.com, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com,
mattst88@gmail.com, pjt@google.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
cmetcalf@tilera.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, anton@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, rth@twiddle.net,
tony.luck@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
lethal@linux-sh.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
bob.picco@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:53:08 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCF3694.206@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338965571-9812-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
Hello.
On 06-06-2012 10:52, Alex Shi wrote:
> commit cb83b629b
Please also specify that commit's summary in parens.
> remove the NODE sched domain and check if the node
> distance in SLIT table is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE, if so, it will
> lose the load balance chance at exec/fork/wake_affine points.
> But actually, even the node distance is farther than REMOTE_DISTANCE,
> Modern CPUs also has QPI like connections, that make memory access is
"Is" not needed here.
> not too slow between nodes. So above losing on NUMA machine make a
> huge performance regression on benchmark: hackbench, tbench, netperf
> and oltp etc.
> This patch will recover the scheduler behavior to old mode on all my
> Intel platforms: NHM EP/EX, WSM EP, SNB EP/EP4S, and so remove the
> perfromance regressions. (all of them just has 2 kinds distance, 10 21)
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi<alex.shi@intel.com>
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-06 6:52 [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: do load balance between remote nodes Alex Shi
2012-06-06 6:52 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-06 6:52 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-06 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07 0:33 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-07 0:33 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-07 0:33 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-06 10:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2012-06-06 10:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-06-06 10:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-06-06 15:53 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/numa: Load " tip-bot for Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FCF3694.206@mvista.com \
--to=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bob.picco@oracle.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=greg.pearson@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.