* [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix @ 2012-06-20 8:25 Bogdan Marinescu 2012-06-21 12:29 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bogdan Marinescu @ 2012-06-20 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> --- meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022" PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}" -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix 2012-06-20 8:25 [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix Bogdan Marinescu @ 2012-06-21 12:29 ` Richard Purdie 2012-06-21 12:32 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-06-21 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: > This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations > (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling > lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. > > Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> > --- > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022" > > PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" > PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" > -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" > +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" > PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" > > do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}" Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new recipe still suffers from this issue please? Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix 2012-06-21 12:29 ` Richard Purdie @ 2012-06-21 12:32 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-06-21 12:33 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-06-21 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: >> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations >> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling >> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022" >> >> PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" >> PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" >> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" >> PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >> >> do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}" > > Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new > recipe still suffers from this issue please? Sure, I'm on it. Thanks, Bogdan > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix 2012-06-21 12:32 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-06-21 12:33 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-06-21 12:39 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-06-21 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: >>> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations >>> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling >>> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >>> --- >>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >>> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022" >>> >>> PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" >>> PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >>> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" >>> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" >>> PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >>> >>> do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}" >> >> Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new >> recipe still suffers from this issue please? > > Sure, I'm on it. Yep. We still need this addition to the recipe .. luckily, easy to do :) Cheers, Bruce > > Thanks, > Bogdan > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix 2012-06-21 12:33 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-06-21 12:39 ` Richard Purdie 2012-06-21 12:42 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-06-21 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:33 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A > <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie > > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: > >>> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations > >>> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling > >>> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> > >>> --- > >>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > >>> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 > >>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > >>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022" > >>> > >>> PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" > >>> PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" > >>> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" > >>> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" > >>> PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" > >>> > >>> do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}" > >> > >> Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new > >> recipe still suffers from this issue please? > > > > Sure, I'm on it. > > Yep. We still need this addition to the recipe .. luckily, easy to do :) I'm not sure, the autorenaming magic should take care of a simple RDEPENDS... Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix 2012-06-21 12:39 ` Richard Purdie @ 2012-06-21 12:42 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-06-21 14:59 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-06-21 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:33 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie >> > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: >> >>> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations >> >>> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling >> >>> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >> >>> --- >> >>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- >> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >>> >> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> >>> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 >> >>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> >>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022" >> >>> >> >>> PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" >> >>> PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >> >>> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" >> >>> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" >> >>> PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >> >>> >> >>> do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}" >> >> >> >> Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new >> >> recipe still suffers from this issue please? >> > >> > Sure, I'm on it. >> >> Yep. We still need this addition to the recipe .. luckily, easy to do :) > > I'm not sure, the autorenaming magic should take care of a simple > RDEPENDS... Ah yes, I wasn't sure about that myself. I'll just watch and wait in that case :) Bruce > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix 2012-06-21 12:42 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-06-21 14:59 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Marinescu, Bogdan A @ 2012-06-21 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:33 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marinescu, Bogdan A >>> <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Richard Purdie >>> > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> >> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:25 +0300, Bogdan Marinescu wrote: >>> >>> This patch makes linux-tools compile properly on multilib configurations >>> >>> (which failed because of some invalid dependencies). Tested by compiling >>> >>> lib32-core-image-sato-sdk. >>> >>> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bogdan Marinescu <bogdan.a.marinescu@intel.com> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- >>> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >>> >>> index 3b03c05..048608c 100644 >>> >>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >>> >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >>> >>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ do_install_perf[umask] = "022" >>> >>> >>> >>> PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" >>> >>> PERFDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >>> >>> -PERFRDEPENDS = "python perl elfutils" >>> >>> +PERFRDEPENDS = "${MLPREFIX}python ${MLPREFIX}perl ${MLPREFIX}elfutils" >>> >>> PERFRDEPENDS_libc-uclibc = "" >>> >>> >>> >>> do_compile_perf[depends] = "${PERFDEPENDS}" >>> >> >>> >> Bruce has just totally rearranged this code. Could you check if the new >>> >> recipe still suffers from this issue please? >>> > >>> > Sure, I'm on it. >>> >>> Yep. We still need this addition to the recipe .. luckily, easy to do :) >> >> I'm not sure, the autorenaming magic should take care of a simple >> RDEPENDS... > > Ah yes, I wasn't sure about that myself. I'll just watch and wait in > that case :) I'm not sure what to think. I don't get the error that I got yesterday when I compile lib32-core-image-sato-sdk, but I also can't find any linux-tools package anywhere. Is this normal? Thanks, Bogdan > > Bruce > >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > -- > "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await > thee at its end" > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-21 15:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-06-20 8:25 [PATCH] linux-tools: multilib compilation fix Bogdan Marinescu 2012-06-21 12:29 ` Richard Purdie 2012-06-21 12:32 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A 2012-06-21 12:33 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-06-21 12:39 ` Richard Purdie 2012-06-21 12:42 ` Bruce Ashfield 2012-06-21 14:59 ` Marinescu, Bogdan A
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.