From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:21:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343100106.3715.2.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6udruWL7oo6Qp6jkwQYceduTO1h1gKFz9TFX1TPZoNFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:32 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > As-is I'm backing off from the linear/legacy/tree merge patch as just
> > too risky. I've already pulled that stuff out of linux-next.
>
> Can I pull you pseries fix into my tree (my preference), or do I need
> to rebase on top of yours?
The mpic fix for the g5 is in Linus tree already, I added it on top of
powerpc -next before I asked Linus to pull.
For pseries (ie the fix for irq_find_mapping vs. radix), I don't have a
formal patch, just the one I hand typed in my previous email, so do
whatever you want with it.
Cheers,
Ben.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:21:46 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343100106.3715.2.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6udruWL7oo6Qp6jkwQYceduTO1h1gKFz9TFX1TPZoNFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:32 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > As-is I'm backing off from the linear/legacy/tree merge patch as just
> > too risky. I've already pulled that stuff out of linux-next.
>
> Can I pull you pseries fix into my tree (my preference), or do I need
> to rebase on top of yours?
The mpic fix for the g5 is in Linus tree already, I added it on top of
powerpc -next before I asked Linus to pull.
For pseries (ie the fix for irq_find_mapping vs. radix), I don't have a
formal patch, just the one I hand typed in my previous email, so do
whatever you want with it.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-24 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-22 2:47 next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain Hugh Dickins
2012-07-22 2:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-22 13:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-22 13:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-22 14:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-22 14:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-23 2:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-23 2:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-23 6:32 ` More irqdomain problems (Was: next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-23 6:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-25 5:09 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-25 5:09 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-23 7:24 ` next/mmotm unbootable on G5: irqdomain Hugh Dickins
2012-07-23 7:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-07-23 7:59 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-23 7:59 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-23 22:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-23 22:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-23 22:31 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-23 22:31 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-23 22:32 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-23 22:32 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-24 3:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2012-07-24 3:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-07-24 4:37 ` Grant Likely
2012-07-24 4:37 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343100106.3715.2.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.