All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation.
@ 2012-10-13  0:41 Igor Murzov
  2012-10-23 10:40   ` Zhang Rui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Igor Murzov @ 2012-10-13  0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-acpi
  Cc: Zhang Rui, Len Brown, Stefan Wilkens, Sergey V, linux-kernel,
	Igor Murzov

There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
any issues later. This should fix brightness controls on some laptops.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47861

Signed-off-by: Igor Murzov <e-mail@date.by>
Reviewed-by: Sergey V <sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
---
Previous discussion of the issue:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/56345

 drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index f94d4c8..0230cb6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -1345,12 +1345,15 @@ static int
 acpi_video_bus_get_devices(struct acpi_video_bus *video,
 			   struct acpi_device *device)
 {
-	int status;
+	int status = 0;
 	struct acpi_device *dev;
 
-	status = acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
-	if (status)
-		return status;
+	/*
+	 * There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
+	 * of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
+	 * any issues later.
+	 */
+	acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(dev, &device->children, node) {
 
-- 
1.7.12.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation.
  2012-10-13  0:41 [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation Igor Murzov
@ 2012-10-23 10:40   ` Zhang Rui
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2012-10-23 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Igor Murzov; +Cc: linux-acpi, Len Brown, Stefan Wilkens, Sergey V, linux-kernel

On 六, 2012-10-13 at 04:41 +0400, Igor Murzov wrote:
> There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> any issues later. This should fix brightness controls on some laptops.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Murzov <e-mail@date.by>
> Reviewed-by: Sergey V <sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>

applied to my next branch.

thanks,
rui
> ---
> Previous discussion of the issue:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/56345
> 
>  drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> index f94d4c8..0230cb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -1345,12 +1345,15 @@ static int
>  acpi_video_bus_get_devices(struct acpi_video_bus *video,
>  			   struct acpi_device *device)
>  {
> -	int status;
> +	int status = 0;
>  	struct acpi_device *dev;
>  
> -	status = acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
> -	if (status)
> -		return status;
> +	/*
> +	 * There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> +	 * of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> +	 * any issues later.
> +	 */
> +	acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(dev, &device->children, node) {
>  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation.
@ 2012-10-23 10:40   ` Zhang Rui
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2012-10-23 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Igor Murzov; +Cc: linux-acpi, Len Brown, Stefan Wilkens, Sergey V, linux-kernel

On 六, 2012-10-13 at 04:41 +0400, Igor Murzov wrote:
> There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> any issues later. This should fix brightness controls on some laptops.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Murzov <e-mail@date.by>
> Reviewed-by: Sergey V <sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>

applied to my next branch.

thanks,
rui
> ---
> Previous discussion of the issue:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/56345
> 
>  drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> index f94d4c8..0230cb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -1345,12 +1345,15 @@ static int
>  acpi_video_bus_get_devices(struct acpi_video_bus *video,
>  			   struct acpi_device *device)
>  {
> -	int status;
> +	int status = 0;
>  	struct acpi_device *dev;
>  
> -	status = acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
> -	if (status)
> -		return status;
> +	/*
> +	 * There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> +	 * of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> +	 * any issues later.
> +	 */
> +	acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(dev, &device->children, node) {
>  



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-23 10:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-13  0:41 [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation Igor Murzov
2012-10-23 10:40 ` Zhang Rui
2012-10-23 10:40   ` Zhang Rui

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.