* [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation.
@ 2012-10-13 0:41 Igor Murzov
2012-10-23 10:40 ` Zhang Rui
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Igor Murzov @ 2012-10-13 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-acpi
Cc: Zhang Rui, Len Brown, Stefan Wilkens, Sergey V, linux-kernel,
Igor Murzov
There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
any issues later. This should fix brightness controls on some laptops.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
Signed-off-by: Igor Murzov <e-mail@date.by>
Reviewed-by: Sergey V <sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
---
Previous discussion of the issue:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/56345
drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
index f94d4c8..0230cb6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
@@ -1345,12 +1345,15 @@ static int
acpi_video_bus_get_devices(struct acpi_video_bus *video,
struct acpi_device *device)
{
- int status;
+ int status = 0;
struct acpi_device *dev;
- status = acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
- if (status)
- return status;
+ /*
+ * There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
+ * of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
+ * any issues later.
+ */
+ acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
list_for_each_entry(dev, &device->children, node) {
--
1.7.12.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation.
2012-10-13 0:41 [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation Igor Murzov
@ 2012-10-23 10:40 ` Zhang Rui
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2012-10-23 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Igor Murzov; +Cc: linux-acpi, Len Brown, Stefan Wilkens, Sergey V, linux-kernel
On 六, 2012-10-13 at 04:41 +0400, Igor Murzov wrote:
> There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> any issues later. This should fix brightness controls on some laptops.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Murzov <e-mail@date.by>
> Reviewed-by: Sergey V <sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
applied to my next branch.
thanks,
rui
> ---
> Previous discussion of the issue:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/56345
>
> drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> index f94d4c8..0230cb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -1345,12 +1345,15 @@ static int
> acpi_video_bus_get_devices(struct acpi_video_bus *video,
> struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> - int status;
> + int status = 0;
> struct acpi_device *dev;
>
> - status = acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
> - if (status)
> - return status;
> + /*
> + * There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> + * of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> + * any issues later.
> + */
> + acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
>
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &device->children, node) {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation.
@ 2012-10-23 10:40 ` Zhang Rui
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhang Rui @ 2012-10-23 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Igor Murzov; +Cc: linux-acpi, Len Brown, Stefan Wilkens, Sergey V, linux-kernel
On 六, 2012-10-13 at 04:41 +0400, Igor Murzov wrote:
> There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> any issues later. This should fix brightness controls on some laptops.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47861
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Murzov <e-mail@date.by>
> Reviewed-by: Sergey V <sftp.mtuci@gmail.com>
applied to my next branch.
thanks,
rui
> ---
> Previous discussion of the issue:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/56345
>
> drivers/acpi/video.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> index f94d4c8..0230cb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -1345,12 +1345,15 @@ static int
> acpi_video_bus_get_devices(struct acpi_video_bus *video,
> struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> - int status;
> + int status = 0;
> struct acpi_device *dev;
>
> - status = acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
> - if (status)
> - return status;
> + /*
> + * There are systems where video module known to work fine regardless
> + * of broken _DOD and ignoring returned value here doesn't cause
> + * any issues later.
> + */
> + acpi_video_device_enumerate(video);
>
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &device->children, node) {
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-23 10:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-13 0:41 [PATCH] ACPI video: Ignore errors after _DOD evaluation Igor Murzov
2012-10-23 10:40 ` Zhang Rui
2012-10-23 10:40 ` Zhang Rui
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.