* Latest head causes challanges @ 2012-10-24 14:19 Andreas Müller 2012-10-24 14:21 ` [OE-core] " Phil Blundell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core Hi I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea what might caused this? Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 14:19 Latest head causes challanges Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 14:21 ` Phil Blundell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Phil Blundell @ 2012-10-24 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: > Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea > what might caused this? 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? p. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] Latest head causes challanges @ 2012-10-24 14:21 ` Phil Blundell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Phil Blundell @ 2012-10-24 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: > Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea > what might caused this? 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? p. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 14:21 ` [OE-core] " Phil Blundell @ 2012-10-24 14:24 ` Andreas Müller -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Blundell; +Cc: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea >> what might caused this? > > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? > > p. > Wow - I thought we are close to release... Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] Latest head causes challanges @ 2012-10-24 14:24 ` Andreas Müller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Phil Blundell; +Cc: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea >> what might caused this? > > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? > > p. > Wow - I thought we are close to release... Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 14:24 ` [OE-core] " Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 14:28 ` Phil Blundell -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Phil Blundell @ 2012-10-24 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:24 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: > >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea > >> what might caused this? > > > > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? > > > > p. > > > Wow - I thought we are close to release... Not that I'm any expert, but I think the release is coming from its own branch (which doesn't happen to contain that commit) and not from master. p. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] Latest head causes challanges @ 2012-10-24 14:28 ` Phil Blundell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Phil Blundell @ 2012-10-24 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:24 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: > >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea > >> what might caused this? > > > > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? > > > > p. > > > Wow - I thought we are close to release... Not that I'm any expert, but I think the release is coming from its own branch (which doesn't happen to contain that commit) and not from master. p. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [oe] Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 14:24 ` [OE-core] " Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 14:30 ` Paul Eggleton -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-10-24 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: Phil Blundell, openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wednesday 24 October 2012 16:24:08 Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: > >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea > >> what might caused this? > > > > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? > > > > p. > > Wow - I thought we are close to release... The master branch has already moved past release - danny is the release branch and does not have this patch. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [OE-core] Latest head causes challanges @ 2012-10-24 14:30 ` Paul Eggleton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-10-24 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: openembedded-devel, openembedded-core On Wednesday 24 October 2012 16:24:08 Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: > >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea > >> what might caused this? > > > > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? > > > > p. > > Wow - I thought we are close to release... The master branch has already moved past release - danny is the release branch and does not have this patch. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [oe] Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 14:30 ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton (?) @ 2012-10-24 14:49 ` Andreas Müller 2012-10-24 15:59 ` Richard Purdie 2012-10-24 17:01 ` Burton, Ross -1 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: openembedded-core On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 24 October 2012 16:24:08 Andreas Müller wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: >> >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: >> >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea >> >> what might caused this? >> > >> > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? >> > >> > p. >> >> Wow - I thought we are close to release... > > The master branch has already moved past release - danny is the release branch > and does not have this patch. > > Cheers, > Paul > To me this is a log off and go home. Since when do we care for FHS? I thought everything is on it's way to /lib... And I thought on master branch I am safe from strange changes these days... Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [oe] Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 14:49 ` [oe] " Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 15:59 ` Richard Purdie 2012-10-24 17:01 ` Burton, Ross 1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2012-10-24 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: Paul Eggleton, openembedded-core On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:49 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Paul Eggleton > <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 October 2012 16:24:08 Andreas Müller wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 16:19 +0200, Andreas Müller wrote: > >> >> I updated my layers this morning. Since that I have huge fallout: > >> >> Poking around I found /usr/libexec is missing on my machine. Any idea > >> >> what might caused this? > >> > > >> > 406bd38b4232f9f399ef5ffe0b4fac72ed605a23? > >> > > >> > p. > >> > >> Wow - I thought we are close to release... > > > > The master branch has already moved past release - danny is the release branch > > and does not have this patch. > > > > Cheers, > > Paul > > > To me this is a log off and go home. Since when do we care for FHS? I > thought everything is on it's way to /lib... And I thought on master > branch I am safe from strange changes these days... Set: libexecdir = "${exec_prefix}/libexec" and you will get the old behaviour. This change did not go into the release branch. If you want to track a stable release, please use the release branch. The master branch has opened up for further development now. With things like filesystem layout, we've always aimed to allow it to be configured as the end user requires and nothing has changed. We don't have to follow FSH although in some cases its probably useful to, or at least ensure you can follow it (which you couldn't previously). You can pick whichever layout you want and we've taken steps to ensure both layouts work. Part of the reason for doing this is specifically due to the fact that everything is on its way to /lib/. If you follow that through, it makes sense to split from /libexec/ to /lib/${PN} and separate the packages. If we need to do this, its better to test our code can support that kind of layout now, avoiding pain in the future. So I'm sorry this change is disruptive for you, I think there are ways you can avoid the problem, not least by setting the variable as above and avoiding the change. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [oe] Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 14:49 ` [oe] " Andreas Müller 2012-10-24 15:59 ` Richard Purdie @ 2012-10-24 17:01 ` Burton, Ross 2012-10-24 18:38 ` Andreas Müller 1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Burton, Ross @ 2012-10-24 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andreas Müller; +Cc: Paul Eggleton, openembedded-core On 24 October 2012 15:49, Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote: > To me this is a log off and go home. Since when do we care for FHS? I > thought everything is on it's way to /lib... And I thought on master > branch I am safe from strange changes these days... I'm curious as to why it's such a drastic change for you. Packages that Do The Right Thing will just work when libexecdir is changed, and by definition they are binaries that you won't be running yourself. So what's the problem? Ross ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [oe] Latest head causes challanges 2012-10-24 17:01 ` Burton, Ross @ 2012-10-24 18:38 ` Andreas Müller 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Andreas Müller @ 2012-10-24 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Burton, Ross; +Cc: Paul Eggleton, openembedded-core On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton@intel.com> wrote: > On 24 October 2012 15:49, Andreas Müller <schnitzeltony@googlemail.com> wrote: >> To me this is a log off and go home. Since when do we care for FHS? I >> thought everything is on it's way to /lib... And I thought on master >> branch I am safe from strange changes these days... > > I'm curious as to why it's such a drastic change for you. Packages > that Do The Right Thing will just work when libexecdir is changed, and > by definition they are binaries that you won't be running yourself. > So what's the problem? > > Ross My problems were: * I thought master branch was the one to go into stable release and did not expect changes like this when I updated. Maybe I missed some announcement for danny. * had to stop working because build from scratch was required - hope tomorrow everything is fine again. Andreas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-24 18:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-10-24 14:19 Latest head causes challanges Andreas Müller 2012-10-24 14:21 ` Phil Blundell 2012-10-24 14:21 ` [OE-core] " Phil Blundell 2012-10-24 14:24 ` Andreas Müller 2012-10-24 14:24 ` [OE-core] " Andreas Müller 2012-10-24 14:28 ` Phil Blundell 2012-10-24 14:28 ` [OE-core] " Phil Blundell 2012-10-24 14:30 ` [oe] " Paul Eggleton 2012-10-24 14:30 ` [OE-core] " Paul Eggleton 2012-10-24 14:49 ` [oe] " Andreas Müller 2012-10-24 15:59 ` Richard Purdie 2012-10-24 17:01 ` Burton, Ross 2012-10-24 18:38 ` Andreas Müller
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.