* [PATCH 0/2] numa/core updates @ 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins I've been testing wider workloads and here's two more small and obvious patches rounding up numa/core behavior around the edges. The NUMA code should now be pretty unintrusive to all but the long-running, memory-intense workloads where it's expected to make a (positive) difference. Short-run workloads like kbuild or hackbench don't trigger the NUMA code now. The limits can be reconsidered later on, iteratively - the goal now is to not regress. Thanks, Ingo --------------> Ingo Molnar (2): sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing include/linux/sched.h | 1 + kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++ kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- kernel/sched/features.h | 1 + kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++ 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/2] numa/core updates @ 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins I've been testing wider workloads and here's two more small and obvious patches rounding up numa/core behavior around the edges. The NUMA code should now be pretty unintrusive to all but the long-running, memory-intense workloads where it's expected to make a (positive) difference. Short-run workloads like kbuild or hackbench don't trigger the NUMA code now. The limits can be reconsidered later on, iteratively - the goal now is to not regress. Thanks, Ingo --------------> Ingo Molnar (2): sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing include/linux/sched.h | 1 + kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++ kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- kernel/sched/features.h | 1 + kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++ 6 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 1.7.11.7 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins Don't try to NUMA-balance hard-bound tasks in vein. This also makes it easier to compare hard-bound workloads against NUMA-balanced workloads, because the NUMA code will be completely inactive for those hard-bound tasks. ( Keep a debugging feature flag around: for development it makes sense to observe what NUMA balancing tries to do with hard-affine tasks. ) [ Note: the duplicated test condition will be consolidated in the next patch. ] Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++ kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++++ kernel/sched/features.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 85fd67c..69b18b3 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4664,6 +4664,12 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask) cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask); p->nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(new_mask); + +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING + /* Don't disturb hard-bound tasks: */ + if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE) && (p->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus())) + p->numa_shared = -1; +#endif } /* diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index 2cd3c1b..e10b714 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m) nr_switches = p->nvcsw + p->nivcsw; + P(nr_cpus_allowed); #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS PN(se.statistics.wait_start); PN(se.statistics.sleep_start); diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index eaff006..9667191 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2495,6 +2495,13 @@ static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || !curr->numa_faults) return; + /* Don't disturb hard-bound tasks: */ + if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE) && (curr->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus())) { + if (curr->numa_shared >= 0) + curr->numa_shared = -1; + return; + } + task_tick_numa_scan(rq, curr); task_tick_numa_placement(rq, curr); } diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h index 1775b80..5598f63 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/features.h +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(WAKE_ON_IDEAL_CPU, false) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA, true) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_BALANCE_ALL, false) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_BALANCE_INTERNODE, false) +SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE, true) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_LB, false) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_GROUP_LB_COMPRESS, true) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_GROUP_LB_SPREAD, true) -- 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic @ 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins Don't try to NUMA-balance hard-bound tasks in vein. This also makes it easier to compare hard-bound workloads against NUMA-balanced workloads, because the NUMA code will be completely inactive for those hard-bound tasks. ( Keep a debugging feature flag around: for development it makes sense to observe what NUMA balancing tries to do with hard-affine tasks. ) [ Note: the duplicated test condition will be consolidated in the next patch. ] Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++ kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++++ kernel/sched/features.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 85fd67c..69b18b3 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4664,6 +4664,12 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask) cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask); p->nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(new_mask); + +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING + /* Don't disturb hard-bound tasks: */ + if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE) && (p->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus())) + p->numa_shared = -1; +#endif } /* diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index 2cd3c1b..e10b714 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -448,6 +448,7 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m) nr_switches = p->nvcsw + p->nivcsw; + P(nr_cpus_allowed); #ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS PN(se.statistics.wait_start); PN(se.statistics.sleep_start); diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index eaff006..9667191 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2495,6 +2495,13 @@ static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || !curr->numa_faults) return; + /* Don't disturb hard-bound tasks: */ + if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE) && (curr->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus())) { + if (curr->numa_shared >= 0) + curr->numa_shared = -1; + return; + } + task_tick_numa_scan(rq, curr); task_tick_numa_placement(rq, curr); } diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h index 1775b80..5598f63 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/features.h +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(WAKE_ON_IDEAL_CPU, false) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA, true) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_BALANCE_ALL, false) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_BALANCE_INTERNODE, false) +SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE, true) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_LB, false) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_GROUP_LB_COMPRESS, true) SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_GROUP_LB_SPREAD, true) -- 1.7.11.7 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins NUMA-balancing, combined with NUMA-affine memory migration, is a relatively long-term process (compared to the typical time scale of scheduling) that takes time to establish and converge - on the time scale of of several seconds or more. Small, short-lived and don't have much of a NUMA placement cost to begin with, so don't NUMA-balance them. A task needs to execute long enough and needs to establish a large enough user-space memory image to benefit from more intelligent NUMA balancing. We already have a CPU time limit before tasks are affected by NUMA balancing - this change adds the memory equivalent: by introducing an RSS limit of 128 MBs. In practice this excludes most short-lived tasks - the limit is in fact probably a bit on the conservative side - but with intrusive kernel features conservative is good. The /proc/sys/kernel/sched_numa_rss_threshold_mb value can be tuned runtime - setting it to 0 turns off this filter. To implement the RSS filter first factor out a clean task_numa_candidate() function and comment on the various reasons of why we wouldn't want to begin to NUMA-balance a particular task (yet). Then add the RSS check. Note, we are using the p->hiwater_rss value instead of the current RSS size. We do this to avoid tasks flipping in and out of the limit, if their RSS fluctuates around the limit. The RSS high-water value increases monotonically in the life-time of a task, so there's a single, precise transition to NUMA-balancing as the limit is crossed. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index ce834e7..6a29dfd 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -2059,6 +2059,7 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_min; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_max; +extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_settle_count; #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 9667191..eb49f07 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -812,6 +812,8 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max __read_mostly = 100*16; /* ms */ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_min __read_mostly = 32; /* MB */ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_max __read_mostly = 512; /* MB */ +unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold __read_mostly = 128; /* MB */ + /* * Wait for the 2-sample stuff to settle before migrating again */ @@ -2486,17 +2488,53 @@ static void task_tick_numa_placement(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) task_work_add(curr, work, true); } -static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) +/* + * Is this task worth NUMA-scanning and NUMA-balancing? + */ +static bool task_numa_candidate(struct task_struct *p) { + unsigned long rss_pages; + + /* kthreads don't have any user-space memory to scan: */ + if (!p->mm || !p->numa_faults) + return false; + /* - * We don't care about NUMA placement if we don't have memory - * or are exiting: + * Exiting tasks won't touch any user-space memory in the future, + * and this also avoids a race with work_exit(): */ - if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || !curr->numa_faults) - return; + if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) + return false; /* Don't disturb hard-bound tasks: */ - if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE) && (curr->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus())) { + if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE)) { + if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus()) + return false; + } + + /* + * NUMA-balancing, combined with NUMA memory migration, + * is a long-term process that takes time to establish + * and converge, on the time scale of of several seconds + * or more. + * + * Small tasks are usually short-lived and don't have much + * of a NUMA placement cost to begin with, so don't + * NUMA-balance them: + */ + rss_pages = sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold; + rss_pages <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT; /* MB to pages */ + + if (p->mm->hiwater_rss < rss_pages) + return false; + + return true; +} + +static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) +{ + /* Cheap checks first: */ + if (!task_numa_candidate(curr)) { if (curr->numa_shared >= 0) curr->numa_shared = -1; return; diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c index b6ddfae..75ab895 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c @@ -388,6 +388,13 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = { .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, }, { + .procname = "sched_numa_rss_threshold_mb", + .data = &sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold, + .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, + }, + { .procname = "sched_numa_settle_count", .data = &sysctl_sched_numa_settle_count, .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), -- 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing @ 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins NUMA-balancing, combined with NUMA-affine memory migration, is a relatively long-term process (compared to the typical time scale of scheduling) that takes time to establish and converge - on the time scale of of several seconds or more. Small, short-lived and don't have much of a NUMA placement cost to begin with, so don't NUMA-balance them. A task needs to execute long enough and needs to establish a large enough user-space memory image to benefit from more intelligent NUMA balancing. We already have a CPU time limit before tasks are affected by NUMA balancing - this change adds the memory equivalent: by introducing an RSS limit of 128 MBs. In practice this excludes most short-lived tasks - the limit is in fact probably a bit on the conservative side - but with intrusive kernel features conservative is good. The /proc/sys/kernel/sched_numa_rss_threshold_mb value can be tuned runtime - setting it to 0 turns off this filter. To implement the RSS filter first factor out a clean task_numa_candidate() function and comment on the various reasons of why we wouldn't want to begin to NUMA-balance a particular task (yet). Then add the RSS check. Note, we are using the p->hiwater_rss value instead of the current RSS size. We do this to avoid tasks flipping in and out of the limit, if their RSS fluctuates around the limit. The RSS high-water value increases monotonically in the life-time of a task, so there's a single, precise transition to NUMA-balancing as the limit is crossed. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index ce834e7..6a29dfd 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -2059,6 +2059,7 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_min; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_max; +extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_settle_count; #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 9667191..eb49f07 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -812,6 +812,8 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max __read_mostly = 100*16; /* ms */ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_min __read_mostly = 32; /* MB */ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_max __read_mostly = 512; /* MB */ +unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold __read_mostly = 128; /* MB */ + /* * Wait for the 2-sample stuff to settle before migrating again */ @@ -2486,17 +2488,53 @@ static void task_tick_numa_placement(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) task_work_add(curr, work, true); } -static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) +/* + * Is this task worth NUMA-scanning and NUMA-balancing? + */ +static bool task_numa_candidate(struct task_struct *p) { + unsigned long rss_pages; + + /* kthreads don't have any user-space memory to scan: */ + if (!p->mm || !p->numa_faults) + return false; + /* - * We don't care about NUMA placement if we don't have memory - * or are exiting: + * Exiting tasks won't touch any user-space memory in the future, + * and this also avoids a race with work_exit(): */ - if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || !curr->numa_faults) - return; + if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) + return false; /* Don't disturb hard-bound tasks: */ - if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE) && (curr->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus())) { + if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE)) { + if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus()) + return false; + } + + /* + * NUMA-balancing, combined with NUMA memory migration, + * is a long-term process that takes time to establish + * and converge, on the time scale of of several seconds + * or more. + * + * Small tasks are usually short-lived and don't have much + * of a NUMA placement cost to begin with, so don't + * NUMA-balance them: + */ + rss_pages = sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold; + rss_pages <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT; /* MB to pages */ + + if (p->mm->hiwater_rss < rss_pages) + return false; + + return true; +} + +static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) +{ + /* Cheap checks first: */ + if (!task_numa_candidate(curr)) { if (curr->numa_shared >= 0) curr->numa_shared = -1; return; diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c index b6ddfae..75ab895 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c @@ -388,6 +388,13 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = { .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, }, { + .procname = "sched_numa_rss_threshold_mb", + .data = &sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold, + .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, + }, + { .procname = "sched_numa_settle_count", .data = &sysctl_sched_numa_settle_count, .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), -- 1.7.11.7 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2, v2] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 19:45 ` Ingo Molnar -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins Updated -v2 patch: RSS high-water calculation has a performance trick, so mm->hiwater_rss must be used together with get_mm_rss. Thanks, Ingo ---------------------------> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2, v2] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing @ 2012-12-02 19:45 ` Ingo Molnar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ingo Molnar @ 2012-12-02 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-mm Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Paul Turner, Lee Schermerhorn, Christoph Lameter, Rik van Riel, Mel Gorman, Andrew Morton, Andrea Arcangeli, Linus Torvalds, Thomas Gleixner, Johannes Weiner, Hugh Dickins Updated -v2 patch: RSS high-water calculation has a performance trick, so mm->hiwater_rss must be used together with get_mm_rss. Thanks, Ingo ---------------------------> >From 92429d012ddc551626d7e414469e080d4b41a0c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 15:29:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing NUMA-balancing, combined with NUMA-affine memory migration, is a relatively long-term process (compared to the typical time scale of scheduling) that takes time to establish and converge - on the time scale of of several seconds or more. Small, short-lived and don't have much of a NUMA placement cost to begin with, so don't NUMA-balance them. A task needs to execute long enough and needs to establish a large enough user-space memory image to benefit from more intelligent NUMA balancing. We already have a CPU time limit before tasks are affected by NUMA balancing - this change adds the memory equivalent: by introducing an RSS limit of 128 MBs. In practice this excludes most short-lived tasks - the limit is in fact probably a bit on the conservative side - but with intrusive kernel features conservative is good. The /proc/sys/kernel/sched_numa_rss_threshold_mb value can be tuned runtime - setting it to 0 turns off this filter. To implement the RSS filter first factor out a clean task_numa_candidate() function and comment on the various reasons of why we wouldn't want to begin to NUMA-balance a particular task (yet). Then add the RSS check. Note, we are using the p->hiwater_rss value instead of the current RSS size. We do this to avoid tasks flipping in and out of the limit, if their RSS fluctuates around the limit. The RSS high-water value increases monotonically in the life-time of a task, so there's a single, precise transition to NUMA-balancing as the limit is crossed. Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- include/linux/sched.h | 1 + kernel/sched/fair.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ kernel/sysctl.c | 7 +++++++ 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index ce834e7..6a29dfd 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -2059,6 +2059,7 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_min; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_min; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_max; +extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_settle_count; #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 9667191..21c10f7 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -812,6 +812,8 @@ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_period_max __read_mostly = 100*16; /* ms */ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_min __read_mostly = 32; /* MB */ unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_scan_size_max __read_mostly = 512; /* MB */ +unsigned int sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold __read_mostly = 128; /* MB */ + /* * Wait for the 2-sample stuff to settle before migrating again */ @@ -2486,17 +2488,57 @@ static void task_tick_numa_placement(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) task_work_add(curr, work, true); } -static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) +/* + * Is this task worth NUMA-scanning and NUMA-balancing? + */ +static bool task_numa_candidate(struct task_struct *p) { + unsigned long rss_high; + unsigned long rss_limit; + + /* kthreads don't have any user-space memory to scan: */ + if (!p->mm || !p->numa_faults) + return false; + /* - * We don't care about NUMA placement if we don't have memory - * or are exiting: + * Exiting tasks won't touch any user-space memory in the future, + * and this also avoids a race with work_exit(): */ - if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || !curr->numa_faults) - return; + if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) + return false; /* Don't disturb hard-bound tasks: */ - if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE) && (curr->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus())) { + if (sched_feat(NUMA_EXCLUDE_AFFINE)) { + if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != num_online_cpus()) + return false; + } + + /* + * NUMA-balancing, combined with NUMA memory migration, + * is a long-term process that takes time to establish + * and converge, on the time scale of of several seconds + * or more. + * + * Small tasks are usually short-lived and don't have much + * of a NUMA placement cost to begin with, so don't + * NUMA-balance them: + */ + rss_limit = sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold; + rss_limit <<= 20 - PAGE_SHIFT; /* MB to pages */ + + rss_high = get_mm_rss(p->mm); + rss_high = max(p->mm->hiwater_rss, rss_high); + + if (rss_high < rss_limit) + return false; + + return true; +} + +static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr) +{ + /* Cheap checks first: */ + if (!task_numa_candidate(curr)) { if (curr->numa_shared >= 0) curr->numa_shared = -1; return; diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c index b6ddfae..75ab895 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c @@ -388,6 +388,13 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = { .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, }, { + .procname = "sched_numa_rss_threshold_mb", + .data = &sysctl_sched_numa_rss_threshold, + .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, + }, + { .procname = "sched_numa_settle_count", .data = &sysctl_sched_numa_settle_count, .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int), ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-02 19:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-12-02 16:13 [PATCH 0/2] numa/core updates Ingo Molnar 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar 2012-12-02 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Exclude pinned tasks from the NUMA-balancing logic Ingo Molnar 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar 2012-12-02 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Add RSS filter to NUMA-balancing Ingo Molnar 2012-12-02 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar 2012-12-02 19:45 ` [PATCH 2/2, v2] " Ingo Molnar 2012-12-02 19:45 ` Ingo Molnar
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.