From: linux@prisktech.co.nz (Tony Prisk)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:09:30 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357758570.27076.8.camel@gitbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMj6XTuW9tPqYnawPvO-wJBd7s5M5xTfdvQcmEioHw=Pnw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 22:30 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> >> This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7).
> >>
> >> Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and
> >> unique features are specified by each SoC option.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
> >
> >
> > Hi Arnd, Olof,
> >
> > Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem?
>
> Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you
> wanted them applied.
>
> I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply
> them if all OK) tomorrow.
>
>
> -Olof
I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer.
Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so
everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches
have already been applied.
Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches?
Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already?
Regards
Tony P
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:09:30 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357758570.27076.8.camel@gitbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMj6XTuW9tPqYnawPvO-wJBd7s5M5xTfdvQcmEioHw=Pnw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 22:30 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:20 +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> >> This patch adds support for the WM8750 (ARMv6) and WM8850 (ARMv7).
> >>
> >> Common features across all SoCs are split into ARCH_VT8500 and
> >> unique features are specified by each SoC option.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
> >
> >
> > Hi Arnd, Olof,
> >
> > Haven't heard anything re: this patch series. Problem?
>
> Nope, just wasn't sure if you would send a git pull request or if you
> wanted them applied.
>
> I'm out of time for tonight, but I'll look closer at them (and apply
> them if all OK) tomorrow.
>
>
> -Olof
I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer.
Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so
everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches
have already been applied.
Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches?
Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already?
Regards
Tony P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-09 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-27 23:20 [PATCH 0/4] arm: vt8500: Add new models and remove single-platform Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850 Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 6:13 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 6:13 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 6:30 ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-09 6:30 ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-09 19:09 ` Tony Prisk [this message]
2013-01-09 19:09 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-10 2:03 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-10 2:03 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-10 10:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-10 10:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-10 18:32 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-10 18:32 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: vt8500: Remove single platform Kconfig options Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: vt8500: Convert debug-macro.S to be multiplatform friendly Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-28 4:21 ` Alexey Charkov
2012-12-28 8:09 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-28 8:09 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm: vt8500: Remove remaining mach includes Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-11 20:12 [PATCH 0/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850 Tony Prisk
2013-01-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Tony Prisk
2013-01-11 20:12 ` Tony Prisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357758570.27076.8.camel@gitbox \
--to=linux@prisktech.co.nz \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.