From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:21:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301101021.44238.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357783407.28830.2.camel@gitbox>
On Thursday 10 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already?
>
> This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request
> for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :)
>
Sorry, I think I misunderstood the question then. I meant that if
you received an Acked-by statement, it should be part of the
changeset comment by the time you send a pull request.
There is also the rule that patches need to be reviewed on the
mailing list before you submit them for inclusion. Like all
rules, this can be bent a little for patches that are obvious
correct bug fixes, especially when you are the platform
maintainer. What you can do here is send the patches out to the
mailing list without any additional Acks and send the pull
request as the [PATCH 0/X] mail. We can then look at the
patches if necessary or just pull in the branch straight away.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com, arm@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:21:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301101021.44238.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357783407.28830.2.camel@gitbox>
On Thursday 10 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already?
>
> This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request
> for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :)
>
Sorry, I think I misunderstood the question then. I meant that if
you received an Acked-by statement, it should be part of the
changeset comment by the time you send a pull request.
There is also the rule that patches need to be reviewed on the
mailing list before you submit them for inclusion. Like all
rules, this can be bent a little for patches that are obvious
correct bug fixes, especially when you are the platform
maintainer. What you can do here is send the patches out to the
mailing list without any additional Acks and send the pull
request as the [PATCH 0/X] mail. We can then look at the
patches if necessary or just pull in the branch straight away.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-10 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-27 23:20 [PATCH 0/4] arm: vt8500: Add new models and remove single-platform Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850 Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 6:13 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 6:13 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 6:30 ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-09 6:30 ` Olof Johansson
2013-01-09 19:09 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 19:09 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-09 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-09 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-10 2:03 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-10 2:03 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-10 10:21 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-01-10 10:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-10 18:32 ` Tony Prisk
2013-01-10 18:32 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: vt8500: Remove single platform Kconfig options Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: vt8500: Convert debug-macro.S to be multiplatform friendly Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-28 4:21 ` Alexey Charkov
2012-12-28 8:09 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-28 8:09 ` Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm: vt8500: Remove remaining mach includes Tony Prisk
2012-12-27 23:20 ` Tony Prisk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-11 20:12 [PATCH 0/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850 Tony Prisk
2013-01-11 20:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Tony Prisk
2013-01-11 20:12 ` Tony Prisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301101021.44238.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.