From: benh@kernel.crashing.org (Benjamin Herrenschmidt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:48:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381477716.5630.74.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381476448-14548-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 09:27 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt pointed a few issues in the proposed design of
> device tree bindings for contiguous memory allocator and reserved memory
> regions:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/15/151
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273548.html
Are you guys in Edinburgh ?
I'll be there from Tuesday PM (so really Wed) to Friday (fly out on
Sat). We should catch up, brainstorm and come up with something.
Cheers,
Ben.
> Some time has passed, but there is still no consensus on the bindings
> for the reserved memory and various drawback of this solution has been
> shown, so in my opinion the best I can do now is to revert them
> completely and start from scratch again later.
>
> This patch series reverts patches related to device tree bindings
> proposed in the following thread:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/263216
> and merged by commit 64c353864e3f7ccba0ade1bd6f562f9a3bc7e68d ("Merge
> branch 'for-v3.12' of git://git.linaro.org/people/mszyprowski/linux-dma-mapping").
>
> Best regards
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
> Marek Szyprowski (2):
> Revert "ARM: init: add support for reserved memory defined by device tree"
> Revert "drivers: of: add initialization code for dma reserved memory"
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory.txt | 168 -------------------------
> arch/arm/mm/init.c | 3 -
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 -
> drivers/of/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 173 --------------------------
> drivers/of/platform.c | 4 -
> include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h | 14 ---
> 7 files changed, 369 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory.txt
> delete mode 100644 drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Marc <marc.ceeeee@gmail.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Nishanth Peethambaran <nishanth.p@gmail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:48:36 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1381477716.5630.74.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381476448-14548-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 09:27 +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt pointed a few issues in the proposed design of
> device tree bindings for contiguous memory allocator and reserved memory
> regions:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/15/151
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273548.html
Are you guys in Edinburgh ?
I'll be there from Tuesday PM (so really Wed) to Friday (fly out on
Sat). We should catch up, brainstorm and come up with something.
Cheers,
Ben.
> Some time has passed, but there is still no consensus on the bindings
> for the reserved memory and various drawback of this solution has been
> shown, so in my opinion the best I can do now is to revert them
> completely and start from scratch again later.
>
> This patch series reverts patches related to device tree bindings
> proposed in the following thread:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/263216
> and merged by commit 64c353864e3f7ccba0ade1bd6f562f9a3bc7e68d ("Merge
> branch 'for-v3.12' of git://git.linaro.org/people/mszyprowski/linux-dma-mapping").
>
> Best regards
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
> Marek Szyprowski (2):
> Revert "ARM: init: add support for reserved memory defined by device tree"
> Revert "drivers: of: add initialization code for dma reserved memory"
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory.txt | 168 -------------------------
> arch/arm/mm/init.c | 3 -
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 -
> drivers/of/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 173 --------------------------
> drivers/of/platform.c | 4 -
> include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h | 14 ---
> 7 files changed, 369 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory.txt
> delete mode 100644 drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> delete mode 100644 include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-11 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-11 7:27 [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
[not found] ` < 20131030134702.19B57C402A0@trevor.secretlab.ca>
2013-10-11 7:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ARM: init: add support for reserved memory defined by device tree" Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drivers: of: add initialization code for dma reserved memory" Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2013-10-11 7:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-11 18:12 ` Kumar Gala
2013-10-11 18:12 ` Kumar Gala
2013-10-15 11:41 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-15 11:41 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-17 18:37 ` Matt Sealey
2013-10-17 18:37 ` Matt Sealey
2013-10-17 19:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-17 19:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-15 11:40 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-15 11:40 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-15 13:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-15 13:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-30 13:47 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-30 13:47 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-30 17:30 ` Matt Sealey
2013-10-30 17:30 ` Matt Sealey
2013-11-19 12:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-11-19 12:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-11-19 15:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-19 15:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-19 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-19 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-20 13:04 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-20 13:04 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1381477716.5630.74.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.