From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:27:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D42CE.5010008@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015114035.6CA5FC40098@trevor.secretlab.ca>
Hello,
On 2013-10-15 13:40, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:27:26 +0200, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt pointed a few issues in the proposed design of
> > device tree bindings for contiguous memory allocator and reserved memory
> > regions:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/15/151
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273548.html
> >
> > Some time has passed, but there is still no consensus on the bindings
> > for the reserved memory and various drawback of this solution has been
> > shown, so in my opinion the best I can do now is to revert them
> > completely and start from scratch again later.
>
> I had some fixup patches that I was getting ready to post, but your
> right. We're really late to be doing anything like that. I've applied
> the reverts and we'll plan on hammering something out in Edinburgh next
> week so that it can be merged for v3.13
Sadly I won't be able to go to Edinburgh because of other business trip
the same time. However Tomasz Figa will be there for the whole week, he
will also attend DT-summit, so I hope that you will manage to find a
consensus. I will implement whatever you will agree then.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linaro-mm-sig-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Kyungmin Park
<kyungmin.park-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Nazarewicz
<mina86-deATy8a+UHjQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
Ian Campbell
<ian.campbell-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Nishanth Peethambaran
<nishanth.p-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Marc <marc.ceeeee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:27:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D42CE.5010008@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015114035.6CA5FC40098-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
Hello,
On 2013-10-15 13:40, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2013 09:27:26 +0200, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt pointed a few issues in the proposed design of
> > device tree bindings for contiguous memory allocator and reserved memory
> > regions:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/15/151
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273548.html
> >
> > Some time has passed, but there is still no consensus on the bindings
> > for the reserved memory and various drawback of this solution has been
> > shown, so in my opinion the best I can do now is to revert them
> > completely and start from scratch again later.
>
> I had some fixup patches that I was getting ready to post, but your
> right. We're really late to be doing anything like that. I've applied
> the reverts and we'll plan on hammering something out in Edinburgh next
> week so that it can be merged for v3.13
Sadly I won't be able to go to Edinburgh because of other business trip
the same time. However Tomasz Figa will be there for the whole week, he
will also attend DT-summit, so I hope that you will manage to find a
consensus. I will implement whatever you will agree then.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-11 7:27 [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
[not found] ` < 20131030134702.19B57C402A0@trevor.secretlab.ca>
2013-10-11 7:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ARM: init: add support for reserved memory defined by device tree" Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "drivers: of: add initialization code for dma reserved memory" Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-11 7:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] Revert support for reserved memory regions defined in device tree Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-11 7:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-11 18:12 ` Kumar Gala
2013-10-11 18:12 ` Kumar Gala
2013-10-15 11:41 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-15 11:41 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-17 18:37 ` Matt Sealey
2013-10-17 18:37 ` Matt Sealey
2013-10-17 19:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-17 19:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-10-15 11:40 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-15 11:40 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-15 13:27 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2013-10-15 13:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-10-30 13:47 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-30 13:47 ` Grant Likely
2013-10-30 17:30 ` Matt Sealey
2013-10-30 17:30 ` Matt Sealey
2013-11-19 12:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-11-19 12:27 ` Marek Szyprowski
2013-11-19 15:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-19 15:14 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-19 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-19 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-11-20 13:04 ` Grant Likely
2013-11-20 13:04 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525D42CE.5010008@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.