From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm64: Add arch support for PCI
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:39:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382531997.14960.8.camel@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382529163-31968-1-git-send-email-tinamdar@apm.com>
Hi Tanmay,
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 12:52 +0100, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> This patch adds the PCI arch support in arm64 required by PCI
> midlayer. The PCI support is based on support in 32bit arm arch.
We had a discussion yesterday at the ARM mini-summit in Edinburgh about
PCI(e) support on ARMv8. Rather than creating yet another
implementation, there is a lot of code in there which is not arch
specific and should rather be generalised. There are still some debates
around whether to make the powerpc one generic (and it seems to have
some advantages in terms of DT handling) or making parts of the AArch32
implementation generic. ARM started looking into this but we don't yet
have code to share.
Catalin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: Add arch support for PCI
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:39:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382531997.14960.8.camel@mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382529163-31968-1-git-send-email-tinamdar@apm.com>
Hi Tanmay,
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 12:52 +0100, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> This patch adds the PCI arch support in arm64 required by PCI
> midlayer. The PCI support is based on support in 32bit arm arch.
We had a discussion yesterday at the ARM mini-summit in Edinburgh about
PCI(e) support on ARMv8. Rather than creating yet another
implementation, there is a lot of code in there which is not arch
specific and should rather be generalised. There are still some debates
around whether to make the powerpc one generic (and it seems to have
some advantages in terms of DT handling) or making parts of the AArch32
implementation generic. ARM started looking into this but we don't yet
have code to share.
Catalin
next parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-23 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1382529163-31968-1-git-send-email-tinamdar@apm.com>
2013-10-23 12:39 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-10-23 12:39 ` [RFC PATCH] arm64: Add arch support for PCI Catalin Marinas
2013-11-21 13:38 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2013-11-21 13:38 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-05-21 18:57 ` Kumar Gala
2014-05-21 18:57 ` Kumar Gala
2014-07-02 17:54 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-07-02 17:54 ` Tanmay Inamdar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382531997.14960.8.camel@mbp \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.