From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
chzigotzky@xenosoft.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix alignment of secondary cpu spin vars
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:09:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389154189.2076.5.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103081219.GA10233@quad.lixom.net>
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 00:12 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:56:04PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> > This makes things interesting though. The BE/LE trampoline code
> > assumes at least 3 consecutive instructions. What was the reasoning
> > behind entering the kernel LE instead of keeping the old boot protocol
> > and just switching to LE once kernel is loaded? Is it actually used on
> > some platforms or is this just a theoretical thing?
>
> Actually, adding a little hack that zeroes out the memory once we're done
> executing it will work just fine too. I know this is sort of icky, but maybe
> it'll be good enough for now?
>
> Of course, main worry is that this is just hiding some latent NULL deref in
> the kernel now... :-/
Wow, that would have to come close to winning the grossest-hack-in-arch-powerpc
award :)
Have you tried changing the value at 8 to point to a reserved page?
Some other possibilities:
* Change the #define so FIXUP_ENDIAN is empty for PASEMI, that would mean
you'd only be able to boot pasemi_defconfig.
* Move the hack into FIXUP_ENDIAN
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
chzigotzky@xenosoft.de,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix alignment of secondary cpu spin vars
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 15:09:49 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389154189.2076.5.camel@concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140103081219.GA10233@quad.lixom.net>
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 00:12 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:56:04PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> > This makes things interesting though. The BE/LE trampoline code
> > assumes at least 3 consecutive instructions. What was the reasoning
> > behind entering the kernel LE instead of keeping the old boot protocol
> > and just switching to LE once kernel is loaded? Is it actually used on
> > some platforms or is this just a theoretical thing?
>
> Actually, adding a little hack that zeroes out the memory once we're done
> executing it will work just fine too. I know this is sort of icky, but maybe
> it'll be good enough for now?
>
> Of course, main worry is that this is just hiding some latent NULL deref in
> the kernel now... :-/
Wow, that would have to come close to winning the grossest-hack-in-arch-powerpc
award :)
Have you tried changing the value at 8 to point to a reserved page?
Some other possibilities:
* Change the #define so FIXUP_ENDIAN is empty for PASEMI, that would mean
you'd only be able to boot pasemi_defconfig.
* Move the hack into FIXUP_ENDIAN
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-08 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-28 21:01 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix alignment of secondary cpu spin vars Olof Johansson
2013-12-28 21:01 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-28 21:05 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-28 21:05 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-03 7:56 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-03 7:56 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-03 8:12 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-03 8:12 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-08 4:09 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2014-01-08 4:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-01-08 4:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-08 4:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-08 17:48 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-08 17:48 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-09 1:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-01-09 1:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <52CDC12F.5030407@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <52D6E829.1050504@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <52D6E89C.7010407@xenosoft.de>
[not found] ` <52D6E928.7050307@xenosoft.de>
2014-01-22 10:18 ` [Bug 67811] PASEMI: Kernel 3.13.0 doesn't boot with a PA6T cpu Christian Zigotzky
2014-05-23 21:29 ` PASEMI: Kernel 3.15.0-rc6 " Christian Zigotzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389154189.2076.5.camel@concordia \
--to=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.