All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: OMAP: clock DT conversion issues with omap36xx
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:21:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1390994505.5023.32.camel@mars> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1390928565.4904.88.camel@mars>

On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 18:02 +0100, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 15:40 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > 
> > >> Due to a regression since next-20140122 the following errors are present:
> > >>
> > >>   - pin sys_clkout2, which gets configured to 24 Mhz by the fourth patch
> > >>     in this set, erroneously outputs only 12 Mhz.
> > >>     Just out of curiosity, configuring it to 48 Mhz puts out desired 24 Mhz.
> > >>
> > >>   - omap_dss, which gets configured by the third patch in this set, fails
> > >>     to do 'dss_set_fck_rate(fck);' in
> > >>     drivers/video/omap2/dss/dss.c:dss_setup_default_clock() which leads to:
> > >>
> > >>      | omapdss_dss: probe of omapdss_dss failed with error -22
> > >>      | omapdss CORE error: Failed to initialize DSS platform driver
> > >>      | panel-dpi panel-dpi.0: failed to find video source 'dpi.0
> > >>
> > >>    Both regressions seem to have something to do with the clock framework.
> > >>    Could this be related to the DT clock conversion patches?
> > >
> > 
> > Yea its definitely possible, as the clock DT conversion touches pretty 
> > much everything. Have you tried whether this works properly with legacy 
> > boot? Personally I don't have access to any omap3 devices that would 
> > have display and have no possibility to check this out myself. Anyway, 
> > my initial guess is that some clock divider setup might be wrong with 
> > omap3, or we are missing some ti,set-rate-parent flag for some clock 
> > node which prevents escalating clk_set_rate properly. However, it should 
> > be easy to debug this by looking at the clock node in question, and its 
> > parent nodes to see if there are any problems.
> 
> Currently I only analyzed sys_clkout2 (see attachments for full
> clk_summary files):
> 
> clk_summary__next-20140115__works_as_expected:
>              dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
>                 dpll4_m2x2_ck   1           1            96000000
>                    omap_192m_alwon_fck 1           1            96000000
>                       omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            96000000
>                          per_96m_fck 0           6            96000000
>                             mcbsp4_fck 0           1            96000000
>                             mcbsp3_fck 0           2            96000000
>                             mcbsp2_fck 0           2            96000000
>                          cm_96m_fck 2           3            96000000
>                             clkout2_src_ck 1           1            96000000
>                                sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000
> 
> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are correctly 24 Mhz measured.
> 
> clk_summary__next-20140124__sysclkout2_dss_fails:
>              dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
>                 dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1           1            192000000
>                    dpll4_m2x2_ck 1           1            192000000
>                       omap_192m_alwon_fck 0           0            192000000
>                       omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            192000000
>                          per_96m_fck 0           6            192000000
>                             mcbsp4_fck 0           1            192000000
>                             mcbsp3_fck 0           2            192000000
>                             mcbsp2_fck 0           2            192000000
>                          cm_96m_fck 2           3            192000000
>                             clkout2_src_ck 1           1            192000000
>                                sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000
> 
> For real, on pin sys_clkout2 are only ~12 Mhz measured.
> 
> So I added this patch:
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: fix omap3 clock multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck
> 
> Before DT clock conversion, there was no multiplier for dpll4_m2x2_ck.
> So to be compatible again, set dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck multiplier back to 1.
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> index cb04d4b..b594050 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3xxx-clocks.dtsi
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
>  		#clock-cells = <0>;
>  		compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
>  		clocks = <&dpll4_m2_ck>;
> -		clock-mult = <2>;
> +		clock-mult = <1>;
>  		clock-div = <1>;
>  	};
>
> And it works again. But due to the fact that sys_clkout2 was at 12 Mhz
> instead of 24, shouldn't it have been at 48 caused by "clock-mult = 2 ?

Any ideas on that?

I reverted the patch above and added:

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 11:03:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap36xx: fix omap96m_alwon_fck

OMAP36xx has different hardware implementation for the omap96m_alwon_fck
compared to other OMAP3 variants. Reflect this properly in the dts file.

Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
---
  arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi |    9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
index 2fcf253..24ddf3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap36xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -88,3 +88,12 @@
  			 <&mcbsp4_ick>, <&uart4_fck>;
  	};
  };
+
+&omap_96m_alwon_fck {
+	compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+	clocks = <&omap_192m_alwon_fck>;
+	ti,bit-shift = <12>;
+	ti,max-div = <2>;
+	reg = <0x0a40>;
+	ti,index-starts-at-one;
+};

But the output of sys_clkout2 is still wrong.

clk_summary__next-20140124__patch_tero_fix_omap96m_alwon_fck
             dpll4_m2_ck        1           1            96000000
                dpll4_m2x2_mul_ck 1           1            192000000
                   dpll4_m2x2_ck 1           1            192000000
                      omap_192m_alwon_fck 1           1            192000000
                         omap_96m_alwon_fck 1           2            192000000
                            per_96m_fck 0           6            192000000
                               mcbsp4_fck 0           1            192000000
                               mcbsp3_fck 0           2            192000000
                               mcbsp2_fck 0           2            192000000
                            cm_96m_fck 2           3            192000000
                               clkout2_src_ck 1           1            192000000
                                  sys_clkout2 1           1            24000000

Thanks
  -- Christoph

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-29 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-27 17:30 [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-27 18:41 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-28  9:04   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  9:04     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  9:35     ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-28  9:48       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  9:48         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28 13:40         ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-28 13:40           ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-28 17:02           ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-29 11:21             ` Christoph Fritz [this message]
2014-01-29 14:57               ` OMAP: clock DT conversion issues with omap36xx Tero Kristo
2014-01-29 14:57                 ` Tero Kristo
2014-02-01 18:55                 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-29 19:03               ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-29 19:03                 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-01 18:52                 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-02 20:09                   ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-04 15:50               ` Tero Kristo
2014-02-04 15:50                 ` Tero Kristo
2014-02-07 10:12                 ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-07 13:49                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-07 13:49                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-10 20:54                     ` Christoph Fritz
2014-02-11 14:53                       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-11 14:53                         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-12 13:18                   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-12 13:18                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-12 22:30                     ` Belisko Marek
2014-02-13  9:03                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-13  9:03                       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-13 10:05                       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-13 10:05                         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-14  2:18                         ` Christoph Fritz
2014-01-28  7:50 ` [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  7:50   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  8:48   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28  8:48     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-28 18:17     ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-29  9:10       ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-29  9:10         ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-29  9:29         ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-29  9:38           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-29  9:38             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-29  9:50             ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-29  9:50               ` Tero Kristo
2014-01-29 11:30       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-29 11:30         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-29 18:52         ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-30  6:04           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-30  6:04             ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1390994505.5023.32.camel@mars \
    --to=chf.fritz@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.