[PATCH 11/18] extcon: max14577: Add max14577 prefix to muic_irqs

[k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)]

On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 09:47 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Following patch has conflict on extcon-next branch(Linus 3.14-rc1)
> when apply patchset by using git am.
> 
> [PATCH 11/18] extcon: max14577: Add max14577 prefix to muic_irqs
> [PATCH 12/18] extcon: max14577: Choose muic_irqs according to device type
> [PATCH 14/18] extcon: max14577: Add support for max77836
> 
> The base commit of this patchset isn't mainline. You need to rebase this patchset 
> on extcon-next branch and please resend this patchset.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chanwoo Choi

Hi,

This patch patch (along with other) depends on previous rename patches
from this patchset:
[PATCH 07/18] mfd: max14577: Rename and add MAX14577 symbols to prepare
for max77836
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1636674

I can resolve the conflict but then they will return on applying patch
7/18.

I think this patch may wait for a little until the rename-like patches
will be accepted.

Can you ACK other patches touch extcon?
 - [PATCH 07/18] mfd: max14577: Rename and add MAX14577 symbols...
 - [PATCH 08/18] mfd: max14577: Rename state container to maxim_core
 - [PATCH 09/18] mfd: max14577: Add "muic" suffix to regmap and irq_chip

Best regards,
Krzysztof

> On 01/28/2014 09:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Add max14577 prefix to muic_irqs array. This prepares for max77836
> > support in this extcon driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c |   12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c
> > index fd48b4909470..fb343f4042d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c
> > +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-max14577.c
> > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ struct max14577_muic_irq {
> >  	unsigned int virq;
> >  };
> >  
> > -static struct max14577_muic_irq muic_irqs[] = {
> > +static struct max14577_muic_irq max14577_muic_irqs[] = {
> >  	{ MAXIM_IRQ_INT1_ADC,		"muic-ADC" },
> >  	{ MAXIM_IRQ_INT1_ADCLOW,	"muic-ADCLOW" },
> >  	{ MAXIM_IRQ_INT1_ADCERR,	"muic-ADCError" },
> > @@ -541,9 +541,9 @@ static irqreturn_t max14577_muic_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> >  	 * However we only need to know whether it was ADC, charger
> >  	 * or both interrupts so decode IRQ and turn on proper flags.
> >  	 */
> > -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(muic_irqs); i++)
> > -		if (irq == muic_irqs[i].virq)
> > -			irq_type = muic_irqs[i].irq;
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(max14577_muic_irqs); i++)
> > +		if (irq == max14577_muic_irqs[i].virq)
> > +			irq_type = max14577_muic_irqs[i].irq;
> >  
> >  	switch (irq_type) {
> >  	case MAXIM_IRQ_INT1_ADC:
> > @@ -647,8 +647,8 @@ static int max14577_muic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	INIT_WORK(&info->irq_work, max14577_muic_irq_work);
> >  
> >  	/* Support irq domain for max14577 MUIC device */
> > -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(muic_irqs); i++) {
> > -		struct max14577_muic_irq *muic_irq = &muic_irqs[i];
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(max14577_muic_irqs); i++) {
> > +		struct max14577_muic_irq *muic_irq = &max14577_muic_irqs[i];
> >  		unsigned int virq = 0;
> >  
> >  		virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(maxim_core->irq_data_muic,
> >