All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Cc: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:10:23 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392001823.3996.21.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207165801.GC2107@lst.de>

On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 17:58 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>  typedef struct {
> -       volatile unsigned int slock;
> -} arch_spinlock_t;
> +       union {
> +               __ticketpair_t head_tail;
> +               struct __raw_tickets {
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__          /* The "tail" part should be in the MSBs */
> +                       __ticket_t tail, head;
> +#else
> +                       __ticket_t head, tail;
> +#endif
> +               } tickets;
> +       };
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
> +       u32 holder;
> +#endif
> +} arch_spinlock_t __aligned(4);

That's still broken with lockref (which we just merged).

We must have the arch_spinlock_t and the ref in the same 64-bit word
otherwise it will break.

We can make it work in theory since the holder doesn't have to be
accessed atomically, but the practicals are a complete mess ...
lockref would essentially have to re-implement the holder handling
of the spinlocks and use lower level ticket stuff.

Unless you can find a sneaky trick ... :-(

Ben.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:10:23 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392001823.3996.21.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207165801.GC2107@lst.de>

On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 17:58 +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
>  typedef struct {
> -       volatile unsigned int slock;
> -} arch_spinlock_t;
> +       union {
> +               __ticketpair_t head_tail;
> +               struct __raw_tickets {
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__          /* The "tail" part should be in the MSBs */
> +                       __ticket_t tail, head;
> +#else
> +                       __ticket_t head, tail;
> +#endif
> +               } tickets;
> +       };
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
> +       u32 holder;
> +#endif
> +} arch_spinlock_t __aligned(4);

That's still broken with lockref (which we just merged).

We must have the arch_spinlock_t and the ref in the same 64-bit word
otherwise it will break.

We can make it work in theory since the holder doesn't have to be
accessed atomically, but the practicals are a complete mess ...
lockref would essentially have to re-implement the holder handling
of the spinlocks and use lower level ticket stuff.

Unless you can find a sneaky trick ... :-(

Ben.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10  3:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07 16:58 [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks Torsten Duwe
2014-02-07 16:58 ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-07 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-07 17:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-07 17:55   ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-07 17:55     ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10  3:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2014-02-10  3:10   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-10 15:52   ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10 15:52     ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10 17:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 17:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11  2:44     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  2:44       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  2:56       ` Al Viro
2014-02-11  2:56         ` Al Viro
2014-02-11  3:38         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  3:38           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  9:53   ` Raghavendra KT
2014-02-11  9:53     ` Raghavendra KT
2014-02-11 10:40     ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-11 10:40       ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-11 18:30       ` Scott Wood
2014-02-11 18:30         ` Scott Wood
2014-02-11 19:34         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11 19:34           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  9:39 ` Raghavendra KT
2014-02-11  9:39   ` Raghavendra KT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1392001823.3996.21.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=duwe@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=tommusta@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.