All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Cc: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:12:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207171224.GR5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207165801.GC2107@lst.de>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:58:01PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> +static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> +	register struct __raw_tickets old, tmp,
> +		inc = { .tail = TICKET_LOCK_INC };
> +
>  	CLEAR_IO_SYNC;
> +	__asm__ __volatile__(
> +"1:	lwarx	%0,0,%4		# arch_spin_lock\n"
> +"	add	%1,%3,%0\n"
> +	PPC405_ERR77(0, "%4")
> +"	stwcx.	%1,0,%4\n"
> +"	bne-	1b"
> +	: "=&r" (old), "=&r" (tmp), "+m" (lock->tickets)
> +	: "r" (inc), "r" (&lock->tickets)
> +	: "cc");
> +
> +	if (likely(old.head == old.tail))
> +		goto out;

I would have expected an lwsync someplace hereabouts.

> +	for (;;) {
> +		unsigned count = 100;
> +
>  		do {
> +			if (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == old.tail)
> +				goto out;
>  			HMT_low();
>  			if (SHARED_PROCESSOR)
>  				__spin_yield(lock);
> +		} while (--count);
>  		HMT_medium();
>  	}
> +out:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
> +	lock->holder = LOCK_TOKEN;
> +#endif
> +	barrier();	/* make sure nothing creeps before the lock is taken */
>  }
>  
>  static inline

> @@ -147,10 +220,21 @@ void arch_spin_lock_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
>  
>  static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> +	arch_spinlock_t old, new;
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
> +	lock->holder = 0;
> +#endif
> +	do {
> +		old.tickets = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +		new.tickets.head = old.tickets.head + TICKET_LOCK_INC;
> +		new.tickets.tail = old.tickets.tail;
> +	} while (unlikely(__arch_spin_cmpxchg_eq(lock,
> +						 old.head_tail,
> +						 new.head_tail)));
>  	SYNC_IO;
>  	__asm__ __volatile__("# arch_spin_unlock\n\t"
>  				PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER: : :"memory");

Doens't your cmpxchg_eq not already imply a lwsync?

> -	lock->slock = 0;
>  }

I'm still failing to see why you need an ll/sc pair for unlock.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:12:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140207171224.GR5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140207165801.GC2107@lst.de>

On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:58:01PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> +static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> +	register struct __raw_tickets old, tmp,
> +		inc = { .tail = TICKET_LOCK_INC };
> +
>  	CLEAR_IO_SYNC;
> +	__asm__ __volatile__(
> +"1:	lwarx	%0,0,%4		# arch_spin_lock\n"
> +"	add	%1,%3,%0\n"
> +	PPC405_ERR77(0, "%4")
> +"	stwcx.	%1,0,%4\n"
> +"	bne-	1b"
> +	: "=&r" (old), "=&r" (tmp), "+m" (lock->tickets)
> +	: "r" (inc), "r" (&lock->tickets)
> +	: "cc");
> +
> +	if (likely(old.head == old.tail))
> +		goto out;

I would have expected an lwsync someplace hereabouts.

> +	for (;;) {
> +		unsigned count = 100;
> +
>  		do {
> +			if (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == old.tail)
> +				goto out;
>  			HMT_low();
>  			if (SHARED_PROCESSOR)
>  				__spin_yield(lock);
> +		} while (--count);
>  		HMT_medium();
>  	}
> +out:
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
> +	lock->holder = LOCK_TOKEN;
> +#endif
> +	barrier();	/* make sure nothing creeps before the lock is taken */
>  }
>  
>  static inline

> @@ -147,10 +220,21 @@ void arch_spin_lock_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
>  
>  static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> +	arch_spinlock_t old, new;
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
> +	lock->holder = 0;
> +#endif
> +	do {
> +		old.tickets = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +		new.tickets.head = old.tickets.head + TICKET_LOCK_INC;
> +		new.tickets.tail = old.tickets.tail;
> +	} while (unlikely(__arch_spin_cmpxchg_eq(lock,
> +						 old.head_tail,
> +						 new.head_tail)));
>  	SYNC_IO;
>  	__asm__ __volatile__("# arch_spin_unlock\n\t"
>  				PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER: : :"memory");

Doens't your cmpxchg_eq not already imply a lwsync?

> -	lock->slock = 0;
>  }

I'm still failing to see why you need an ll/sc pair for unlock.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-07 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-07 16:58 [PATCH v2] powerpc ticket locks Torsten Duwe
2014-02-07 16:58 ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-07 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-02-07 17:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-07 17:55   ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-07 17:55     ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10  3:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-10  3:10   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-10 15:52   ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10 15:52     ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-10 17:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 17:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11  2:44     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  2:44       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  2:56       ` Al Viro
2014-02-11  2:56         ` Al Viro
2014-02-11  3:38         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  3:38           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  9:53   ` Raghavendra KT
2014-02-11  9:53     ` Raghavendra KT
2014-02-11 10:40     ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-11 10:40       ` Torsten Duwe
2014-02-11 18:30       ` Scott Wood
2014-02-11 18:30         ` Scott Wood
2014-02-11 19:34         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11 19:34           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-02-11  9:39 ` Raghavendra KT
2014-02-11  9:39   ` Raghavendra KT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140207171224.GR5002@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=duwe@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=tommusta@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.