From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Cc: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kexec: Fix make headers_check
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:12:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412604734.4054.72.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409402838.21896.99.camel@x220>
Hi Geoff,
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 14:47 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> [Added Peter Anvin.]
>
> On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:22 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 06:39:47PM +0000, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > > Remove the unneded declaration for a kexec_load() routine.
> > >
> > > Fixes errors like these when running 'make headers_check':
> > >
> > > include/uapi/linux/kexec.h: userspace cannot reference function or variable defined in the kernel
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> >
> > I think Paul Bolle tried to remove this in the past and maximilian
> > had objections.
> >
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2014-January/010902.html
>
> I've wanted to resend my patch, perhaps with a new commit explanation,
> for quite some time now. I never got around doing that.
>
> > I can't see that how exporting kernel prototype helps here.
>
> It doesn't, for the reasons I've set out in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2014-January/010900.html . In
> short: why bother using this prototype if one still needs to define the
> matching function oneself?
>
> > kexec-tools
> > seems to be using syscall(__NR_kexec_load) directly for non-xen case. So
> > I would be fine with removing this definition. Just trying to make sure
> > that it does not break any other library or users of this declaration.
>
> Obviously, this can only break compiling those libraries, or other
> users. It can't break already compiled binaries. Besides I don't think
> those libraries, etc actually exist. Maximilian mentioned klibc in
> January, but I wasn't able to find a version of klibc that cared about
> this prototype. No one pointed me at a version that does (or any other
> library, etc., for that matter).
>
> (If we do decide to keep this prototype, we should special case this
> prototype in headers_check.pl just to silence the build.)
>
> The above can be summarized like this:
> Acked-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
It seems not much happened after I added my Acked-by. I assume you still
want to get this merged. Is that correct?
Paul Bolle
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Cc: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kexec: Fix make headers_check
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:12:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412604734.4054.72.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409402838.21896.99.camel@x220>
Hi Geoff,
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 14:47 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> [Added Peter Anvin.]
>
> On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:22 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 06:39:47PM +0000, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > > Remove the unneded declaration for a kexec_load() routine.
> > >
> > > Fixes errors like these when running 'make headers_check':
> > >
> > > include/uapi/linux/kexec.h: userspace cannot reference function or variable defined in the kernel
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> >
> > I think Paul Bolle tried to remove this in the past and maximilian
> > had objections.
> >
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2014-January/010902.html
>
> I've wanted to resend my patch, perhaps with a new commit explanation,
> for quite some time now. I never got around doing that.
>
> > I can't see that how exporting kernel prototype helps here.
>
> It doesn't, for the reasons I've set out in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2014-January/010900.html . In
> short: why bother using this prototype if one still needs to define the
> matching function oneself?
>
> > kexec-tools
> > seems to be using syscall(__NR_kexec_load) directly for non-xen case. So
> > I would be fine with removing this definition. Just trying to make sure
> > that it does not break any other library or users of this declaration.
>
> Obviously, this can only break compiling those libraries, or other
> users. It can't break already compiled binaries. Besides I don't think
> those libraries, etc actually exist. Maximilian mentioned klibc in
> January, but I wasn't able to find a version of klibc that cared about
> this prototype. No one pointed me at a version that does (or any other
> library, etc., for that matter).
>
> (If we do decide to keep this prototype, we should special case this
> prototype in headers_check.pl just to silence the build.)
>
> The above can be summarized like this:
> Acked-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
It seems not much happened after I added my Acked-by. I assume you still
want to get this merged. Is that correct?
Paul Bolle
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kexec: Fix make headers_check
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:12:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412604734.4054.72.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409402838.21896.99.camel@x220>
Hi Geoff,
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 14:47 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> [Added Peter Anvin.]
>
> On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:22 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 06:39:47PM +0000, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > > Remove the unneded declaration for a kexec_load() routine.
> > >
> > > Fixes errors like these when running 'make headers_check':
> > >
> > > include/uapi/linux/kexec.h: userspace cannot reference function or variable defined in the kernel
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> >
> > I think Paul Bolle tried to remove this in the past and maximilian
> > had objections.
> >
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2014-January/010902.html
>
> I've wanted to resend my patch, perhaps with a new commit explanation,
> for quite some time now. I never got around doing that.
>
> > I can't see that how exporting kernel prototype helps here.
>
> It doesn't, for the reasons I've set out in
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2014-January/010900.html . In
> short: why bother using this prototype if one still needs to define the
> matching function oneself?
>
> > kexec-tools
> > seems to be using syscall(__NR_kexec_load) directly for non-xen case. So
> > I would be fine with removing this definition. Just trying to make sure
> > that it does not break any other library or users of this declaration.
>
> Obviously, this can only break compiling those libraries, or other
> users. It can't break already compiled binaries. Besides I don't think
> those libraries, etc actually exist. Maximilian mentioned klibc in
> January, but I wasn't able to find a version of klibc that cared about
> this prototype. No one pointed me at a version that does (or any other
> library, etc., for that matter).
>
> (If we do decide to keep this prototype, we should special case this
> prototype in headers_check.pl just to silence the build.)
>
> The above can be summarized like this:
> Acked-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
It seems not much happened after I added my Acked-by. I assume you still
want to get this merged. Is that correct?
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-06 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-22 18:39 [PATCH 0/5] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/5] kexec: Add bit definitions for kimage entry flags Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-25 17:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-22 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] kexec: Add IND_FLAGS macro Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-25 17:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-22 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] kexec: Fix make headers_check Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-25 17:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-30 12:47 ` Paul Bolle
2014-08-30 12:47 ` Paul Bolle
2014-08-30 12:47 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-06 14:12 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-10-06 14:12 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-06 14:12 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-06 17:34 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 17:34 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 17:34 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 18:21 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-06 18:21 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-06 18:21 ` Paul Bolle
2014-10-06 19:28 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 19:28 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 19:28 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 17:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-06 17:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-06 17:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-22 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/kexec: Use global IND_FLAGS macro Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] kexec: Simplify conditional Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-22 18:39 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-25 17:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 17:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 16:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 16:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-25 16:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-26 7:41 ` Dave Young
2014-08-26 7:41 ` Dave Young
2014-08-26 7:41 ` Dave Young
2014-08-27 0:33 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-27 0:33 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-27 0:33 ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-27 0:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-27 0:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-08-27 0:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 0:21 ` [PATCH V2 0/5] kexec: Minor " Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` [PATCH V23/5] kexec: Add bit definitions for kimage entry flags Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` [PATCH V25/5] powerpc/kexec: Use global IND_FLAGS macro Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 17:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 17:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 17:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-11-12 19:29 ` [PATCH V3] kexec: Add " Geoff Levand
2014-11-12 19:29 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-12 19:29 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-12 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-11-12 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-11-12 23:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-10-07 0:21 ` [PATCH V21/5] kexec: Fix make headers_check Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` [PATCH V22/5] kexec: Simplify conditional Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` [PATCH V24/5] kexec: Add IND_FLAGS macro Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 0:21 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 20:26 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] " Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 20:26 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 20:26 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` [PATCH V3 0/4] kexec: minor fixups and enhancements Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] kexec: Fix make headers_check Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] kexec: Simplify conditional Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] kexec: Add IND_FLAGS macro Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] kexec: Add bit definitions for kimage entry flags Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13 0:19 ` Geoff Levand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412604734.4054.72.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=max@stro.at \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.