All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	x86@kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:23:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1414002190.30946.95.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGSiXf2gpB8QQOQOmgxFc8mx31V6qeRqow6aXO1195jWEA@mail.gmail.com>

That's really serious.  Looking now.

On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:08 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Hi
> 
> (Cc'ing everybody mentioned in the original patch)
> 
> I work for Intel, on our Linux Graphics driver - aka i915.ko - and our
> QA team recently reported a regression on:
> 
> commit b4f0d3755c5e9cc86292d5fd78261903b4f23d4a
> Author: Richard Guy Briggs
> Date:   Tue Mar 4 10:38:06 2014 -0500
>     audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
> 
> According to our QA, their i386 machine doesn't boot anymore. I tried
> to write my own revert for the patch, asked QA to test, and they
> confirmed it "solves" the problem.
> 
> Here are the details of QA' s bug report:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85277 .
> 
> The trees our QA tests are the development trees from i915.ko:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel?h=drm-intel-fixes .
> 
> I tried searching for other bug reports on the same patch, but
> couldn't find any. Forgive me if this bug was already reported.
> 
> Feel free to continue this discussion on the bugzilla report if you want.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paulo
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 14:23:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1414002190.30946.95.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gsUGSiXf2gpB8QQOQOmgxFc8mx31V6qeRqow6aXO1195jWEA@mail.gmail.com>

That's really serious.  Looking now.

On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:08 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Hi
> 
> (Cc'ing everybody mentioned in the original patch)
> 
> I work for Intel, on our Linux Graphics driver - aka i915.ko - and our
> QA team recently reported a regression on:
> 
> commit b4f0d3755c5e9cc86292d5fd78261903b4f23d4a
> Author: Richard Guy Briggs
> Date:   Tue Mar 4 10:38:06 2014 -0500
>     audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
> 
> According to our QA, their i386 machine doesn't boot anymore. I tried
> to write my own revert for the patch, asked QA to test, and they
> confirmed it "solves" the problem.
> 
> Here are the details of QA' s bug report:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85277 .
> 
> The trees our QA tests are the development trees from i915.ko:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel?h=drm-intel-fixes .
> 
> I tried searching for other bug reports on the same patch, but
> couldn't find any. Forgive me if this bug was already reported.
> 
> Feel free to continue this discussion on the bugzilla report if you want.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paulo
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-22 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-22 18:08 Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface Paulo Zanoni
2014-10-22 18:08 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-10-22 18:23 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2014-10-22 18:23   ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 19:01   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 19:01     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 19:16     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 19:16       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 19:20       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 19:20         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 21:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-22 21:38     ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 21:38       ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 21:43       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-22 21:44         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 21:44           ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 22:44         ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 22:44           ` Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1414002190.30946.95.camel@localhost \
    --to=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.