From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
x86@kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:38:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1414013897.30946.102.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410222323500.5308@nanos>
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 23:36 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > That's really serious. Looking now.
>
> Indeed its serious. And it's even more serious as this masterpiece of
> assembly wreckage was pulled in via your tree w/o having an acked-by
> one of the x86 maintainers.
>
> > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:08 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > commit b4f0d3755c5e9cc86292d5fd78261903b4f23d4a
> > > Author: Richard Guy Briggs
> > > Date: Tue Mar 4 10:38:06 2014 -0500
> > > audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
> > >
> > > According to our QA, their i386 machine doesn't boot anymore. I tried
> > > to write my own revert for the patch, asked QA to test, and they
> > > confirmed it "solves" the problem.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> index 0d0c9d4ab6d5..f9e3fabc8716 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> @@ -449,12 +449,11 @@ sysenter_audit:
> jnz syscall_trace_entry
> addl $4,%esp
> CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -4
> - /* %esi already in 8(%esp) 6th arg: 4th syscall arg */
> - /* %edx already in 4(%esp) 5th arg: 3rd syscall arg */
> - /* %ecx already in 0(%esp) 4th arg: 2nd syscall arg */
> - movl %ebx,%ecx /* 3rd arg: 1st syscall arg */
> - movl %eax,%edx /* 2nd arg: syscall number */
> - movl $AUDIT_ARCH_I386,%eax /* 1st arg: audit arch */
> + movl %esi,4(%esp) /* 5th arg: 4th syscall arg */
> + movl %edx,(%esp) /* 4th arg: 3rd syscall arg */
>
> Bilndly overwriting the stack which holds the syscall arguments is
> really a brilliant way to ensure security.
It was sent, numerous times, to the x86 list for reviews, and lived in
-next for 2 complete devel cycles without a complaint. I'm trying to
get an i386 system to test a fix. But yes, it's total crap.
-Eric
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-audit@redhat.com,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:38:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1414013897.30946.102.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1410222323500.5308@nanos>
On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 23:36 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > That's really serious. Looking now.
>
> Indeed its serious. And it's even more serious as this masterpiece of
> assembly wreckage was pulled in via your tree w/o having an acked-by
> one of the x86 maintainers.
>
> > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:08 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > commit b4f0d3755c5e9cc86292d5fd78261903b4f23d4a
> > > Author: Richard Guy Briggs
> > > Date: Tue Mar 4 10:38:06 2014 -0500
> > > audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
> > >
> > > According to our QA, their i386 machine doesn't boot anymore. I tried
> > > to write my own revert for the patch, asked QA to test, and they
> > > confirmed it "solves" the problem.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> index 0d0c9d4ab6d5..f9e3fabc8716 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> @@ -449,12 +449,11 @@ sysenter_audit:
> jnz syscall_trace_entry
> addl $4,%esp
> CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -4
> - /* %esi already in 8(%esp) 6th arg: 4th syscall arg */
> - /* %edx already in 4(%esp) 5th arg: 3rd syscall arg */
> - /* %ecx already in 0(%esp) 4th arg: 2nd syscall arg */
> - movl %ebx,%ecx /* 3rd arg: 1st syscall arg */
> - movl %eax,%edx /* 2nd arg: syscall number */
> - movl $AUDIT_ARCH_I386,%eax /* 1st arg: audit arch */
> + movl %esi,4(%esp) /* 5th arg: 4th syscall arg */
> + movl %edx,(%esp) /* 4th arg: 3rd syscall arg */
>
> Bilndly overwriting the stack which holds the syscall arguments is
> really a brilliant way to ensure security.
It was sent, numerous times, to the x86 list for reviews, and lived in
-next for 2 complete devel cycles without a complaint. I'm trying to
get an i386 system to test a fix. But yes, it's total crap.
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-22 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-22 18:08 Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface Paulo Zanoni
2014-10-22 18:08 ` Paulo Zanoni
2014-10-22 18:23 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 18:23 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 19:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 19:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 19:16 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 19:16 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-10-22 19:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 19:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-10-22 21:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-10-22 21:38 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2014-10-22 21:38 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 21:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-10-22 21:44 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 21:44 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 22:44 ` Eric Paris
2014-10-22 22:44 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1414013897.30946.102.camel@localhost \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.