From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: mvebu: rename ARM_ERRATA_753970
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:11:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415178691.20372.225.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140912133142.GJ12361@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 14:31 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 01:10:05PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > ARM_ERRATA_753970 was renamed to PL310_ERRATA_753970 in v3.2, through
> > commit fa0ce4035d48 ("ARM: 7162/1: errata: tidy up Kconfig options for
> > PL310 errata workarounds"). Two selects were added in v3.15 that still
> > use the previous name. Rename these. Make these select statements depend
> > on CACHE_L2X0, like all other select statements for PL310_ERRATA_753970
> > do, to be safe we don't inadvertently start to allow pointless
> > configurations in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> > ---
> > v3: add CACHE_L2X0 dependency, as Russell requested.
> >
> > Tested with "git grep" and fiddling with "make ARCH=arm [...]config".
> > Please shout if that's deemed insufficient.
> >
> > Note that I promised this v3 over two months ago. Taking two months to
> > update this patch is not really something to be proud of. On the other
> > hand: no one bothered to prod me for this v3 or send in a proper fix
> > themselves. Add to this that I first reported these selects for an
> > outdated Kconfig symbol in April. So I begin to wonder whether these
> > selects statements are really needed to begin with.
Whatever will be done in the long run: no one else said anything about
my v3. It's now nearly seven months since I first reported this issue.
In the mean time three releases contained the bogus selects. Apparently
neither Marvell Armada 375 boards nor Marvell Armada 380/385 boards
actually need to select PL310_ERRATA_753970.
I think I'll send a trivial cleanup shortly.
> I wonder whether we should deal with this a different way: rather than
> having this stuff as a configuration option, have the work-arounds
> default to being enabled, and have kernel command parameters to disable
> them should that be necessary.
>
> I expect the normal case is that everyone normally runs with these
> errata workarounds enabled (especially with a single zImage kernel), so
> there will be relatively few who need to disable them. Plus, this gives
> flexibility on single zImage to turn the errata workarounds off without
> needing to rebuild.
>
> The other major advantage is less Kconfig options with dependencies
> which seem all to easily to result in select abuse.
I have no idea what CACHE_L2X0, ie the L2x0 outer cache controller,
actually does nor what those PL310 errata are all about. So I can't
comment on the feasibility of your idea. Obviously, dropping Kconfig
symbols, and making configuration a bit easier would be one of the
benefits of that idea. But I wouldn't know whether it outweighs the
costs involved.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: mvebu: rename ARM_ERRATA_753970
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 10:11:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415178691.20372.225.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140912133142.GJ12361@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 14:31 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 01:10:05PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > ARM_ERRATA_753970 was renamed to PL310_ERRATA_753970 in v3.2, through
> > commit fa0ce4035d48 ("ARM: 7162/1: errata: tidy up Kconfig options for
> > PL310 errata workarounds"). Two selects were added in v3.15 that still
> > use the previous name. Rename these. Make these select statements depend
> > on CACHE_L2X0, like all other select statements for PL310_ERRATA_753970
> > do, to be safe we don't inadvertently start to allow pointless
> > configurations in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> > ---
> > v3: add CACHE_L2X0 dependency, as Russell requested.
> >
> > Tested with "git grep" and fiddling with "make ARCH=arm [...]config".
> > Please shout if that's deemed insufficient.
> >
> > Note that I promised this v3 over two months ago. Taking two months to
> > update this patch is not really something to be proud of. On the other
> > hand: no one bothered to prod me for this v3 or send in a proper fix
> > themselves. Add to this that I first reported these selects for an
> > outdated Kconfig symbol in April. So I begin to wonder whether these
> > selects statements are really needed to begin with.
Whatever will be done in the long run: no one else said anything about
my v3. It's now nearly seven months since I first reported this issue.
In the mean time three releases contained the bogus selects. Apparently
neither Marvell Armada 375 boards nor Marvell Armada 380/385 boards
actually need to select PL310_ERRATA_753970.
I think I'll send a trivial cleanup shortly.
> I wonder whether we should deal with this a different way: rather than
> having this stuff as a configuration option, have the work-arounds
> default to being enabled, and have kernel command parameters to disable
> them should that be necessary.
>
> I expect the normal case is that everyone normally runs with these
> errata workarounds enabled (especially with a single zImage kernel), so
> there will be relatively few who need to disable them. Plus, this gives
> flexibility on single zImage to turn the errata workarounds off without
> needing to rebuild.
>
> The other major advantage is less Kconfig options with dependencies
> which seem all to easily to result in select abuse.
I have no idea what CACHE_L2X0, ie the L2x0 outer cache controller,
actually does nor what those PL310 errata are all about. So I can't
comment on the feasibility of your idea. Obviously, dropping Kconfig
symbols, and making configuration a bit easier would be one of the
benefits of that idea. But I wouldn't know whether it outweighs the
costs involved.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-05 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-05 19:01 [GIT PULL 0/8] ARM: SoC: pending changes for 3.15 Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:02 ` [GIT PULL 1/8] ARM: SoC non-critical bug fixes " Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:03 ` [GIT PULL 2/8] ARM: SoC: cleanups " Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:04 ` [GIT PULL 3/8] ARM: SoC specific changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-06 9:37 ` Kconfig ARM_ERRATA_753970? Paul Bolle
2014-04-06 17:02 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-04-06 17:02 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2014-04-06 17:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-04-06 17:28 ` Paul Bolle
2014-05-26 9:01 ` [PATCH] ARM: mvebu: rename ARM_ERRATA_753970 Paul Bolle
2014-05-26 9:01 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-20 20:21 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-20 20:21 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-20 20:42 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-20 20:42 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-20 21:10 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-20 21:10 ` Jason Cooper
2014-06-23 7:58 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-23 7:58 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-20 20:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-20 20:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-23 9:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Bolle
2014-06-23 9:01 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-23 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-23 9:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-06-23 9:34 ` Paul Bolle
2014-06-23 9:34 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-12 11:10 ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Bolle
2014-09-12 11:10 ` Paul Bolle
2014-09-12 13:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-12 13:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-05 9:11 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-11-05 9:11 ` Paul Bolle
2014-04-05 19:04 ` [GIT PULL 4/8] ARM: SoC: board changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:05 ` [GIT PULL 5/8] ARM: SoC: device tree changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:06 ` [GIT PULL 6/8] ARM: SoC: driver changes Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:06 ` [GIT PULL 7/8] ARM: SoC: sh " Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:07 ` [GIT PULL 8/8] ARM: SoC: late cleanups Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-05 19:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415178691.20372.225.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.