From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: [Cocci] spatch for trivial pointer comparison style?
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:22:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415982122.5912.14.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1411140938400.2443@hadrien>
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 10:18 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > Yes, I agree with some of the things Al Viro said
> > there, but isn't 'type t; t *p;' a subset of
> > "expression *e"?
> No. How would you expect it to be different.
[]
> type t means that the type
> is known. expression *e means that there is a * in the type.
I had thought "expression *" could be r-value and
"type t; t *p;" could be l-value.
But then I don't find (or maybe don't parse too well)
the coccinelle documentation that specifies these
type relationships.
cheers, Joe
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: cocci <cocci@systeme.lip6.fr>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] spatch for trivial pointer comparison style?
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:22:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1415982122.5912.14.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1411140938400.2443@hadrien>
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 10:18 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > Yes, I agree with some of the things Al Viro said
> > there, but isn't 'type t; t *p;' a subset of
> > "expression *e"?
> No. How would you expect it to be different.
[]
> type t means that the type
> is known. expression *e means that there is a * in the type.
I had thought "expression *" could be r-value and
"type t; t *p;" could be l-value.
But then I don't find (or maybe don't parse too well)
the coccinelle documentation that specifies these
type relationships.
cheers, Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-14 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-13 19:55 [Cocci] spatch for trivial pointer comparison style? Joe Perches
2014-11-13 19:55 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-14 6:06 ` [Cocci] " Julia Lawall
2014-11-14 6:06 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-14 6:12 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-14 6:12 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-14 9:18 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-14 9:18 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-14 16:22 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2014-11-14 16:22 ` Joe Perches
2014-11-15 6:11 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-15 6:11 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-14 10:08 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-11-14 10:08 ` SF Markus Elfring
2014-11-14 10:31 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-14 10:31 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1415982122.5912.14.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.