From: pebolle@tiscali.nl (Paul Bolle)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: at91: move debug-macro.S into the common space
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:23:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421745792.9655.98.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421088136-10172-6-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Alexandre,
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 19:42 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Move debug-macro.S from include/mach/ to include/debug where all other common
> debug macros are.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
This patch became commit 5f58c97099f2 ("ARM: at91: move debug-macro.S
into the common space") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150120). I
noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem in
it.
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++++++--
> .../mach/debug-macro.S => include/debug/at91.S} | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> rename arch/arm/{mach-at91/include/mach/debug-macro.S => include/debug/at91.S} (68%)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 3589d67437f8..8c25979a3c43 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ F: arch/arm/boot/dts/at91*.dts
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/at91*.dtsi
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sama*.dts
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sama*.dtsi
> +F: arch/arm/include/debug/at91.S
>
> ARM/ATMEL AT91 Clock Support
> M: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> index 5ddd4906f7a7..e34d24949c6a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -115,15 +115,18 @@ choice
> 0x80024000 | 0xf0024000 | UART9
>
> config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU0
> - bool "Kernel low-level debugging on rm9200, 9260/9g20, 9261/9g10 and 9rl"
> + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on rm9200, 9260/9g20, 9261/9g10, 9rl, 9x5, 9n12"
> + select DEBUG_AT91_UART
There's no Kconfig symbol DEBUG_AT91_UART in linux-next. So this select
is currently a nop. Why was it added?
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU0
>
> config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU1
> - bool "Kernel low-level debugging on 9263 and 9g45"
> + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on 9263, 9g45 and sama5d3"
> + select DEBUG_AT91_UART
Ditto.
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU1
>
> config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2
> bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d4"
> + select DEBUG_AT91_UART
Ditto.
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU2
>
> config DEBUG_BCM2835
> @@ -1165,6 +1168,8 @@ config DEBUG_LL_INCLUDE
> string
> default "debug/sa1100.S" if DEBUG_SA1100
> default "debug/8250.S" if DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_8250
> + default "debug/at91.S" if AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU0 || AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU1 || \
> + AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2
> default "debug/asm9260.S" if DEBUG_ASM9260_UART
> default "debug/clps711x.S" if DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART1 || DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART2
> default "debug/meson.S" if DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: at91: move debug-macro.S into the common space
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 10:23:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1421745792.9655.98.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421088136-10172-6-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Alexandre,
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 19:42 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Move debug-macro.S from include/mach/ to include/debug where all other common
> debug macros are.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
This patch became commit 5f58c97099f2 ("ARM: at91: move debug-macro.S
into the common space") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150120). I
noticed because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem in
it.
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++++++--
> .../mach/debug-macro.S => include/debug/at91.S} | 19 +++++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> rename arch/arm/{mach-at91/include/mach/debug-macro.S => include/debug/at91.S} (68%)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 3589d67437f8..8c25979a3c43 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -877,6 +877,7 @@ F: arch/arm/boot/dts/at91*.dts
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/at91*.dtsi
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sama*.dts
> F: arch/arm/boot/dts/sama*.dtsi
> +F: arch/arm/include/debug/at91.S
>
> ARM/ATMEL AT91 Clock Support
> M: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> index 5ddd4906f7a7..e34d24949c6a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -115,15 +115,18 @@ choice
> 0x80024000 | 0xf0024000 | UART9
>
> config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU0
> - bool "Kernel low-level debugging on rm9200, 9260/9g20, 9261/9g10 and 9rl"
> + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on rm9200, 9260/9g20, 9261/9g10, 9rl, 9x5, 9n12"
> + select DEBUG_AT91_UART
There's no Kconfig symbol DEBUG_AT91_UART in linux-next. So this select
is currently a nop. Why was it added?
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU0
>
> config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU1
> - bool "Kernel low-level debugging on 9263 and 9g45"
> + bool "Kernel low-level debugging on 9263, 9g45 and sama5d3"
> + select DEBUG_AT91_UART
Ditto.
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU1
>
> config AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2
> bool "Kernel low-level debugging on sama5d4"
> + select DEBUG_AT91_UART
Ditto.
> depends on HAVE_AT91_DBGU2
>
> config DEBUG_BCM2835
> @@ -1165,6 +1168,8 @@ config DEBUG_LL_INCLUDE
> string
> default "debug/sa1100.S" if DEBUG_SA1100
> default "debug/8250.S" if DEBUG_LL_UART_8250 || DEBUG_UART_8250
> + default "debug/at91.S" if AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU0 || AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU1 || \
> + AT91_DEBUG_LL_DBGU2
> default "debug/asm9260.S" if DEBUG_ASM9260_UART
> default "debug/clps711x.S" if DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART1 || DEBUG_CLPS711X_UART2
> default "debug/meson.S" if DEBUG_MESON_UARTAO
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-12 18:42 [PATCH 0/7] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #1 Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` [PATCH 1/7] ARM: at91: remove unused mach/memory.h Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` [PATCH 2/7] ARM: at91: remove useless config MACH_AT91RM9200_DT Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] ARM: at91: remove useless config MACH_AT91SAM9_DT Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: at91: remove useless at91_sysirq_mask_rtx Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` [PATCH 5/7] ARM: at91: move debug-macro.S into the common space Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-20 9:23 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-01-20 9:23 ` Paul Bolle
2015-01-20 10:54 ` [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix Kconfig.debug by adding DEBUG_AT91_UART option Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-20 10:54 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-23 23:03 ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-23 23:03 ` Olof Johansson
2015-01-12 18:42 ` [PATCH 6/7] ARM: at91: remove useless at91rm9200_dt_initialize() Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-13 1:24 ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13 1:24 ` Bo Shen
2015-01-13 15:58 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-13 15:58 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-12 18:42 ` [PATCH 7/7] ARM: at91: remove useless at91rm9200_set_type() Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 18:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-12 19:26 ` [PATCH 0/7] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #1 Boris Brezillon
2015-01-12 19:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-15 14:09 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-15 14:09 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1421745792.9655.98.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.