From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: pmu: add support for interrupt-affinity property
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:54:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422294858-28100-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422294858-28100-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
Historically, the PMU devicetree bindings have expected SPIs to be
listed in order of *logical* CPU number. This is problematic for
bootloaders, especially when the boot CPU (logical ID 0) isn't listed
first in the devicetree.
This patch adds a new optional property, interrupt-affinity, to the
PMU node which allows the interrupt affinity to be described using
a list of phandled to CPU nodes, with each entry in the list
corresponding to the SPI at the same index in the interrupts property.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 1 +
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
index b1596bd59129..675e4ab79f68 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
struct arm_pmu {
struct pmu pmu;
cpumask_t active_irqs;
+ int *irq_affinity;
char *name;
irqreturn_t (*handle_irq)(int irq_num, void *dev);
void (*enable)(struct perf_event *event);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
index dd9acc95ebc0..488bda0646ec 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
@@ -92,11 +92,16 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
} else {
for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
- if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(i, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
+ int cpu = i;
+
+ if (cpu_pmu->irq_affinity)
+ cpu = cpu_pmu->irq_affinity[i];
+
+ if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
continue;
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
if (irq >= 0)
- free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, i));
+ free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
}
}
}
@@ -128,32 +133,37 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, irq_handler_t handler)
on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu_enable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
} else {
for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
+ int cpu = i;
+
err = 0;
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
if (irq < 0)
continue;
+ if (cpu_pmu->irq_affinity)
+ cpu = cpu_pmu->irq_affinity[i];
+
/*
* If we have a single PMU interrupt that we can't shift,
* assume that we're running on a uniprocessor machine and
* continue. Otherwise, continue without this interrupt.
*/
- if (irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(i)) && irqs > 1) {
+ if (irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu)) && irqs > 1) {
pr_warn("unable to set irq affinity (irq=%d, cpu=%u)\n",
- irq, i);
+ irq, cpu);
continue;
}
err = request_irq(irq, handler,
IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD, "arm-pmu",
- per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, i));
+ per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
if (err) {
pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
irq);
return err;
}
- cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs);
}
}
@@ -289,6 +299,48 @@ static int probe_current_pmu(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
return ret;
}
+static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int i;
+ int *irqs = kcalloc(pdev->num_resources, sizeof(*irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!irqs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pdev->num_resources; ++i) {
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ int cpu = -1;
+
+ dn = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupt-affinity",
+ i);
+ if (!dn) {
+ pr_warn("Failed to parse interrupt-affinity for idx %d\n",
+ i);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ if (arch_find_n_match_cpu_physical_id(dn, cpu, NULL))
+ break;
+
+ if (cpu == -1) {
+ pr_warn("Failed to find logical CPU for %s\n",
+ dn->name);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ irqs[i] = cpu;
+ of_node_put(dn);
+ }
+
+ if (i == pdev->num_resources)
+ cpu_pmu->irq_affinity = irqs;
+ else
+ kfree(irqs);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int cpu_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
const struct of_device_id *of_id;
@@ -313,7 +365,10 @@ static int cpu_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (node && (of_id = of_match_node(cpu_pmu_of_device_ids, pdev->dev.of_node))) {
init_fn = of_id->data;
- ret = init_fn(pmu);
+
+ ret = of_pmu_irq_cfg(pdev);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = init_fn(pmu);
} else {
ret = probe_current_pmu(pmu);
}
--
2.1.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: pmu: add support for interrupt-affinity property
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:54:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422294858-28100-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422294858-28100-1-git-send-email-will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Historically, the PMU devicetree bindings have expected SPIs to be
listed in order of *logical* CPU number. This is problematic for
bootloaders, especially when the boot CPU (logical ID 0) isn't listed
first in the devicetree.
This patch adds a new optional property, interrupt-affinity, to the
PMU node which allows the interrupt affinity to be described using
a list of phandled to CPU nodes, with each entry in the list
corresponding to the SPI at the same index in the interrupts property.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h | 1 +
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
index b1596bd59129..675e4ab79f68 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pmu.h
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct pmu_hw_events {
struct arm_pmu {
struct pmu pmu;
cpumask_t active_irqs;
+ int *irq_affinity;
char *name;
irqreturn_t (*handle_irq)(int irq_num, void *dev);
void (*enable)(struct perf_event *event);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
index dd9acc95ebc0..488bda0646ec 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
@@ -92,11 +92,16 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
} else {
for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
- if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(i, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
+ int cpu = i;
+
+ if (cpu_pmu->irq_affinity)
+ cpu = cpu_pmu->irq_affinity[i];
+
+ if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
continue;
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
if (irq >= 0)
- free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, i));
+ free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
}
}
}
@@ -128,32 +133,37 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, irq_handler_t handler)
on_each_cpu(cpu_pmu_enable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
} else {
for (i = 0; i < irqs; ++i) {
+ int cpu = i;
+
err = 0;
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
if (irq < 0)
continue;
+ if (cpu_pmu->irq_affinity)
+ cpu = cpu_pmu->irq_affinity[i];
+
/*
* If we have a single PMU interrupt that we can't shift,
* assume that we're running on a uniprocessor machine and
* continue. Otherwise, continue without this interrupt.
*/
- if (irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(i)) && irqs > 1) {
+ if (irq_set_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu)) && irqs > 1) {
pr_warn("unable to set irq affinity (irq=%d, cpu=%u)\n",
- irq, i);
+ irq, cpu);
continue;
}
err = request_irq(irq, handler,
IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD, "arm-pmu",
- per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, i));
+ per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
if (err) {
pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
irq);
return err;
}
- cpumask_set_cpu(i, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs);
}
}
@@ -289,6 +299,48 @@ static int probe_current_pmu(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
return ret;
}
+static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int i;
+ int *irqs = kcalloc(pdev->num_resources, sizeof(*irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ if (!irqs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < pdev->num_resources; ++i) {
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ int cpu = -1;
+
+ dn = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupt-affinity",
+ i);
+ if (!dn) {
+ pr_warn("Failed to parse interrupt-affinity for idx %d\n",
+ i);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ if (arch_find_n_match_cpu_physical_id(dn, cpu, NULL))
+ break;
+
+ if (cpu == -1) {
+ pr_warn("Failed to find logical CPU for %s\n",
+ dn->name);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ irqs[i] = cpu;
+ of_node_put(dn);
+ }
+
+ if (i == pdev->num_resources)
+ cpu_pmu->irq_affinity = irqs;
+ else
+ kfree(irqs);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int cpu_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
const struct of_device_id *of_id;
@@ -313,7 +365,10 @@ static int cpu_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (node && (of_id = of_match_node(cpu_pmu_of_device_ids, pdev->dev.of_node))) {
init_fn = of_id->data;
- ret = init_fn(pmu);
+
+ ret = of_pmu_irq_cfg(pdev);
+ if (!ret)
+ ret = init_fn(pmu);
} else {
ret = probe_current_pmu(pmu);
}
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-26 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-26 17:54 [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: fix PMU IRQ ordering for Juno Will Deacon
2015-01-26 17:54 ` Will Deacon
2015-01-26 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: pmu: add support for interrupt-affinity property Will Deacon
2015-01-26 17:54 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 11:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:56 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 12:12 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 12:12 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 12:23 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 12:23 ` Mark Rutland
2015-01-26 17:54 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-01-26 17:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: " Will Deacon
2015-01-26 17:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: add interrupt-affinity property to pmu node for juno Will Deacon
2015-01-26 17:54 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: fix PMU IRQ ordering for Juno Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:46 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:54 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 11:54 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 11:59 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 11:59 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 12:09 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 12:09 ` Will Deacon
2015-02-05 12:20 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 12:20 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 12:48 ` David Gibson
2015-02-05 12:48 ` David Gibson
2015-02-05 14:33 ` Jon Loeliger
2015-02-05 14:33 ` Jon Loeliger
2015-02-05 15:38 ` Mark Rutland
2015-02-05 15:38 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1422294858-28100-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.