All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Chen Gang S <gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn>
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, gustavo@padovan.org,
	johan.hedberg@gmail.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Use 'const void *' instead of 'void *' for 2nd parameter of hci_test_bit()
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:20:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422912017.30476.28.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CFE8BE.5030700@sunrus.com.cn>

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 05:14 +0800, Chen Gang S wrote:
> hci_test_bit() does not modify 2nd parameter, so it is better to let it
> be constant, or may cause build warning. The related warning (with
> allmodconfig under xtensa):
[]
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
[]
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct hci_pinfo {
>  	unsigned short    channel;
>  };
>  
> -static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, void *addr)
> +static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, const void *addr)
>  {
>  	return *((__u32 *) addr + (nr >> 5)) & ((__u32) 1 << (nr & 31));
>  }

It's probably better to use const __u32 * here too, but the
real thing I wonder is whether or not there's an issue with
one of the 2 uses of this function.

One of them passes a unsigned long *, the other a u32 *.

$ git grep -w hci_test_bit
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c:static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, void *addr)
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c:       if (!hci_test_bit(flt_event, &flt->event_mask))
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c:                    !hci_test_bit(ocf & HCI_FLT_OCF_BITS,
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c-                                  &hci_sec_filter.ocf_mask[ogf])) &&

hci_sec_filter.ocf_mask is __u32
but flt->event_mask is unsigned long.

Any possible issue here on 64-bit systems?

---

$ git grep -A4 "struct hci_filter {"
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h:struct hci_filter {
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-       unsigned long type_mask;
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-       unsigned long event_mask[2];
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-       __le16 opcode;
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-};

---

static bool is_filtered_packet(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	struct hci_filter *flt;
[...]
	if (!hci_test_bit(flt_event, &flt->event_mask))
		return true;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Chen Gang S <gang.chen-/B7AUNIrSHOPt1CcHtbs0g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	gustavo-THi1TnShQwVAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	johan.hedberg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-bluetooth-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	"netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Use 'const void *' instead of 'void *' for 2nd parameter of hci_test_bit()
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:20:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1422912017.30476.28.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CFE8BE.5030700-/B7AUNIrSHOPt1CcHtbs0g@public.gmane.org>

On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 05:14 +0800, Chen Gang S wrote:
> hci_test_bit() does not modify 2nd parameter, so it is better to let it
> be constant, or may cause build warning. The related warning (with
> allmodconfig under xtensa):
[]
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c
[]
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ struct hci_pinfo {
>  	unsigned short    channel;
>  };
>  
> -static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, void *addr)
> +static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, const void *addr)
>  {
>  	return *((__u32 *) addr + (nr >> 5)) & ((__u32) 1 << (nr & 31));
>  }

It's probably better to use const __u32 * here too, but the
real thing I wonder is whether or not there's an issue with
one of the 2 uses of this function.

One of them passes a unsigned long *, the other a u32 *.

$ git grep -w hci_test_bit
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c:static inline int hci_test_bit(int nr, void *addr)
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c:       if (!hci_test_bit(flt_event, &flt->event_mask))
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c:                    !hci_test_bit(ocf & HCI_FLT_OCF_BITS,
net/bluetooth/hci_sock.c-                                  &hci_sec_filter.ocf_mask[ogf])) &&

hci_sec_filter.ocf_mask is __u32
but flt->event_mask is unsigned long.

Any possible issue here on 64-bit systems?

---

$ git grep -A4 "struct hci_filter {"
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h:struct hci_filter {
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-       unsigned long type_mask;
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-       unsigned long event_mask[2];
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-       __le16 opcode;
include/net/bluetooth/hci_sock.h-};

---

static bool is_filtered_packet(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	struct hci_filter *flt;
[...]
	if (!hci_test_bit(flt_event, &flt->event_mask))
		return true;

  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-02 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-02 21:14 [PATCH v2] net: bluetooth: hci_sock: Use 'const void *' instead of 'void *' for 2nd parameter of hci_test_bit() Chen Gang S
2015-02-02 21:14 ` Chen Gang S
2015-02-02 21:20 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2015-02-02 21:20   ` Joe Perches
2015-02-03  2:32   ` Chen Gang S
2015-02-03  2:32     ` Chen Gang S
2015-02-03  2:59     ` Chen Gang S
2015-02-04 12:13       ` David Laight
2015-02-04 12:13         ` David Laight
2015-02-04 12:13         ` David Laight
2015-02-04 11:59 ` David Laight
2015-02-04 11:59   ` David Laight
2015-02-04 11:59   ` David Laight
2015-02-04 20:13   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-02-04 21:09     ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-02-04 21:09       ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-02-04 21:47       ` Chen Gang S
2015-02-05 10:14         ` David Laight
2015-02-05 10:14           ` David Laight
2015-02-05 12:20           ` Chen Gang S

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1422912017.30476.28.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gang.chen@sunrus.com.cn \
    --cc=gustavo@padovan.org \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.