* ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS
@ 2015-05-08 14:52 Dario Faggioli
2015-05-08 15:00 ` Robert VanVossen
2015-05-08 15:06 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-08 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert VanVossen
Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Studer, Nathan C
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 619 bytes --]
Hey guys,
I just noticed that the ARINC653 scheduler record in MAINTAINERS reads
as follows:
ARINC653 SCHEDULER
M: Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>
M: Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
S: Supported
F: xen/common/sched_arinc653.c
F: tools/libxc/xc_arinc653.c
Is that still accurate? I'm especially referring to Nate's commitment
and e-mail address.
If yes, sorry for the noise. If no, you should send a patch to update
it.
No pressure, of course, it's just that I run over it and thought it was
worth double checking! :-)
Regards,
Dario
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS
2015-05-08 14:52 ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS Dario Faggioli
@ 2015-05-08 15:00 ` Robert VanVossen
2015-05-08 15:06 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert VanVossen @ 2015-05-08 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dario Faggioli
Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Studer, Nathan C
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]
Thanks Dario. We actually just sent out a patch this week to have josh whitehead replace nate studer as a maintainer for the arinc653 scheduler.
Thanks,
Robbie VanVossen
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Date: 05/08/2015 10:51 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Robert VanVossen <Robert.VanVossen@dornerworks.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, "Studer, Nathan C" <nathan.c.studer@delphi.com>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS
Hey guys,
I just noticed that the ARINC653 scheduler record in MAINTAINERS reads
as follows:
ARINC653 SCHEDULER
M: Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>
M: Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
S: Supported
F: xen/common/sched_arinc653.c
F: tools/libxc/xc_arinc653.c
Is that still accurate? I'm especially referring to Nate's commitment
and e-mail address.
If yes, sorry for the noise. If no, you should send a patch to update
it.
No pressure, of course, it's just that I run over it and thought it was
worth double checking! :-)
Regards,
Dario
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2152 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS
2015-05-08 14:52 ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS Dario Faggioli
2015-05-08 15:00 ` Robert VanVossen
@ 2015-05-08 15:06 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-05-08 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dario Faggioli
Cc: George Dunlap, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Robert VanVossen,
Nathan C Studer
>>> On 08.05.15 at 16:52, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I just noticed that the ARINC653 scheduler record in MAINTAINERS reads
> as follows:
>
> ARINC653 SCHEDULER
> M: Nathan Studer <nate.studer@dornerworks.com>
> M: Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com>
> S: Supported
> F: xen/common/sched_arinc653.c
> F: tools/libxc/xc_arinc653.c
>
> Is that still accurate? I'm especially referring to Nate's commitment
> and e-mail address.
>
> If yes, sorry for the noise. If no, you should send a patch to update
> it.
>
> No pressure, of course, it's just that I run over it and thought it was
> worth double checking! :-)
And double checking would have lead you to commit
06615b0de04eca56645be05600a54623bd34e21c (or
the respective mail on the list).
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-08 15:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-08 14:52 ARINC scheduler entry in MAINTAINERS Dario Faggioli
2015-05-08 15:00 ` Robert VanVossen
2015-05-08 15:06 ` Jan Beulich
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.