* [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS
@ 2015-05-22 9:55 Dario Faggioli
2015-05-22 10:02 ` Ian Campbell
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-22 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2926 bytes --]
the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go
away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to
stay.
It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the
former in favour of the latter. Note that the
-sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to
debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not
necessary to have anything like that for RTDS.
For now, as RTDS is still marked as experimental,
test failures are allowed, as it was for SEDF.
[1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02874.html
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
---
allow.all | 2 +-
make-flight | 31 +++++++++----------------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/allow.all b/allow.all
index 6715b2e..2897b2e 100644
--- a/allow.all
+++ b/allow.all
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-test-@@-sedf@@
+test-@@-rtds@@
build-@@ logs-capture@@
test-@@-pcipt@@
test-@@-qemuu-@@ guest-localmigrate
diff --git a/make-flight b/make-flight
index 8a1fceb..837f372 100755
--- a/make-flight
+++ b/make-flight
@@ -262,30 +262,16 @@ do_hvm_rhel6_tests () {
done
}
-do_sedf_tests () {
+do_nondef_sched_tests () {
if [ $xenarch != $dom0arch ]; then
return
fi
- for pin in '' -pin; do
- job_create_test test-$xenarch$kern-$dom0arch-xl-sedf$pin \
- test-debian xl $xenarch $dom0arch \
- guests_vcpus=4 \
- xen_boot_append="sched=sedf loglvl=all ${pin:+dom0_vcpus_pin}" \
- linux_boot_append='loglevel=9 debug' \
- $debian_runvars all_hostflags=$most_hostflags
- done
-}
-
-do_credit2_tests () {
- if [ $xenarch != $dom0arch ]; then
- return
- fi
-
- job_create_test test-$xenarch$kern-$dom0arch-xl-credit2 \
- test-debian xl $xenarch $dom0arch \
- guests_vcpus=4 xen_boot_append='sched=credit2' \
- $debian_runvars all_hostflags=$most_hostflags
+ sched=$1
+ job_create_test test-$xenarch$kern-$dom0arch-xl-$sched \
+ test-debian xl $xenarch $dom0arch \
+ guests_vcpus=4 xen_boot_append="sched=$sched" \
+ $debian_runvars all_hostflags=$most_hostflags
}
do_multivcpu_tests () {
@@ -350,8 +336,9 @@ test_matrix_do_one () {
do_pv_debian_tests
do_multivcpu_tests
- do_sedf_tests
- do_credit2_tests
+ for s in credit2 rtds; do
+ do_nondef_sched_tests $s
+ done
# No further arm tests at the moment
if [ $dom0arch = armhf ]; then
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-22 9:55 [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-22 10:02 ` Ian Campbell 2015-05-22 10:13 ` Dario Faggioli 2015-05-22 10:19 ` Dario Faggioli ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-05-22 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dario Faggioli; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > stay. > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. Does the RTDS scheduler work out of the box? I had a feeling that it required per domain config settings to be worked out? > > For now, as RTDS is still marked as experimental, > test failures are allowed, as it was for SEDF. > > [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02874.html > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> > --- > allow.all | 2 +- > make-flight | 31 +++++++++---------------------- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/allow.all b/allow.all > index 6715b2e..2897b2e 100644 > --- a/allow.all > +++ b/allow.all > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -test-@@-sedf@@ > +test-@@-rtds@@ > build-@@ logs-capture@@ > test-@@-pcipt@@ > test-@@-qemuu-@@ guest-localmigrate > diff --git a/make-flight b/make-flight > index 8a1fceb..837f372 100755 > --- a/make-flight > +++ b/make-flight > @@ -262,30 +262,16 @@ do_hvm_rhel6_tests () { > done > } > > -do_sedf_tests () { > +do_nondef_sched_tests () { > if [ $xenarch != $dom0arch ]; then > return > fi > > - for pin in '' -pin; do > - job_create_test test-$xenarch$kern-$dom0arch-xl-sedf$pin \ > - test-debian xl $xenarch $dom0arch \ > - guests_vcpus=4 \ > - xen_boot_append="sched=sedf loglvl=all ${pin:+dom0_vcpus_pin}" \ > - linux_boot_append='loglevel=9 debug' \ > - $debian_runvars all_hostflags=$most_hostflags > - done > -} > - > -do_credit2_tests () { > - if [ $xenarch != $dom0arch ]; then > - return > - fi > - > - job_create_test test-$xenarch$kern-$dom0arch-xl-credit2 \ > - test-debian xl $xenarch $dom0arch \ > - guests_vcpus=4 xen_boot_append='sched=credit2' \ > - $debian_runvars all_hostflags=$most_hostflags > + sched=$1 > + job_create_test test-$xenarch$kern-$dom0arch-xl-$sched \ > + test-debian xl $xenarch $dom0arch \ > + guests_vcpus=4 xen_boot_append="sched=$sched" \ > + $debian_runvars all_hostflags=$most_hostflags > } > > do_multivcpu_tests () { > @@ -350,8 +336,9 @@ test_matrix_do_one () { > do_pv_debian_tests > > do_multivcpu_tests > - do_sedf_tests > - do_credit2_tests > + for s in credit2 rtds; do > + do_nondef_sched_tests $s > + done > > # No further arm tests at the moment > if [ $dom0arch = armhf ]; then > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-22 10:02 ` Ian Campbell @ 2015-05-22 10:13 ` Dario Faggioli 2015-05-22 10:17 ` Ian Campbell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-22 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 981 bytes --] On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:02 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > > stay. > > > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. > > Does the RTDS scheduler work out of the box? I had a feeling that it > required per domain config settings to be worked out? > It does, your feeling is about ARINC653 :-) Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-22 10:13 ` Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-22 10:17 ` Ian Campbell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-05-22 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dario Faggioli; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 12:13 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:02 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > > > stay. > > > > > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > > > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > > > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > > > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > > > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. > > > > Does the RTDS scheduler work out of the box? I had a feeling that it > > required per domain config settings to be worked out? > > > It does, your feeling is about ARINC653 :-) Great, thanks! Ian. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-22 9:55 [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS Dario Faggioli 2015-05-22 10:02 ` Ian Campbell @ 2015-05-22 10:19 ` Dario Faggioli 2015-05-23 4:29 ` Meng Xu 2015-06-08 10:32 ` Ian Campbell 2015-06-10 9:58 ` Ian Jackson 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-22 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Ian Campbell, Meng Xu, Ian Jackson, Xi Sisu [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13608 bytes --] [ Adding to Cc the people that I though I added when sending the patch, but that apparently I haven't...sorry :-( ] On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > stay. > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. > > For now, as RTDS is still marked as experimental, > test failures are allowed, as it was for SEDF. > > [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02874.html > Oh, and here's the diff of the generated runvars that IanJ usually asks about: :-) dariof@drall:~/osstest.git$ diff -Nru runvar.prepatch runvar.patched --- runvar.prepatch 2015-05-21 17:13:51.328281000 +0100 +++ runvar.patched 2015-05-21 17:15:51.112202000 +0100 @@ -370,30 +370,17 @@ test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 win_acpi_shutdown true test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 win_image winxpsp3.iso test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 xenbuildjob build-amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf all_hostflags arch-amd64,arch-xen-amd64,suite-wheezy,purpose-test -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf arch amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf buildjob build-amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf debian_arch amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf debian_kernkind pvops -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf guests_vcpus 4 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf kernbuildjob build-amd64-pvops -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf kernkind pvops -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf linux_boot_append loglevel=9 debug -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin all_hostflags arch-amd64,arch-xen-amd64,suite-wheezy,purpose-test -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin arch amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin buildjob build-amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin debian_arch amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin debian_kernkind pvops -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin guests_vcpus 4 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin kernbuildjob build-amd64-pvops -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin kernkind pvops -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin linux_boot_append loglevel=9 debug -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin toolstack xl -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin xen_boot_append sched=sedf loglvl=all dom0_vcpus_pin -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin xenbuildjob build-amd64 -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf toolstack xl -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf xen_boot_append sched=sedf loglvl=all -test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf xenbuildjob build-amd64 +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds all_hostflags arch-amd64,arch-xen-amd64,suite-wheezy,purpose-test +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds arch amd64 +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds buildjob build-amd64 +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds debian_arch amd64 +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds debian_kernkind pvops +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds guests_vcpus 4 +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds kernbuildjob build-amd64-pvops +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds kernkind pvops +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds toolstack xl +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds xen_boot_append sched=rtds +test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds xenbuildjob build-amd64 test-amd64-amd64-xl toolstack xl test-amd64-amd64-xl xenbuildjob build-amd64 test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm all_hostflags arch-amd64,arch-xen-amd64,suite-wheezy,purpose-test @@ -691,30 +678,17 @@ test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu kernkind pvops test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu toolstack xl test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu xenbuildjob build-armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf all_hostflags arch-armhf,arch-xen-armhf,suite-wheezy,purpose-test -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf arch armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf buildjob build-armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf debian_arch armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf debian_kernkind pvops -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf guests_vcpus 4 -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf kernbuildjob build-armhf-pvops -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf kernkind pvops -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf linux_boot_append loglevel=9 debug -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin all_hostflags arch-armhf,arch-xen-armhf,suite-wheezy,purpose-test -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin arch armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin buildjob build-armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin debian_arch armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin debian_kernkind pvops -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin guests_vcpus 4 -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin kernbuildjob build-armhf-pvops -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin kernkind pvops -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin linux_boot_append loglevel=9 debug -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin toolstack xl -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin xen_boot_append sched=sedf loglvl=all dom0_vcpus_pin -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf-pin xenbuildjob build-armhf -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf toolstack xl -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf xen_boot_append sched=sedf loglvl=all -test-armhf-armhf-xl-sedf xenbuildjob build-armhf +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds all_hostflags arch-armhf,arch-xen-armhf,suite-wheezy,purpose-test +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds arch armhf +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds buildjob build-armhf +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds debian_arch armhf +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds debian_kernkind pvops +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds guests_vcpus 4 +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds kernbuildjob build-armhf-pvops +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds kernkind pvops +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds toolstack xl +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds xen_boot_append sched=rtds +test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds xenbuildjob build-armhf test-armhf-armhf-xl toolstack xl test-armhf-armhf-xl xenbuildjob build-armhf test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm all_hostflags arch-armhf,arch-xen-armhf,suite-wheezy,purpose-test -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-22 10:19 ` Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-23 4:29 ` Meng Xu 2015-05-27 16:45 ` Dario Faggioli 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Meng Xu @ 2015-05-23 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dario Faggioli Cc: Ian Campbell, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ian Jackson, Xi Sisu Hi Dario, 2015-05-22 3:19 GMT-07:00 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>: > > [ Adding to Cc the people that I though I added when sending the patch, > but that apparently I haven't...sorry :-( ] Thanks for cc.ing us. :-) > > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > > stay. > > > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. > > > > For now, as RTDS is still marked as experimental, > > test failures are allowed, as it was for SEDF. > > > > [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02874.html > > > Oh, and here's the diff of the generated runvars that IanJ usually asks > about: :-) I'm not so familiar with osstest. (Maybe I should have a look at it so that we can know how to use it for some auto tests.) I just have a quick (probably dummy) question: Do we have any document that describes the coverage of the test? The reason I asked this is: 1) The document could make it easier for users to know which functionalities of the feature (i.e., RTDS scheduler here) have been tested. 2) I didn't see the toolstack functionality of RTDS scheduler is called in the test. So I'm wondering about the first question. :-) (probably I missed something?) Thanks, Meng ----------- Meng Xu PhD Student in Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mengxu/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-23 4:29 ` Meng Xu @ 2015-05-27 16:45 ` Dario Faggioli 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-05-27 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Meng Xu; +Cc: Ian Campbell, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ian Jackson, Xi Sisu [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2805 bytes --] On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 21:29 -0700, Meng Xu wrote: > Hi Dario, > Hi, > 2015-05-22 3:19 GMT-07:00 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>: > > > > On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > > > stay. > > > > I'm not so familiar with osstest. (Maybe I should have a look at it so > that we can know how to use it for some auto tests.) > I just have a quick (probably dummy) question: > Do we have any document that describes the coverage of the test? > If, by document, you mean the documentation one would need to used OSSTest, do development on it, and maybe setup and run an instance of, there is some docs --certainly much more than even a few weeks before now: README files in the sources} https://blog.xenproject.org/2013/02/02/xen-automatic-test-system-osstest/ http://www.xenproject.org/component/allvideoshare/video/xpds13-osstest.html https://blog.xenproject.org/2013/09/30/osstest-standalone-mode-step-by-step/ Setting up your own instance would be rather tricky, though, at least untile you get used enough to it. > The reason I asked this > is: > 1) The document could make it easier for users to know which > functionalities of the feature (i.e., RTDS scheduler here) have been > tested. > I don't think that's how OSSTest works or how it should be used. OSSTest is meant for us developers, in order to be sure that we do not cause regressions. That's why it gates commits. Users, if we say (e.g., in some release notes), that a feature is 'ready'/\supported\/whatever should be able to use it fully, and complain if it doesn't work, regardless of what tests us developers or OSSTest have run! > 2) I didn't see the toolstack functionality of RTDS scheduler is > called in the test. So I'm wondering about the first question. :-) > (probably I missed something?) > The test does what it's being done already for other schedulers: sets RTDS as the default scheduler, boots Xen with it, then it creates a domain, and it starts and stop it a few times. If you want to have a look, check make-flight, sg-run-job, ts-guest-start and ts-guest-stop in OSSTest's codebase. We do not do any testing of changing scheduling parameters of a guest, if that was what you were referring to, for any of the schedulers. We of course can introduce that (and do it for everyone), but that would be another patch series. Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-22 9:55 [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS Dario Faggioli 2015-05-22 10:02 ` Ian Campbell 2015-05-22 10:19 ` Dario Faggioli @ 2015-06-08 10:32 ` Ian Campbell 2015-06-10 9:58 ` Ian Jackson 3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-06-08 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dario Faggioli; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 11:55 +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote: > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > stay. > > It therefore makes sense to stop smoke testing the > former in favour of the latter. Note that the > -sedf-pin jobs where only added in order to try to > debug a long standing issue with SEDF; it is not > necessary to have anything like that for RTDS. > > For now, as RTDS is still marked as experimental, > test failures are allowed, as it was for SEDF. > > [1] http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-05/msg02874.html > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-05-22 9:55 [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS Dario Faggioli ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2015-06-08 10:32 ` Ian Campbell @ 2015-06-10 9:58 ` Ian Jackson 2015-06-10 11:20 ` Dario Faggioli 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Ian Jackson @ 2015-06-10 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dario Faggioli; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS"): > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > stay. The RTDS scheduler was introduced in 4.4, AFAICT. osstest needs to test older versions of Xen too. So I think you need to gate this on the xen version. Ian. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS 2015-06-10 9:58 ` Ian Jackson @ 2015-06-10 11:20 ` Dario Faggioli 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Dario Faggioli @ 2015-06-10 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ian Jackson; +Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 771 bytes --] On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 10:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Dario Faggioli writes ("[PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS"): > > the SEDF scheduler is about to be deprecated and go > > away (see [1]). OTOH, the RTDS scheduler is here to > > stay. > > The RTDS scheduler was introduced in 4.4, AFAICT. > > osstest needs to test older versions of Xen too. So I think you need > to gate this on the xen version. > Good point, and sorry for missing this! I will respin ASAP. Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) [-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-10 11:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-05-22 9:55 [PATCH] Osstest: stop testing SEDF, start testing RTDS Dario Faggioli 2015-05-22 10:02 ` Ian Campbell 2015-05-22 10:13 ` Dario Faggioli 2015-05-22 10:17 ` Ian Campbell 2015-05-22 10:19 ` Dario Faggioli 2015-05-23 4:29 ` Meng Xu 2015-05-27 16:45 ` Dario Faggioli 2015-06-08 10:32 ` Ian Campbell 2015-06-10 9:58 ` Ian Jackson 2015-06-10 11:20 ` Dario Faggioli
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.