* Re: [osstest test] 58828: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
2015-06-23 9:16 ` [osstest test] 58828: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass Ian Campbell
@ 2015-06-23 10:04 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-06-23 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ian.jackson; +Cc: Wei Liu, xen-devel
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 10:16 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 02:18 +0000, osstest service user wrote:
> > flight 58828 osstest real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/58828/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > build-armhf 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 58726
> > build-armhf-xsm 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 58726
> > build-armhf-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 58726
>
> Copy kernel /home/tftp//osstest/debian-installer/armhf/2015-01-10-wheezy/backports.deb failed: No such file or directory at Osstest/Debian.pm line 884.
>
> Looks like I probably botched something in one of:
> 5dd4c52291b6 mg-debian-installer-update: updates to better handle Jessie onwards.
> cdbe966bb86e More flexible handling of need-kernel-deb-$flavour host flag
>
> I'll investigate.
So, the way I appear to have structured the backwards compatibility it
retains compatibility with the existing host props, but not with the
existing TftpDiVersion.
IOW mg-debian-installer-update-all should have been run while committing
"More flexible handling of need-kernel-deb-$flavour host flag", which I
seem to have forgotten to note anywhere -- although Ian J did do so in
response to v2.
I don't think handling compatibility with the layout of the existing
TftpDiVersion dir is going to be easy or worth it.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread