* Re: [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL
[not found] <osstest-60149-mainreport@xen.org>
@ 2015-07-31 6:40 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-07-31 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner, Wei Liu; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 05:01 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 60149 osstest real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60149/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-i386-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 60083
> build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 60083
> build-armhf-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 60083
Pretest contains the libvirt testing from Wei (ccd)
One of the libvirt self tests failed:
TEST: virshtest
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 40
!!!!!!!!!!!! 52 FAIL
FAIL: virshtest
[...]
=======================================
1 of 114 tests failed
(1 test was not run)
Please report to libvir-list@redhat.com
=======================================
Which isn't a lot to go on, aside frmo fixing this issue do we need to
gather more logs?
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 9 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z execution took 71 seconds[<=2x600]: timeout 630 ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o BatchMode=yes -o ConnectTimeout=100 -o ServerAliveInterval=100 -o PasswordAuthentication=no -o ChallengeResponseAuthentication=no -o UserKnownHostsFile=tmp/t.known_hosts_60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd root@172.16.144.35 mkdir -p /root/60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.redhat-newiso
genisoimage -R -J -T -b isolinux/isolinux.bin -c isolinux/boot.cat -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table -o /root/60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.rhel-server-6.1-i386-dvd.iso /root/60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.redhat-newiso/.
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at Osstest/TestSupport.pm line 1736.
2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z runvar store: redhat_cfgpath=/etc/xen/redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z executing scp ... /home/logs/logs/60149/test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd/pinot1--redhat.guest.osstest.cfg root@172.16.144.35:/etc/xen/redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 (echo xenvnc; echo xenvnc) | vncpasswd redhat.vncpw
2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 readlink /dev/pinot1/redhat.guest.osstest-disk
2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 lvdisplay --colon /dev/pinot1/redhat.guest.osstest-disk
Can't call method "create" on unblessed reference at Osstest/TestSupport.pm line 1436.
Presumably relating to some refactoring done?
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 9 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 9 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 9 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 60083
>
> Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 11 guest-start fail like 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail like 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 12 guest-saverestore fail like 60083
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 guest-saverestore fail like 60083
>
> Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-vhd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qcow2 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-qcow2 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 11 guest-start fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-raw 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 13 saverestore-support-check fail never pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 12 migrate-support-check fail never pass
>
> version targeted for testing:
> osstest 81cbee6666d45f382b14ac305180c3fe23895e92
> baseline version:
> osstest aad948fb77a04b4654d99cbe7762961261099054
>
> Last test of basis 60083 2015-07-28 15:38:48 Z 2 days
> Testing same since 60149 2015-07-30 18:38:52 Z 0 days 1 attempts
>
> jobs:
> build-amd64-xsm pass
> build-armhf-xsm pass
> build-i386-xsm pass
> build-amd64 pass
> build-armhf pass
> build-i386 pass
> build-amd64-libvirt fail
> build-armhf-libvirt fail
> build-i386-libvirt fail
> build-amd64-pvops pass
> build-armhf-pvops pass
> build-i386-pvops pass
> build-amd64-rumpuserxen pass
> build-i386-rumpuserxen pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm blocked
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm fail
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm blocked
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm blocked
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm blocked
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd fail
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd fail
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck pass
> test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 pass
> test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel fail
> test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel fail
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt blocked
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt blocked
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt blocked
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-multivcpu pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu pass
> test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
> test-amd64-i386-pair pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair blocked
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair blocked
> test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub fail
> test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub pass
> test-amd64-amd64-pygrub pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-qcow2 blocked
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 blocked
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2 blocked
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow2 pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-qcow2 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qcow2 pass
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-raw blocked
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw blocked
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-raw blocked
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-raw pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-raw fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-raw pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd blocked
> test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-vhd blocked
> test-amd64-i386-libvirt-vhd blocked
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-vhd pass
> test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-vhd pass
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org
> logs: /home/logs/logs
> images: /home/logs/images
>
> Logs, config files, etc. are available at
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs
>
> Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master
>
> Test harness code can be found at
> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
>
>
> Not pushing.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL
2015-07-31 6:40 ` [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL Ian Campbell
@ 2015-07-31 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 8:50 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-31 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-07-31 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner, Wei Liu; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 07:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 05:01 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 60149 osstest real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60149/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > build-i386-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR.
> > vs. 60083
> > build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR.
> > vs. 60083
> > build-armhf-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR.
> > vs. 60083
>
> Pretest contains the libvirt testing from Wei (ccd)
>
> One of the libvirt self tests failed:
> TEST: virshtest
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 40
> !!!!!!!!!!!! 52 FAIL
> FAIL: virshtest
> [...]
> =======================================
> 1 of 114 tests failed
> (1 test was not run)
> Please report to libvir-list@redhat.com
> =======================================
>
> Which isn't a lot to go on, aside frmo fixing this issue do we need to
> gather more logs?
Shall we drop "ts-libvirt-build: run libvirt test suite" from pretest for
the time being? It seems a bit orthogonal to the rest of the series anyway.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL
2015-07-31 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-07-31 8:50 ` Wei Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wei Liu @ 2015-07-31 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: Wei Liu, osstest service owner, xen-devel
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 09:49:30AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 07:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 05:01 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > flight 60149 osstest real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60149/
> > >
> > > Regressions :-(
> > >
> > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > including tests which could not be run:
> > > build-i386-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR.
> > > vs. 60083
> > > build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR.
> > > vs. 60083
> > > build-armhf-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR.
> > > vs. 60083
> >
> > Pretest contains the libvirt testing from Wei (ccd)
> >
> > One of the libvirt self tests failed:
> > TEST: virshtest
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 40
> > !!!!!!!!!!!! 52 FAIL
> > FAIL: virshtest
> > [...]
> > =======================================
> > 1 of 114 tests failed
> > (1 test was not run)
> > Please report to libvir-list@redhat.com
> > =======================================
> >
> > Which isn't a lot to go on, aside frmo fixing this issue do we need to
> > gather more logs?
>
> Shall we drop "ts-libvirt-build: run libvirt test suite" from pretest for
> the time being? It seems a bit orthogonal to the rest of the series anyway.
>
Yes, that's fine.
Wei.
> Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL
2015-07-31 6:40 ` [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-07-31 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 9:54 ` Wei Liu
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-07-31 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner, Wei Liu; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 07:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 9 redhat-install fail REGR.
> > vs. 60083
>
> 2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z execution took 71 seconds[<=2x600]: timeout 630 ssh
> -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o BatchMode=yes -o ConnectTimeout=100 -o
> ServerAliveInterval=100 -o PasswordAuthentication=no -o
> ChallengeResponseAuthentication=no -o
> UserKnownHostsFile=tmp/t.known_hosts_60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm
> -amd root@172.16.144.35 mkdir -p /root/60149.test-amd64-i386
> -qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.redhat-newiso
> genisoimage -R -J -T -b isolinux/isolinux.bin -c
> isolinux/boot.cat -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table -o
> /root/60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.rhel-server-6.1-i386
> -dvd.iso /root/60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.redhat-newiso/.
> Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
> Osstest/TestSupport.pm line 1736.
By inspection I think this one might be:
diff --git a/Osstest/TestSupport.pm b/Osstest/TestSupport.pm
index a6d42bd..ceb4d0f 100644
--- a/Osstest/TestSupport.pm
+++ b/Osstest/TestSupport.pm
@@ -1733,7 +1733,7 @@ sub more_prepareguest_hvm ($$$$;@) {
}
my $disks = join ",\t\t\n", map { "'$_'" } @disks;
- my $kernel = $ho->{Toolstack}->{Name} =~ m/xend/ ?
+ my $kernel = toolstack($ho)->{Name} =~ m/xend/ ?
"kernel = 'hvmloader'" : '';
my $cfg = <<END;
Since toolstack() is the function which initialises $ho->{Toolstack} my
hypothesis is that on this path nothing has previously called toolstack(),
something which could well have changed over a rebase at some point. I
could imagine also that ts-{redhat,debian-hvm,windows}-install might differ
in some subtle way here.
> 2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z runvar store:
> redhat_cfgpath=/etc/xen/redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
> 2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z executing scp ... /home/logs/logs/60149/test-amd64
> -i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd/pinot1--redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
> root@172.16.144.35:/etc/xen/redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
> 2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 (echo
> xenvnc; echo xenvnc) | vncpasswd redhat.vncpw
> 2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 readlink
> /dev/pinot1/redhat.guest.osstest-disk
> 2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 lvdisplay -
> -colon /dev/pinot1/redhat.guest.osstest-disk
> Can't call method "create" on unblessed reference at
> Osstest/TestSupport.pm line 1436.
I can't explain this one yet.
Calling a method on an undefined value results in a different message,
"Can't call method "create" on an undefined value", so somehow
toolstack($ho) is an actual reference, but an unblessed one. I haven't
figured out how that can have happened yet.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL
2015-07-31 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-07-31 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 10:15 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 9:54 ` Wei Liu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-07-31 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner, Wei Liu; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 10:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> 2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z runvar store:
> > redhat_cfgpath=/etc/xen/redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
> > 2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z executing scp ... /home/logs/logs/60149/test
> > -amd64
> > -i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd/pinot1--redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
> > root@172.16.144.35:/etc/xen/redhat.guest.osstest.cfg
> > 2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35
> > (echo
> > xenvnc; echo xenvnc) | vncpasswd redhat.vncpw
> > 2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 readlink
> > /dev/pinot1/redhat.guest.osstest-disk
> > 2015-07-30 23:02:33 Z executing ssh ... root@172.16.144.35 lvdisplay -
> > -colon /dev/pinot1/redhat.guest.osstest-disk
> > Can't call method "create" on unblessed reference at
> > Osstest/TestSupport.pm line 1436.
>
> I can't explain this one yet.
>
> Calling a method on an undefined value results in a different message,
> "Can't call method "create" on an undefined value", so somehow
> toolstack($ho) is an actual reference, but an unblessed one. I haven't
> figured out how that can have happened yet.
$ cat t.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use strict;
my $foo = {};
my $baz = $foo->{Bar}->{Name} =~ m/123/ ? "A" : "B";
print "$baz\n";
$foo->{Bar}->create();
$ ./t.pl
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /home/ianc/t.pl line 7.
B
Can't call method "create" on unblessed reference at /home/ianc/t.pl line 10.
Whereas with:
my $baz = $foo->{Bar} =~ m/123/ ? "A" : "B";
the error is:
Can't call method "create" on an undefined value at /home/ianc/t.pl line 10.
IOW something about:
$foo->{Bar}->{Name} =~ m/123/ ? "A" : "B";
causes $foo->{Bar} to be initialised.
IOW I think the fix to more_prepareguest_hvm is going to fix this too.
I'll fold that in, drop the patch which does make test and force push to
osstest's pretest, then I'll kill the current flight.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL
2015-07-31 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-07-31 9:54 ` Wei Liu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wei Liu @ 2015-07-31 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: Wei Liu, osstest service owner, xen-devel
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:47:22AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 07:40 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 9 redhat-install fail REGR.
> > > vs. 60083
> >
> > 2015-07-30 23:02:32 Z execution took 71 seconds[<=2x600]: timeout 630 ssh
> > -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o BatchMode=yes -o ConnectTimeout=100 -o
> > ServerAliveInterval=100 -o PasswordAuthentication=no -o
> > ChallengeResponseAuthentication=no -o
> > UserKnownHostsFile=tmp/t.known_hosts_60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm
> > -amd root@172.16.144.35 mkdir -p /root/60149.test-amd64-i386
> > -qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.redhat-newiso
> > genisoimage -R -J -T -b isolinux/isolinux.bin -c
> > isolinux/boot.cat -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table -o
> > /root/60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.rhel-server-6.1-i386
> > -dvd.iso /root/60149.test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd.redhat-newiso/.
> > Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
> > Osstest/TestSupport.pm line 1736.
>
> By inspection I think this one might be:
> diff --git a/Osstest/TestSupport.pm b/Osstest/TestSupport.pm
> index a6d42bd..ceb4d0f 100644
> --- a/Osstest/TestSupport.pm
> +++ b/Osstest/TestSupport.pm
> @@ -1733,7 +1733,7 @@ sub more_prepareguest_hvm ($$$$;@) {
> }
> my $disks = join ",\t\t\n", map { "'$_'" } @disks;
>
> - my $kernel = $ho->{Toolstack}->{Name} =~ m/xend/ ?
> + my $kernel = toolstack($ho)->{Name} =~ m/xend/ ?
> "kernel = 'hvmloader'" : '';
>
> my $cfg = <<END;
>
> Since toolstack() is the function which initialises $ho->{Toolstack} my
> hypothesis is that on this path nothing has previously called toolstack(),
> something which could well have changed over a rebase at some point. I
> could imagine also that ts-{redhat,debian-hvm,windows}-install might differ
> in some subtle way here.
>
Good catch.
The root cause is ts-debian-hvm-install calls host_get_free_memory which
initialises toolstack in the background. It's a trick only used by
debian hvm test case.
And I think your fix is correct.
Wei.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL
2015-07-31 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2015-07-31 10:15 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2015-07-31 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: osstest service owner, Wei Liu; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 10:54 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> I'll fold that in, drop the patch which does make test and force push to
> osstest's pretest, then I'll kill the current flight.
Done. The killed flight was 60184.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-31 10:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <osstest-60149-mainreport@xen.org>
2015-07-31 6:40 ` [osstest test] 60149: regressions - FAIL Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 8:50 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-31 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 9:54 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 10:15 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-31 9:54 ` Wei Liu
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.