From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534 <Dongsheng.Wang@freescale.com>
Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Jin Zhengxiong-R64188 <Jason.Jin@freescale.com>,
"Wang Huan-B18965" <alison.wang@freescale.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Zhao Chenhui-B35336 <chenhui.zhao@freescale.com>,
Tang Yuantian-B29983 <Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443149032.32298.102.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0301MB161653CC69BB78A0A8B565569D420@SN1PR0301MB1616.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 21:38 -0500, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > > +* Freescale RCPM Wakeup Source Device Tree Bindings
> > > +-------------------------------------------
> > > +Required rcpm-wakeup property should be added to a device node if the
> > > device
> > > +can be used as a wakeup source.
> > > +
> > > + - rcpm-wakeup: The value of the property consists of cells, the
> > > number of
> > > + cells defined in "fsl,#rcpm-wakeup-cells". The first cell is a
> > > pointer
> > > + to the rcpm node, the second cell is the bit mask that should be
> > > set
> > > + in IPPDEXPCR0, and the third cell is for IPPDEXPCR1, and so on.
> >
> > The phandle should not be included in the cell count.
> >
>
> Yes, the first cell "&rcpm" should be in the cell count, right?
No. None of the other #foo-cells work that way.
-Scott
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: scottwood@freescale.com (Scott Wood)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443149032.32298.102.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0301MB161653CC69BB78A0A8B565569D420@SN1PR0301MB1616.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 21:38 -0500, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > > +* Freescale RCPM Wakeup Source Device Tree Bindings
> > > +-------------------------------------------
> > > +Required rcpm-wakeup property should be added to a device node if the
> > > device
> > > +can be used as a wakeup source.
> > > +
> > > + - rcpm-wakeup: The value of the property consists of cells, the
> > > number of
> > > + cells defined in "fsl,#rcpm-wakeup-cells". The first cell is a
> > > pointer
> > > + to the rcpm node, the second cell is the bit mask that should be
> > > set
> > > + in IPPDEXPCR0, and the third cell is for IPPDEXPCR1, and so on.
> >
> > The phandle should not be included in the cell count.
> >
>
> Yes, the first cell "&rcpm" should be in the cell count, right?
No. None of the other #foo-cells work that way.
-Scott
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
<Dongsheng.Wang-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Jin Zhengxiong-R64188
<Jason.Jin-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Wang Huan-B18965
<alison.wang-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Zhao Chenhui-B35336
<chenhui.zhao-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Tang Yuantian-B29983
<Yuantian.Tang-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 21:43:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1443149032.32298.102.camel@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0301MB161653CC69BB78A0A8B565569D420-VLIetriUNobRRq1t3zq48ZwN6zqB+hSMnBOFsp37pqbUKgpGm//BTAC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 21:38 -0500, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > > +* Freescale RCPM Wakeup Source Device Tree Bindings
> > > +-------------------------------------------
> > > +Required rcpm-wakeup property should be added to a device node if the
> > > device
> > > +can be used as a wakeup source.
> > > +
> > > + - rcpm-wakeup: The value of the property consists of cells, the
> > > number of
> > > + cells defined in "fsl,#rcpm-wakeup-cells". The first cell is a
> > > pointer
> > > + to the rcpm node, the second cell is the bit mask that should be
> > > set
> > > + in IPPDEXPCR0, and the third cell is for IPPDEXPCR1, and so on.
> >
> > The phandle should not be included in the cell count.
> >
>
> Yes, the first cell "&rcpm" should be in the cell count, right?
No. None of the other #foo-cells work that way.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 8:29 [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM Dongsheng Wang
2015-09-24 8:29 ` Dongsheng Wang
2015-09-24 8:29 ` Dongsheng Wang
2015-09-24 8:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm/layerscape: add RCPM device tree support for ls1021a Dongsheng Wang
2015-09-24 8:29 ` Dongsheng Wang
2015-09-24 8:29 ` Dongsheng Wang
2015-09-24 12:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] fsl: Add binding for RCPM Shawn Guo
2015-09-24 12:29 ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-24 12:29 ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-25 2:24 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-25 2:24 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-25 2:24 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-24 19:30 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-24 19:30 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-24 19:30 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-25 2:38 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-25 2:38 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-25 2:38 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-25 2:43 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2015-09-25 2:43 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-25 2:43 ` Scott Wood
2015-09-25 2:51 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-25 2:51 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-09-25 2:51 ` Wang Dongsheng
[not found] ` <CALRxmdDwGgxCG5SfSOaEXK8_fJcG4UUw_9D2=NA7nQhikDyb+A@mail.gmail.com>
2015-10-01 17:05 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-10-01 17:05 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-10-01 17:05 ` Stuart Yoder
2015-10-01 17:07 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-01 17:07 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-01 17:07 ` Scott Wood
2015-10-08 2:32 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-10-08 2:32 ` Wang Dongsheng
2015-10-08 2:32 ` Wang Dongsheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1443149032.32298.102.camel@freescale.com \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=Dongsheng.Wang@freescale.com \
--cc=Jason.Jin@freescale.com \
--cc=Yuantian.Tang@freescale.com \
--cc=alison.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=chenhui.zhao@freescale.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.