From: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:02:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445986945.21669.11.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562FFE71.6090901@hurleysoftware.com>
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:45 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 02:35 PM, ND Linux CI Server wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > This email is automatically generated by ND's Linux Patch Testing
> > framework
> > based on aiaiai. I have performed some automatic testing of a patch
> > (series)
> > you submitted to intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
> >
> > The following contains output of any tests which failed to pass,
> > and might be
> > the result of developer error. The tests performed include but may
> > not be
> > limited to checkpatch.pl, bisection testing, compilation on a
> > default kernel
> > config, coccinelle scripts, cppcheck, and smatch.
> >
> > If you have received this email in error, or believe that aiaiai
> > has detected a
> > false positive, please email Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com
> > >.
>
> False positive.
>
> As long as the delay is at least 1ms (which is guaranteed), slightly
> longer
> delays (relative to the existing reset delay of 100ms) are not
> harmful.
>
> Use of usleep_range() would be unnecessary overkill for the purpose.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
Feel free to ignore this then.
Regards,
Jake
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: "dan.streetman@canonical.com" <dan.streetman@canonical.com>,
"peter@hurleysoftware.com" <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:02:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445986945.21669.11.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562FFE71.6090901@hurleysoftware.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1324 bytes --]
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:45 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 02:35 PM, ND Linux CI Server wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > This email is automatically generated by ND's Linux Patch Testing
> > framework
> > based on aiaiai. I have performed some automatic testing of a patch
> > (series)
> > you submitted to intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> >
> > The following contains output of any tests which failed to pass,
> > and might be
> > the result of developer error. The tests performed include but may
> > not be
> > limited to checkpatch.pl, bisection testing, compilation on a
> > default kernel
> > config, coccinelle scripts, cppcheck, and smatch.
> >
> > If you have received this email in error, or believe that aiaiai
> > has detected a
> > false positive, please email Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com
> > >.
>
> False positive.
>
> As long as the delay is at least 1ms (which is guaranteed), slightly
> longer
> delays (relative to the existing reset delay of 100ms) are not
> harmful.
>
> Use of usleep_range() would be unnecessary overkill for the purpose.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
Feel free to ignore this then.
Regards,
Jakeÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: "dan.streetman@canonical.com" <dan.streetman@canonical.com>,
"peter@hurleysoftware.com" <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 23:02:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445986945.21669.11.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562FFE71.6090901@hurleysoftware.com>
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 18:45 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 02:35 PM, ND Linux CI Server wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > This email is automatically generated by ND's Linux Patch Testing
> > framework
> > based on aiaiai. I have performed some automatic testing of a patch
> > (series)
> > you submitted to intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> >
> > The following contains output of any tests which failed to pass,
> > and might be
> > the result of developer error. The tests performed include but may
> > not be
> > limited to checkpatch.pl, bisection testing, compilation on a
> > default kernel
> > config, coccinelle scripts, cppcheck, and smatch.
> >
> > If you have received this email in error, or believe that aiaiai
> > has detected a
> > false positive, please email Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com
> > >.
>
> False positive.
>
> As long as the delay is at least 1ms (which is guaranteed), slightly
> longer
> delays (relative to the existing reset delay of 100ms) are not
> harmful.
>
> Use of usleep_range() would be unnecessary overkill for the purpose.
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
Feel free to ignore this then.
Regards,
Jake
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20151027183559.GA14014@aiaiai.jf.intel.com>
2015-10-27 22:45 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST Peter Hurley
2015-10-27 22:45 ` Peter Hurley
2015-10-27 23:02 ` Keller, Jacob E [this message]
2015-10-27 23:02 ` Keller, Jacob E
2015-10-27 23:02 ` Keller, Jacob E
2015-10-27 17:57 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] " Peter Hurley
2015-10-27 18:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] " Dan Streetman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445986945.21669.11.camel@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.