From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:57:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562FBB01.3080901@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445904971-9442-1-git-send-email-dan.streetman@canonical.com>
Hi Dan,
On 10/26/2015 08:16 PM, dan.streetman at canonical.com wrote:
> From: Dan Streetman <dan.streetman@canonical.com>
>
> The driver currently waits 1us after issuing a RST, but the spec
> requires it to wait 1ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <dan.streetman@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c
> index 4e75843..147bc65 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,12 @@ mac_reset_top:
>
> /* Poll for reset bit to self-clear indicating reset is complete */
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> - udelay(1);
> + /* sec 8.2.4.1.1 :
> + * programmers must wait approximately 1 ms after setting before
> + * attempting to check if the bit has cleared or to access (read
> + * or write) any other device register.
> + */
> + mdelay(1);
Since ixgbe_reset_hw_x540() goes on to msleep(100) immediately after this
busy-wait loop, this should instead be:
msleep(1);
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> ctrl = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_CTRL);
> if (!(ctrl & IXGBE_CTRL_RST_MASK))
> break;
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: dan.streetman@canonical.com, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@intel.com>,
Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>,
Matthew Vick <matthew.vick@intel.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 13:57:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562FBB01.3080901@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445904971-9442-1-git-send-email-dan.streetman@canonical.com>
Hi Dan,
On 10/26/2015 08:16 PM, dan.streetman@canonical.com wrote:
> From: Dan Streetman <dan.streetman@canonical.com>
>
> The driver currently waits 1us after issuing a RST, but the spec
> requires it to wait 1ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <dan.streetman@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c
> index 4e75843..147bc65 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_x540.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,12 @@ mac_reset_top:
>
> /* Poll for reset bit to self-clear indicating reset is complete */
> for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
> - udelay(1);
> + /* sec 8.2.4.1.1 :
> + * programmers must wait approximately 1 ms after setting before
> + * attempting to check if the bit has cleared or to access (read
> + * or write) any other device register.
> + */
> + mdelay(1);
Since ixgbe_reset_hw_x540() goes on to msleep(100) immediately after this
busy-wait loop, this should instead be:
msleep(1);
Regards,
Peter Hurley
> ctrl = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_CTRL);
> if (!(ctrl & IXGBE_CTRL_RST_MASK))
> break;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 0:16 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ixgbe: Wait for 1ms, not 1us, after RST dan.streetman
2015-10-27 0:16 ` dan.streetman
2015-10-27 17:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Skidmore, Donald C
2015-10-27 17:03 ` Skidmore, Donald C
2015-10-27 17:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Streetman
2015-10-27 17:32 ` Dan Streetman
2015-10-27 17:57 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2015-10-27 17:57 ` Peter Hurley
2015-10-27 18:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCHv2] " Dan Streetman
2015-10-27 18:27 ` Dan Streetman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562FBB01.3080901@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.