From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:55:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450220141.16653.7.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151215205731.GT4437@intel.com>
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 22:57 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > All platforms with power well support have runtime PM support, so
> > simplify things by explicitly disabling power well support on
> > platforms
> > without runtime PM support. This results in holding the init power
> > domain
> > reference whenever the driver is loaded in addition to an RPM
> > reference,
> > which reflects the reality better and makes it possible to simplify
> > things by removing the HAS_RUNTIME_PM special casing from more
> > places in
> > a follow-up patch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index 9945040..f4ff5f5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -1908,6 +1908,11 @@ static int
> > sanitize_disable_power_well_option(const struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > int disable_power_well)
> > {
> > + if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv)) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No runtime PM support, disabling
> > display power well support\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> Feels a bit too magic to me. Needs a comment at least, otherwise
> someone
> is going to change disable_power_well back into something you can
> disable
> at runtime and then all the old stuff might break.
>
> Grabbing an extra rpm reference explicitly for this purpose might be
> less confusing.
Ok, agreed. But making power well support depend on RPM still ok with
you? I can add then the extra RPM get/put only for !HAS_RUNTIME_PM.
>
> > +
> > if (disable_power_well >= 0)
> > return !!disable_power_well;
> >
> > --
> > 2.5.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-15 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 18:10 [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: clarify comment about mandatory RPM put/get during driver load/unload Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:44 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: disable power well support on platforms without runtime PM support Imre Deak
2015-12-15 20:57 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-15 22:55 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2015-12-16 11:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 13:21 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:13 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: refactor RPM disabling due to RC6 being disabled Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:54 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:01 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-16 10:56 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:49 ` [PATCH 4.1/10] drm/i915: get a permanent RPM reference on platforms w/o RPM support Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Imre Deak
2015-12-16 17:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-12-16 18:22 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:44 ` [PATCH v3.1/10] " Imre Deak
2015-12-17 11:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers Imre Deak
2015-12-17 12:46 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: add assert_rpm_wakelock_held helper Imre Deak
2015-12-16 12:11 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:54 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 13:02 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 13:39 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 13:43 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: use assert_rpm_wakelock_held instead of opencoding it Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: add support for checking if we hold an RPM reference Imre Deak
2015-12-15 21:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-15 22:52 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-16 0:14 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 0:52 ` [PATCH v5 " Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:00 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-12-16 12:49 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: add support for checking RPM atomic sections Imre Deak
2015-12-16 11:06 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2015-12-16 11:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-12-16 22:53 ` Imre Deak
2015-12-15 18:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: check that we are in an RPM atomic section in GGTT PTE updaters Imre Deak
2015-12-17 14:44 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] drm/i915: improve the RPM device suspended assert Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1450220141.16653.7.camel@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.