All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: recalculate per-cpupool credits when updating timeslice
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:33:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454412780.9227.87.camel@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56B08679.3060807@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1300 bytes --]

On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 11:35 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 02/02/16 10:53, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > 
> > In any case, since the lack of locking and lack of recalculation
> > look
> > like two pretty independent existing bugs to me, can we have
> > either:
> >  a. two patches;
> >  b. one patch but with both the issues described in the changelog.
> > 
> > My preference going to a.
> 
> Without setting prv->credit the lock isn't necessary. In case of a
> race domain weights wouldn't be honored correctly for just one
> timeslice and I doubt this would be noticeable at all.
> 
Ah, yes, I see what you mean now!!

> OTOH I don't mind splitting the patch into two, I have to respin
> anyway.
> 
Well, no, given you explanation above, to which I agree (sory for not
seeing this before), keeping it being just one patch would actually be
better IMO...

But then, please, explain in the changelog that the recalculation would
introduce a race, and hence you also need to lock.

Thanks and regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-02 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-29 10:21 [PATCH] xen: recalculate per-cpupool credits when updating timeslice Juergen Gross
2016-01-29 10:46 ` Jan Beulich
     [not found] ` <56AB511402000078000CC59C@suse.com>
2016-01-29 10:59   ` Juergen Gross
2016-02-02  9:53     ` Dario Faggioli
2016-02-02 10:35       ` Juergen Gross
2016-02-02 11:33         ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2016-02-02  7:55 ` Alan Robinson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454412780.9227.87.camel@citrix.com \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.