* [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task [not found] <cover.1455235907.git.chris_larson@mentor.com> @ 2016-02-12 0:13 ` Christopher Larson 2016-02-12 0:15 ` Christopher Larson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Christopher Larson @ 2016-02-12 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitbake-devel; +Cc: Christopher Larson From: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> An example prefix: `perl-5.22.1-r0 do_compile:` Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> --- lib/bb/ui/knotty.py | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py b/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py index a8b968c..87e2a64 100644 --- a/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py +++ b/lib/bb/ui/knotty.py @@ -359,11 +359,19 @@ def main(server, eventHandler, params, tf = TerminalFilter): return_value = 1 elif event.levelno == format.WARNING: warnings = warnings + 1 - # For "normal" logging conditions, don't show note logs from tasks - # but do show them if the user has changed the default log level to - # include verbose/debug messages - if event.taskpid != 0 and event.levelno <= format.NOTE and (event.levelno < llevel or (event.levelno == format.NOTE and llevel != format.VERBOSE)): - continue + + if event.taskpid != 0: + # For "normal" logging conditions, don't show note logs from tasks + # but do show them if the user has changed the default log level to + # include verbose/debug messages + if event.levelno <= format.NOTE and (event.levelno < llevel or (event.levelno == format.NOTE and llevel != format.VERBOSE)): + continue + + # Prefix task messages with recipe/task + if event.taskpid in helper.running_tasks: + taskinfo = helper.running_tasks[event.taskpid] + event.msg = taskinfo['title'] + ': ' + event.msg + logger.handle(event) continue -- 2.2.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task 2016-02-12 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task Christopher Larson @ 2016-02-12 0:15 ` Christopher Larson 2016-02-14 15:18 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Christopher Larson @ 2016-02-12 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: bitbake-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 448 bytes --] On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM Christopher Larson <kergoth@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > > An example prefix: `perl-5.22.1-r0 do_compile:` > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > I realize this may well be something to do for 2.2 rather than 2.1, but I wanted to throw it out and get thoughts on it, as I'm sick of manually prefixing our log messages in tasks :) [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 847 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task 2016-02-12 0:15 ` Christopher Larson @ 2016-02-14 15:18 ` Richard Purdie 2016-02-16 11:14 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2016-02-14 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Larson, bitbake-devel On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 00:15 +0000, Christopher Larson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM Christopher Larson <kergoth@gmail.com > > wrote: > > From: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > > > > An example prefix: `perl-5.22.1-r0 do_compile:` > > > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > I realize this may well be something to do for 2.2 rather than 2.1, > but I wanted to throw it out and get thoughts on it, as I'm sick of > manually prefixing our log messages in tasks :) I like the idea and actually wondered why this was an RFC, shouldn't we just do it? Having watched oe-selftest having a problems with this, I can see why we may need to be more cautious :/. Still trying to assess how bad the issues there are. Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task 2016-02-14 15:18 ` Richard Purdie @ 2016-02-16 11:14 ` Richard Purdie 2016-02-16 15:01 ` Christopher Larson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2016-02-16 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christopher Larson, bitbake-devel On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 15:18 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 00:15 +0000, Christopher Larson wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM Christopher Larson < > > kergoth@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > From: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > > > > > > An example prefix: `perl-5.22.1-r0 do_compile:` > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > > I realize this may well be something to do for 2.2 rather than 2.1, > > but I wanted to throw it out and get thoughts on it, as I'm sick of > > manually prefixing our log messages in tasks :) > > I like the idea and actually wondered why this was an RFC, shouldn't > we > just do it? > > Having watched oe-selftest having a problems with this, I can see why > we may need to be more cautious :/. > > Still trying to assess how bad the issues there are. Fixed the issues in selftest so decided to merge this as it is an issue we've needed to address for a while. Thanks! Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task 2016-02-16 11:14 ` Richard Purdie @ 2016-02-16 15:01 ` Christopher Larson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Christopher Larson @ 2016-02-16 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie, bitbake-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1217 bytes --] On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 4:15 AM Richard Purdie < richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 15:18 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-02-12 at 00:15 +0000, Christopher Larson wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:13 PM Christopher Larson < > > > kergoth@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > From: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > > > > > > > > An example prefix: `perl-5.22.1-r0 do_compile:` > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <chris_larson@mentor.com> > > > I realize this may well be something to do for 2.2 rather than 2.1, > > > but I wanted to throw it out and get thoughts on it, as I'm sick of > > > manually prefixing our log messages in tasks :) > > > > I like the idea and actually wondered why this was an RFC, shouldn't > > we > > just do it? > > > > Having watched oe-selftest having a problems with this, I can see why > > we may need to be more cautious :/. > > > > Still trying to assess how bad the issues there are. > > Fixed the issues in selftest so decided to merge this as it is an issue > we've needed to address for a while. > > Thanks! > NP, Thanks for taking the time to look into and test this. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1868 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-16 15:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <cover.1455235907.git.chris_larson@mentor.com>
2016-02-12 0:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] bb.ui.knotty: prefix task messages with recipe/task Christopher Larson
2016-02-12 0:15 ` Christopher Larson
2016-02-14 15:18 ` Richard Purdie
2016-02-16 11:14 ` Richard Purdie
2016-02-16 15:01 ` Christopher Larson
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.