From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:17:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459538265.23200.8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330074926.GC12776@quack.suse.cz>
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:49 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 29-03-16 18:57:16, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 16:34 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > <>
> >
> > >
> > > Seems kind of sad to fail the fault due to a bad block when we
> > > were
> > > going to zero it anyway, right? I'm not seeing a compelling
> > > reason to
> > > keep any zeroing in fs/dax.c.
> > Agreed - but how do we do this? clear_pmem needs to be able to clear
> > an
> > arbitrary number of bytes, but to go through the driver, we'd need
> > to
> > send down a bio? If only the driver had an rw_bytes like interface
> > that
> > could be used by anyone... :)
> Actually, my patches for page fault locking remove zeroing from
> dax_insert_mapping() and __dax_pmd_fault() - the zeroing now happens
> from
> the filesystem only and the zeroing in those two functions is just a
> dead
> code...
That should make things easier! Do you have a tree I could merge in to
get this? (WIP is ok as we know that my series will depend on yours..)
or, if you can distill out that patch on a 4.6-rc1 base, I could carry
it in my series too (your v2's 3/10 doesn't apply on 4.6-rc1..)
Thanks,
-Vishal
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"david@fromorbit.com" <david@fromorbit.com>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Wilcox, Matthew
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:17:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459538265.23200.8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330074926.GC12776@quack.suse.cz>
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:49 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 29-03-16 18:57:16, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 16:34 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > <>
> >
> > >
> > > Seems kind of sad to fail the fault due to a bad block when we
> > > were
> > > going to zero it anyway, right? I'm not seeing a compelling
> > > reason to
> > > keep any zeroing in fs/dax.c.
> > Agreed - but how do we do this? clear_pmem needs to be able to clear
> > an
> > arbitrary number of bytes, but to go through the driver, we'd need
> > to
> > send down a bio? If only the driver had an rw_bytes like interface
> > that
> > could be used by anyone... :)
> Actually, my patches for page fault locking remove zeroing from
> dax_insert_mapping() and __dax_pmd_fault() - the zeroing now happens
> from
> the filesystem only and the zeroing in those two functions is just a
> dead
> code...
That should make things easier! Do you have a tree I could merge in to
get this? (WIP is ok as we know that my series will depend on yours..)
or, if you can distill out that patch on a 4.6-rc1 base, I could carry
it in my series too (your v2's 3/10 doesn't apply on 4.6-rc1..)
Thanks,
-Vishal
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:17:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459538265.23200.8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330074926.GC12776@quack.suse.cz>
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:49 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 29-03-16 18:57:16, Verma, Vishal L wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 16:34 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > <>
> >
> > >
> > > Seems kind of sad to fail the fault due to a bad block when we
> > > were
> > > going to zero it anyway, right? I'm not seeing a compelling
> > > reason to
> > > keep any zeroing in fs/dax.c.
> > Agreed - but how do we do this? clear_pmem needs to be able to clear
> > an
> > arbitrary number of bytes, but to go through the driver, we'd need
> > to
> > send down a bio? If only the driver had an rw_bytes like interface
> > that
> > could be used by anyone... :)
> Actually, my patches for page fault locking remove zeroing from
> dax_insert_mapping() and __dax_pmd_fault() - the zeroing now happens
> from
> the filesystem only and the zeroing in those two functions is just a
> dead
> code...
That should make things easier! Do you have a tree I could merge in to
get this? (WIP is ok as we know that my series will depend on yours..)
or, if you can distill out that patch on a 4.6-rc1 base, I could carry
it in my series too (your v2's 3/10 doesn't apply on 4.6-rc1..)
Thanks,
-Vishal
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-01 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 23:17 [PATCH 0/5] dax: handling of media errors Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] block, dax: pass blk_dax_ctl through to drivers Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] dax: fallback from pmd to pte on error Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] dax: enable dax in the presence of known media errors (badblocks) Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:23 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-24 23:23 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-24 23:23 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] dax: use sb_issue_zerout instead of calling dax_clear_sectors Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-25 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 10:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 21:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 18:47 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 21:03 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:03 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:03 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:20 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 21:20 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 21:20 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-28 20:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-28 20:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-28 20:01 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-28 23:34 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-28 23:34 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-28 23:34 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-28 23:34 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-29 18:57 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-29 18:57 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-29 18:57 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-29 18:57 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-29 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-29 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-29 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-29 19:37 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-30 7:49 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-30 7:49 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-30 7:49 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-30 7:49 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-30 7:49 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-01 19:17 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2016-04-01 19:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-04-01 19:17 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-04-04 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-04 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-04 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-04 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-04-04 12:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-24 23:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-24 23:17 ` Vishal Verma
2016-03-25 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-25 20:59 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 20:59 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 21:42 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 21:42 ` Dan Williams
2016-03-25 22:36 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 22:36 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-25 22:36 ` Verma, Vishal L
2016-03-26 16:53 ` hch
2016-03-26 16:53 ` hch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459538265.23200.8.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.