From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] sched/wait: Add a waitqueue helper for fully exclusive priority waiters
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 00:10:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145ddb99-025b-4ed0-bee6-e1e2c70ff0bf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401204425.904001-7-seanjc@google.com>
Hello Sean,
On 4/2/2025 2:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
[..snip..]
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> index 51e38f5f4701..80d90d1dc24d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,26 @@ void add_wait_queue_priority(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, struct wait_queue_
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_wait_queue_priority);
>
> +int add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head,
> + struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry)
> +{
> + struct list_head *head = &wq_head->head;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int r = 0;
> +
> + wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | WQ_FLAG_PRIORITY;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&wq_head->lock, flags);
nit.
Using "guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&wq_head->lock)" can help you get rid of
both "flags" and "r".
> + if (!list_empty(head) &&
> + (list_first_entry(head, typeof(*wq_entry), entry)->flags & WQ_FLAG_PRIORITY))
> + r = -EBUSY;
> + else
> + list_add(&wq_entry->entry, head);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wq_head->lock, flags);
> +
> + return r;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive);
> +
> void remove_wait_queue(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] sched/wait: Add a waitqueue helper for fully exclusive priority waiters
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 00:10:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <145ddb99-025b-4ed0-bee6-e1e2c70ff0bf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401204425.904001-7-seanjc@google.com>
Hello Sean,
On 4/2/2025 2:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
[..snip..]
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> index 51e38f5f4701..80d90d1dc24d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,26 @@ void add_wait_queue_priority(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, struct wait_queue_
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_wait_queue_priority);
>
> +int add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head,
> + struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry)
> +{
> + struct list_head *head = &wq_head->head;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int r = 0;
> +
> + wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | WQ_FLAG_PRIORITY;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&wq_head->lock, flags);
nit.
Using "guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&wq_head->lock)" can help you get rid of
both "flags" and "r".
> + if (!list_empty(head) &&
> + (list_first_entry(head, typeof(*wq_entry), entry)->flags & WQ_FLAG_PRIORITY))
> + r = -EBUSY;
> + else
> + list_add(&wq_entry->entry, head);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wq_head->lock, flags);
> +
> + return r;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive);
> +
> void remove_wait_queue(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-01 20:44 [PATCH 00/12] KVM: Make irqfd registration globally unique Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: Use a local struct to do the initial vfs_poll() on an irqfd Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: Acquire SCRU lock outside of irqfds.lock during assignment Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: Initialize irqfd waitqueue callback when adding to the queue Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: Add irqfd to KVM's list via the vfs_poll() callback Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: Add irqfd to eventfd's waitqueue while holding irqfds.lock Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 06/12] sched/wait: Add a waitqueue helper for fully exclusive priority waiters Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-02 18:40 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2025-04-02 18:40 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: Disallow binding multiple irqfds to an eventfd with a priority waiter Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched/wait: Drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority() Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: Drop sanity check that per-VM list of irqfds is unique Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: selftests: Assert that eventfd() succeeds in Xen shinfo test Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: selftests: Add utilities to create eventfds and do KVM_IRQFD Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: selftests: Add a KVM_IRQFD test to verify uniqueness requirements Sean Christopherson
2025-04-01 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=145ddb99-025b-4ed0-bee6-e1e2c70ff0bf@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.