From: alekcejk@googlemail.com
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:54:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461927.R8CTCUdqT9@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQykm==YJZbdCbLxgJ236jD2yN0xT99gmeYX-FGnyBvfEGA@mail.gmail.com>
В сообщении от Четверг 16 февраля 2012 12:22:29 вы написали:
> Our team has also run into issues with GRO/LRO "stretch ACKs", and
> their negative impact on TCP performance. We have a patch that we've
> been working with that deals with the sender-side issues. It turns out
> that neither the ABC nor non-ABC byte counting quite fixes the stretch
> ACKs issues.
>
> On the receiver side, the approach of changing tcp_grow_window() and
> __tcp_grow_window() to adjust things in terms of actual packet size
> rather than a fixed 2*MSS sounds great to me as well.
>
> In terms of the original 3.1 vs 3.2 issue report that started this
> thread, I didn't see any evidence of LRO or GRO causing stretch ACKs.
> (Alexey, would you be able to confim by running "ethtool -k eth0" on
> both kernels?) So it seems that probably the original issue is
> unrelated to stretch ACKs?
>
> neal
Looks like "ethtool -k eth0" shows the same with both kernels:
Offload parameters for eth0:
rx-checksumming: on
tx-checksumming: on
scatter-gather: on
tcp-segmentation-offload: off
udp-fragmentation-offload: off
generic-segmentation-offload: on
generic-receive-offload: on
large-receive-offload: off
rx-vlan-offload: off
tx-vlan-offload: off
ntuple-filters: off
receive-hashing: off
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 20:04 limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels alekcejk
2012-02-13 20:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:58 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 22:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-13 23:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 23:24 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 3:06 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-14 3:26 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 14:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 21:16 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 4:21 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 17:19 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 18:53 ` alekcejk
2012-02-22 1:26 ` alekcejk
[not found] ` <1920135.kl3o7Tt79c@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1329228798.4818.0.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
2012-02-14 14:28 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 16:43 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 4:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 6:03 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 7:52 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15 8:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 8:18 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15 8:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:43 ` Re: Re: Re: Re: " alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 14:11 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 14:49 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 15:05 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 19:44 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 7:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 16:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 17:01 ` David Miller
2012-02-16 17:22 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 17:54 ` alekcejk [this message]
2012-02-16 18:19 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 21:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 21:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 22:08 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 22:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-17 16:41 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-21 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 19:11 ` David Miller
2012-02-22 5:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-22 7:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 18:39 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-23 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-27 19:39 ` David Miller
2012-02-17 16:55 ` Re: " Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 18:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461927.R8CTCUdqT9@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alekcejk@googlemail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.