All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alekcejk@googlemail.com
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:05:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2414604.1vsFa6H21P@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQymT6saSSmUmT7BUShfQFoJ+u4JMQ=F2bhRv4vB_Pzj=9Q@mail.gmail.com>

В сообщении от Среда 15 февраля 2012 09:49:07 вы написали:
> If there was an increase in the number of bytes charged to the socket
> for each skb, without a corresponding increase in TCP receive buffer
> size, that would explain a systematic decrease in receiver window that
> would cause some paths, like perhaps these, to become
> receiver-window-limited (which is consistent with the symptom of
> stable bandwidth for a given path).
> 
> Can you please try increasing the default TCP receiver window to see
> if this helps; try this as root on the 3.2 machine:
> 
> sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_rmem="4096 897664 897664"

The same results after setting this.

> 
> Basically making the middle number as big as the third number should
> bump up the default receiver window size.
> 
> neal

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-15 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-13 20:04 limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels alekcejk
2012-02-13 20:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:13   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:58     ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 22:44       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 22:51         ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-13 23:09           ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:14             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 23:24               ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:49         ` alekcejk
2012-02-14  3:06           ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-14  3:26             ` alekcejk
2012-02-14  5:55           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 14:09             ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 21:16   ` alekcejk
2012-02-21  4:21   ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 16:45     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 17:19       ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 17:31         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 18:53           ` alekcejk
2012-02-22  1:26           ` alekcejk
     [not found] ` <1920135.kl3o7Tt79c@localhost.localdomain>
     [not found]   ` <1329228798.4818.0.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
2012-02-14 14:28     ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 16:00       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 16:43         ` alekcejk
2012-02-15  4:43           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15  6:03             ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15  6:06               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15  7:52                 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15  8:00                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15  8:18                     ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15  8:31                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:44                   ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:43               ` Re: Re: Re: Re: " alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:44             ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:49               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:53                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 14:11                 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 14:49                   ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 14:56                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 15:05                     ` alekcejk [this message]
2012-02-15 15:08                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 19:44                     ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16  7:29                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:40                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:51                           ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 15:09                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 16:37                               ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 17:01                               ` David Miller
2012-02-16 17:22                                 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 17:54                                   ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 18:19                                     ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 21:49                                       ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 21:59                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 22:08                                           ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 22:35                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-17 16:41                                               ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-21 18:41                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 19:11                                                   ` David Miller
2012-02-22  5:51                                                   ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-22  7:36                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 18:39                                                       ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-23 18:49                                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-27 19:39                                                         ` David Miller
2012-02-17 16:55                                           ` Re: " Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 18:22                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 19:44                                     ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2414604.1vsFa6H21P@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=alekcejk@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.