From: alekcejk@googlemail.com
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:04:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8633039.fHPLx6GNq3@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hi,
I noticed that with 3.2.x kernels download speed from some internet resources
became about half of speed that was with previous kernels (3.1 and older).
I tested Fedora 15 kernels 2.6.41.10 = 3.1.10 and 2.6.42.3 = 3.2.3
(many times rebooted for testing with first and second kernels).
See bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789659
lsmod:
Module Size Used by
nvidia 10778232 40
i2c_core 28123 1 nvidia
8139too 32490 0
mii 13311 1 8139too
dmesg:
8139too: 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.28
8139too 0000:01:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 22
8139too 0000:01:02.0: eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at , IRQ 22
8139too 0000:01:02.0: eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x41E1
For testing I selected fastest for me download mirrors of FreeBSD and Ubuntu,
also I tested download speed from site speedtest.tele2.net.
For these sites download speed with 3.1 kernels (and older) is about 11 MB/s
but with 3.2.x kernels - limited 5.5 MB/s and for some sites still approximately
the same as with 3.1 kernels (see bug mentioned above).
Also I want to pay attention that limited speed stays constant - always
5.5 MB/s with straight line on traffic plotter as if was network bandwidth shaping.
With 3.1 kernels this never happens - speed can vary in some ranges
but at maximum it is about 11 MB/s, no limitations such as 5.5 MB/s.
--
Alexey Kurov <nucleo@fedoraproject.org>
next reply other threads:[~2012-02-13 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 20:04 alekcejk [this message]
2012-02-13 20:18 ` limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:58 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 22:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-13 23:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 23:24 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 3:06 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-14 3:26 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 14:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 21:16 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 4:21 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 17:19 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 18:53 ` alekcejk
2012-02-22 1:26 ` alekcejk
[not found] ` <1920135.kl3o7Tt79c@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1329228798.4818.0.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
2012-02-14 14:28 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 16:43 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 4:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 6:03 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 7:52 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15 8:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 8:18 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15 8:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:43 ` Re: Re: Re: Re: " alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 14:11 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 14:49 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 15:05 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 19:44 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 7:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 16:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 17:01 ` David Miller
2012-02-16 17:22 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 17:54 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 18:19 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 21:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 21:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 22:08 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 22:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-17 16:41 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-21 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 19:11 ` David Miller
2012-02-22 5:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-22 7:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 18:39 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-23 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-27 19:39 ` David Miller
2012-02-17 16:55 ` Re: " Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 18:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8633039.fHPLx6GNq3@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alekcejk@googlemail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.